L A Harvey1, R Adams, J Chu, J Batty, D Barratt. 1. Rehabilitation Studies Unit, Northern Clinical School, Sydney School of Medicine, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia. lisa.harvey@sydney.edu.au
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the expectations that patients with recent spinal cord injury (SCI) had about walking 1 year from injury with the expectations of their physiotherapists. SETTING: Two Sydney SCI units. METHODS: A consecutive series of 47 patients admitted to the metropolitan SCI units was recruited. Using the mobility scale, expectations of the patients and their physiotherapists about walking at 1 year from SCI were recorded at the time of admission to rehabilitation. Ability to walk was then assessed at 1 year from the SCI. RESULTS: On admission to rehabilitation, 31 patients expected to walk about their homes at 1 year post SCI, but only 18 (58%) of these patients did so. In contrast, physiotherapists expected 21 patients to be able to walk about their homes at 1 year post SCI, with 17 (81%) of these patients doing so. Similarly, whereas 21 patients expected to walk about the community at 1 year post SCI, only 11 (52%) of these patients did so. Physiotherapists expected 8 patients to walk about the community at 1 year post SCI and 7 (88%) of these patients did so. The differences between patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking were statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of disagreement between patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking at 1 year post SCI. Differences between patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking are potentially problematic and requires research to identify appropriate management strategies.
STUDY DESIGN: A longitudinal cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the expectations that patients with recent spinal cord injury (SCI) had about walking 1 year from injury with the expectations of their physiotherapists. SETTING: Two Sydney SCI units. METHODS: A consecutive series of 47 patients admitted to the metropolitan SCI units was recruited. Using the mobility scale, expectations of the patients and their physiotherapists about walking at 1 year from SCI were recorded at the time of admission to rehabilitation. Ability to walk was then assessed at 1 year from the SCI. RESULTS: On admission to rehabilitation, 31 patients expected to walk about their homes at 1 year post SCI, but only 18 (58%) of these patients did so. In contrast, physiotherapists expected 21 patients to be able to walk about their homes at 1 year post SCI, with 17 (81%) of these patients doing so. Similarly, whereas 21 patients expected to walk about the community at 1 year post SCI, only 11 (52%) of these patients did so. Physiotherapists expected 8 patients to walk about the community at 1 year post SCI and 7 (88%) of these patients did so. The differences between patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking were statistically significant (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of disagreement between patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking at 1 year post SCI. Differences between patients' and physiotherapists' expectations about walking are potentially problematic and requires research to identify appropriate management strategies.