Literature DB >> 22310029

Cross-sectional area of the posterior extensor muscles of the cervical spine in whiplash injury patients versus healthy volunteers--10 year follow-up MR study.

Morio Matsumoto1, Daisuke Ichihara, Eijiro Okada, Kazuhiro Chiba, Yoshiaki Toyama, Hirokazu Fujiwara, Suketaka Momoshima, Yuji Nishiwaki, Takeshi Takahata.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Long-term follow-up studies focusing on the posterior extensor muscles in patients suffering from whiplash injury are scarce. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the changes in the posterior extensor muscles 10 years after whiplash injury.
METHODS: Twenty-three patients who had suffered from whiplash injury in 1994-1996 and had undergone MRI using a 1.5-T superconductive imager participated in this follow-up study (13 males, 10 females, mean age 51.8 years, mean follow-up 11.5 years). In addition, 60 healthy volunteers who had undergone MRI in the same period were included as controls (36 males, 24 females, mean age 47.8 years, mean follow-up 11.1 years). All participants underwent follow-up MRI. The cross-sectional areas of the deep posterior muscles (CSA) including the multifidus, semispinalis cervicis, semispinalis capitis, and splenius capitis were digitally measured at C3-4, C4-5, and C5-6 using NIH image. The long-term changes in the CSA were compared between the two groups. In addition, correlations between the CSA and cervical spine-related symptoms were evaluated.
RESULTS: The mean total CSA per patient (the sum of the area from C3-4 to C5-6) was 4811.6±878.4 mm(2) in the whiplash patients and 4494.9±1032.7 mm(2) in the controls at the initial investigation (p=0.20), and 5173.4±946.1 mm(2) and 4713.0±1065.3 mm(2) at the follow-up (p=0.07). The mean change in CSA over time was 361.8±804.9 mm(2) in the whiplash patients and 218.1±520.7 mm(2) in the controls (p=0.34). Ten whiplash patients (43.5%) had neck pain and 11 (47.8%) had shoulder stiffness. However, there was no difference in the change in CSA over time between the symptomatic and asymptomatic patients.
CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the change in CSA between whiplash patients and healthy volunteers after a 10-year follow-up period. In both groups, the cross-sectional area slightly increased at follow-up. In addition, there was no association between the change in CSA and clinical symptoms such as neck and shoulder pain. These results suggest that whiplash injury is not associated with symptomatic atrophy of the posterior cervical muscles over the long term.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22310029     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  16 in total

Review 1.  Advancing imaging technologies for patients with spinal pain: with a focus on whiplash injury.

Authors:  James M Elliott; Mark J Hancock; Rebecca J Crawford; Andrew C Smith; David M Walton
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 4.166

2.  Letter to the editor regarding Smuck M, Cristostomo RA, Demirjian R, et al. Morphologic change in the lumbar spine after lumbar medial branch radiofrequency neurotomy: a quantitative radiological study.

Authors:  Rebecca E Abbott; Todd B Parrish; Mark A Hoggarth; Andrew C Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2014-06-01       Impact factor: 4.166

3.  Brain Network Disruption in Whiplash.

Authors:  J P Higgins; J M Elliott; T B Parrish
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-06-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Does Overall Cervical Spine Pathology Relate to the Clinical Heterogeneity of Chronic Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Todd B Parrish; David M Walton; Amy J Vassallo; Joel Fundaun; Marie Wasielewski; D Mark Courtney
Journal:  Am J Emerg Med       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 2.469

5.  Morphological changes in the cervical muscles of women with chronic whiplash can be modified with exercise-A pilot study.

Authors:  Shaun O'leary; Gwendolen Jull; Luke Van Wyk; Ashley Pedler; James Elliott
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.217

6.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging Technologies Crucial to Our Understanding of Spinal Conditions?

Authors:  Rebecca J Crawford; Maryse Fortin; Kenneth A Weber; Andrew Smith; James M Elliott
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 4.751

7.  Advancements in Imaging Technology: Do They (or Will They) Equate to Advancements in Our Knowledge of Recovery in Whiplash?

Authors:  James M Elliott; Sudarshan Dayanidhi; Charles Hazle; Mark A Hoggarth; Jacob McPherson; Cheryl L Sparks; Kenneth A Weber
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  Inter-rater reliability of trunk muscle morphometric analysis.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Tobey DeMott Yeates; Theresia Licka; James Elliott
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.398

9.  The qualitative grading of muscle fat infiltration in whiplash using fat and water magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Rebecca Abbott; Anneli Peolsson; Janne West; James M Elliott; Ulrika Åslund; Anette Karlsson; Olof Dahlqvist Leinhard
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 4.166

10.  Age and side-related morphometric MRI evaluation of trunk muscles in people without back pain.

Authors:  Stephanie Valentin; Theresia Licka; James Elliott
Journal:  Man Ther       Date:  2014-07-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.