Literature DB >> 22309270

Comparison of in-vivo and in-silico methods used for prediction of tissue: plasma partition coefficients in rat.

Helen Graham1, Mike Walker, Owen Jones, James Yates, Aleksandra Galetin, Leon Aarons.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To use methods from the literature to predict rat tissue:plasma partition coefficients (Kps) and volume of distribution values. Determine which model provides the most accurate predictions to increase confidence in the use of predicted pharmacokinetic parameters in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling.
METHODS: Six models were used to predict Kps and four to predict V(ss) for a dataset of 81 compounds in 11 rat tissues, and the predictions were compared with experimentally derived values. KEY
FINDINGS: Kp predictions made by the Rodgers et al. model were the most accurate, with 77% within threefold of experimental values. The Poulin & Theil model was the most accurate for the prediction of V(ss) , with 87% of predictions within threefold.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that in-silico models available in the literature can be used to accurately predict Kp and V(ss) in rat. The Rodgers et al. model has been shown to provide the most accurate Kp predictions, with consistent accuracy across all drug classes and tissues. It was also the most accurate V(ss) predictor when no in-vivo data were used as input. However, transporter systems and other mechanisms that are not yet fully understood need to be incorporated into these types of models in the future to further increase their applicability.
© 2011 The Authors. JPP © 2011 Royal Pharmaceutical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22309270     DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.2011.01429.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol        ISSN: 0022-3573            Impact factor:   3.765


  19 in total

1.  Prediction of Tissue-to-Plasma Ratios of Basic Compounds in Mice.

Authors:  Prashant B Nigade; Jayasagar Gundu; K Sreedhara Pai; Kumar V S Nemmani
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.441

2.  Revisiting a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model for cocaine with a forensic scope.

Authors:  María Elena Bravo-Gómez; Laura Nayeli Camacho-García; Luz Alejandra Castillo-Alanís; Miguel Ángel Mendoza-Meléndez; Alejandra Quijano-Mateos
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2019-03-13       Impact factor: 3.524

Review 3.  Dose selection based on physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) approaches.

Authors:  Hannah M Jones; Kapil Mayawala; Patrick Poulin
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 4.009

4.  Development of a Translational Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Model for Antibody-Drug Conjugates: a Case Study with T-DM1.

Authors:  Antari Khot; Jay Tibbitts; Dan Rock; Dhaval K Shah
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Modeling Corticosteroid Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics, Part I: Determination and Prediction of Dexamethasone and Methylprednisolone Tissue Binding in the Rat.

Authors:  Vivaswath S Ayyar; Dawei Song; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 4.030

6.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of the Rodgers and Rowland Model for Prediction of Tissue: Plasma Partitioning Coefficients: Assessment of the Key Physiological and Physicochemical Factors That Determine Small-Molecule Tissue Distribution.

Authors:  Estelle Yau; Andrés Olivares-Morales; Michael Gertz; Neil Parrott; Adam S Darwich; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.009

7.  Prediction of Tumor-to-Plasma Ratios of Basic Compounds in Subcutaneous Xenograft Mouse Models.

Authors:  Prashant B Nigade; Jayasagar Gundu; K Sreedhara Pai; Kumar V S Nemmani
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.441

8.  Prediction of Tissue-Plasma Partition Coefficients Using Microsomal Partitioning: Incorporation into Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Models and Steady-State Volume of Distribution Predictions.

Authors:  Kimberly Holt; Min Ye; Swati Nagar; Ken Korzekwa
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2019-07-19       Impact factor: 3.922

9.  Drug Distribution Part 2. Predicting Volume of Distribution from Plasma Protein Binding and Membrane Partitioning.

Authors:  Ken Korzekwa; Swati Nagar
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 10.  Prediction of drug disposition on the basis of its chemical structure.

Authors:  David Stepensky
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.