J E Swain1. 1. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Sciences Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48108, USA. swainj@umich.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Reducing environmental stress imposed upon gametes and embryos in the IVF laboratory is crucial in optimizing culture conditions and development. One environmental parameter of particular importance is external pH (pHe) of culture media. An optimal pHe has not been identified. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed using keywords focused on pH and the embryo using PUBMED through August 2011, with no limits placed on a beginning time. Examples of keywords include CO(2), bicarbonate and hydrogen ion. Relevant papers were then examined to obtain additional publications. RESULTS: Determining optimal pHe is problematic due to difficulty in isolating pHe from other variables, such as CO(2) and bicarbonate. Various commercial media companies recommend differing pHe ranges, most within the range of 7.2-7.4, with some companies recommending altering pHe based on the gamete or stage of the embryo. However, changing pHe during culture has not been experimentally shown to improve outcomes. Further complicating attempts to define an optimal pHe is that media components can impact intracellular pH (pHi). As a result, media with different concentrations of substances, such as lactate or amino acids, may have different pHi, despite being in the same pHe. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the plasticity of embryos, a range of pHe's can support development, and defining an optimal pHe is difficult. It is unclear whether there is any benefit in changing pHe at various steps during IVF. The ideal pHe will likely vary from media to media and, until comparative studies have been performed isolating pHe, adherence to manufacturer recommendations and maintenance of a small acceptable pHe range are advisable.
BACKGROUND: Reducing environmental stress imposed upon gametes and embryos in the IVF laboratory is crucial in optimizing culture conditions and development. One environmental parameter of particular importance is external pH (pHe) of culture media. An optimal pHe has not been identified. METHODS: Electronic searches were performed using keywords focused on pH and the embryo using PUBMED through August 2011, with no limits placed on a beginning time. Examples of keywords include CO(2), bicarbonate and hydrogen ion. Relevant papers were then examined to obtain additional publications. RESULTS: Determining optimal pHe is problematic due to difficulty in isolating pHe from other variables, such as CO(2) and bicarbonate. Various commercial media companies recommend differing pHe ranges, most within the range of 7.2-7.4, with some companies recommending altering pHe based on the gamete or stage of the embryo. However, changing pHe during culture has not been experimentally shown to improve outcomes. Further complicating attempts to define an optimal pHe is that media components can impact intracellular pH (pHi). As a result, media with different concentrations of substances, such as lactate or amino acids, may have different pHi, despite being in the same pHe. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the plasticity of embryos, a range of pHe's can support development, and defining an optimal pHe is difficult. It is unclear whether there is any benefit in changing pHe at various steps during IVF. The ideal pHe will likely vary from media to media and, until comparative studies have been performed isolating pHe, adherence to manufacturer recommendations and maintenance of a small acceptable pHe range are advisable.
Authors: Mara Simopoulou; Konstantinos Sfakianoudis; Anna Rapani; Polina Giannelou; George Anifandis; Stamatis Bolaris; Agni Pantou; Maria Lambropoulou; Athanasios Pappas; Efthimios Deligeoroglou; Konstantinos Pantos; Michael Koutsilieris Journal: In Vivo Date: 2018 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.155
Authors: Andrea Abdala; Ibrahim Elkhatib; Aşina Bayram; Ana Arnanz; Ahmed El-Damen; Laura Melado; Barbara Lawrenz; Nicolás Garrido; Human M Fatemi; Neelke De Munck Journal: J Assist Reprod Genet Date: 2021-08-26 Impact factor: 3.412
Authors: Juan D N Diaz de Pool; Sjoerd A A Van Den Berg; Gonneke S K Pilgram; Bartholomeus E P B Ballieux; Lucia A J Van Der Westerlaken Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-11-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mohamed Fawzy; Mai Emad; Jack Wilkinson; Ragaa Mansour; Ali Mahran; Ahmed Fetih; Mohamed Abdelrahman; Hazem AbdelGhafar Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-02-04 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Octavio López-Albors; Pedro José Llamas-López; Joaquín Ángel Ortuño; Rafael Latorre; Francisco Alberto García-Vázquez Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-04 Impact factor: 4.379