Literature DB >> 22311782

Context-dependent enhancement of induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming by silencing Puma.

Blue B Lake1, Jürgen Fink, Liv Klemetsaune, Xuemei Fu, John R Jeffers, Gerard P Zambetti, Yang Xu.   

Abstract

Reprogramming of the somatic state to pluripotency can be induced by a defined set of transcription factors including Oct3/4, Sox2, Klf4, and c-Myc [Cell 2006;126:663-676]. These induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) hold great promise in human therapy and disease modeling. However, tumor suppressive activities of p53, which are necessary to prevent persistence of DNA damage in mammalian cells, have proven a serious impediment to formation of iPSCs [Nat Methods 2011;8:409-412]. We examined the requirement for downstream p53 activities in suppressing efficiency of reprogramming as well as preventing persistence of DNA damage into the early iPSCs. We discovered that the majority of the p53 activation occurred through early reprogramming-induced DNA damage with the activated expression of the apoptotic inducer Puma and the cell cycle inhibitor p21. While Puma deficiency increases reprogramming efficiency only in the absence of c-Myc, double deficiency of Puma and p21 has achieved a level of efficiency that exceeded that of p53 deficiency alone. We further demonstrated that, in both the presence and absence of p21, Puma deficiency was able to prevent any increase in persistent DNA damage in early iPSCs. This may be due to a compensatory cellular senescent response to reprogramming-induced DNA damage in pre-iPSCs. Therefore, our findings provide a potentially safe approach to enhance iPSC derivation by transiently silencing Puma and p21 without compromising genomic integrity.
Copyright © 2012 AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22311782      PMCID: PMC3531606          DOI: 10.1002/stem.1054

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stem Cells        ISSN: 1066-5099            Impact factor:   6.277


  35 in total

1.  Bcl-2 and accelerated DNA repair mediates resistance of hair follicle bulge stem cells to DNA-damage-induced cell death.

Authors:  Panagiota A Sotiropoulou; Aurélie Candi; Guilhem Mascré; Sarah De Clercq; Khalil Kass Youssef; Gaelle Lapouge; Ellen Dahl; Claudio Semeraro; Geertrui Denecker; Jean-Christophe Marine; Cédric Blanpain
Journal:  Nat Cell Biol       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 28.824

2.  Phosphorylation stabilizes Nanog by promoting its interaction with Pin1.

Authors:  Matteo Moretto-Zita; Hua Jin; Zhouxin Shen; Tongbiao Zhao; Steven P Briggs; Yang Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  p53 and stem cells: new developments and new concerns.

Authors:  Tongbiao Zhao; Yang Xu
Journal:  Trends Cell Biol       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 20.808

4.  Suppression of induced pluripotent stem cell generation by the p53-p21 pathway.

Authors:  Hyenjong Hong; Kazutoshi Takahashi; Tomoko Ichisaka; Takashi Aoi; Osami Kanagawa; Masato Nakagawa; Keisuke Okita; Shinya Yamanaka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-08-09       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Absence of p53-dependent apoptosis leads to UV radiation hypersensitivity, enhanced immunosuppression and cellular senescence.

Authors:  Omid Tavana; Cara L Benjamin; Nahum Puebla-Osorio; Mei Sang; Stephen E Ullrich; Honnavara N Ananthaswamy; Chengming Zhu
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2010-08-16       Impact factor: 4.534

6.  Mutant p53 facilitates somatic cell reprogramming and augments the malignant potential of reprogrammed cells.

Authors:  Rachel Sarig; Noa Rivlin; Ran Brosh; Chamutal Bornstein; Iris Kamer; Osnat Ezra; Alina Molchadsky; Naomi Goldfinger; Ori Brenner; Varda Rotter
Journal:  J Exp Med       Date:  2010-08-09       Impact factor: 14.307

7.  Modeling disease in human ESCs using an efficient BAC-based homologous recombination system.

Authors:  Hoseok Song; Sun-Ku Chung; Yang Xu
Journal:  Cell Stem Cell       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 24.633

8.  Genome integrity: linking pluripotency and tumorgenicity.

Authors:  Wenbin Deng; Yang Xu
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-10-02       Impact factor: 11.639

9.  Dynamic single-cell imaging of direct reprogramming reveals an early specifying event.

Authors:  Zachary D Smith; Iftach Nachman; Aviv Regev; Alexander Meissner
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 54.908

10.  Direct cell reprogramming is a stochastic process amenable to acceleration.

Authors:  Jacob Hanna; Krishanu Saha; Bernardo Pando; Jeroen van Zon; Christopher J Lengner; Menno P Creyghton; Alexander van Oudenaarden; Rudolf Jaenisch
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-11-08       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  18 in total

1.  ΔNp63 regulates select routes of reprogramming via multiple mechanisms.

Authors:  E M Alexandrova; O Petrenko; A Nemajerova; R-A Romano; S Sinha; U M Moll
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 15.828

2.  Artemisitene suppresses tumorigenesis by inducing DNA damage through deregulating c-Myc-topoisomerase pathway.

Authors:  Jian Chen; Wenjuan Li; Ke Cui; Kaiyuan Ji; Shuxiang Xu; Yang Xu
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2018-05-24       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  The genomic stability of induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Zhao Chen; Tongbiao Zhao; Yang Xu
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 14.870

4.  Apoptotic susceptibility to DNA damage of pluripotent stem cells facilitates pharmacologic purging of teratoma risk.

Authors:  Alyson J Smith; Natalie G Nelson; Saji Oommen; Katherine A Hartjes; Clifford D Folmes; Andre Terzic; Timothy J Nelson
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 6.940

5.  Notch inhibition allows oncogene-independent generation of iPS cells.

Authors:  Justin K Ichida; Julia Tcw; Luis A Williams; Ava C Carter; Yingxiao Shi; Marcelo T Moura; Michael Ziller; Sean Singh; Giovanni Amabile; Christoph Bock; Akihiro Umezawa; Lee L Rubin; James E Bradner; Hidenori Akutsu; Alexander Meissner; Kevin Eggan
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-06-22       Impact factor: 15.040

Review 6.  Building a microphysiological skin model from induced pluripotent stem cells.

Authors:  Zongyou Guo; Claire A Higgins; Brian M Gillette; Munenari Itoh; Noriko Umegaki; Karl Gledhill; Samuel K Sia; Angela M Christiano
Journal:  Stem Cell Res Ther       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 6.832

Review 7.  Challenges to the clinical application of pluripotent stem cells: towards genomic and functional stability.

Authors:  Xuemei Fu; Yang Xu
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2012-06-28       Impact factor: 11.117

8.  Genetic approach to track neural cell fate decisions using human embryonic stem cells.

Authors:  Xuemei Fu; Zhili Rong; Shengyun Zhu; Xiaocheng Wang; Yang Xu; Blue B Lake
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 14.870

Review 9.  Understanding the roadmaps to induced pluripotency.

Authors:  K Liu; Y Song; H Yu; T Zhao
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2014-05-15       Impact factor: 8.469

10.  Transient p53 suppression increases reprogramming of human fibroblasts without affecting apoptosis and DNA damage.

Authors:  Mikkel A Rasmussen; Bjørn Holst; Zeynep Tümer; Mads G Johnsen; Shuling Zhou; Tina C Stummann; Poul Hyttel; Christian Clausen
Journal:  Stem Cell Reports       Date:  2014-08-21       Impact factor: 7.765

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.