OBJECTIVES: To use methods from the literature to predict rat tissue:plasma partition coefficients (Kps) and volume of distribution values. Determine which model provides the most accurate predictions to increase confidence in the use of predicted pharmacokinetic parameters in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. METHODS: Six models were used to predict Kps and four to predict V(ss) for a dataset of 81 compounds in 11 rat tissues, and the predictions were compared with experimentally derived values. KEY FINDINGS: Kp predictions made by the Rodgers et al. model were the most accurate, with 77% within threefold of experimental values. The Poulin & Theil model was the most accurate for the prediction of V(ss) , with 87% of predictions within threefold. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that in-silico models available in the literature can be used to accurately predict Kp and V(ss) in rat. The Rodgers et al. model has been shown to provide the most accurate Kp predictions, with consistent accuracy across all drug classes and tissues. It was also the most accurate V(ss) predictor when no in-vivo data were used as input. However, transporter systems and other mechanisms that are not yet fully understood need to be incorporated into these types of models in the future to further increase their applicability.
OBJECTIVES: To use methods from the literature to predict rat tissue:plasma partition coefficients (Kps) and volume of distribution values. Determine which model provides the most accurate predictions to increase confidence in the use of predicted pharmacokinetic parameters in physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling. METHODS: Six models were used to predict Kps and four to predict V(ss) for a dataset of 81 compounds in 11 rat tissues, and the predictions were compared with experimentally derived values. KEY FINDINGS: Kp predictions made by the Rodgers et al. model were the most accurate, with 77% within threefold of experimental values. The Poulin & Theil model was the most accurate for the prediction of V(ss) , with 87% of predictions within threefold. CONCLUSIONS: This study has shown that in-silico models available in the literature can be used to accurately predict Kp and V(ss) in rat. The Rodgers et al. model has been shown to provide the most accurate Kp predictions, with consistent accuracy across all drug classes and tissues. It was also the most accurate V(ss) predictor when no in-vivo data were used as input. However, transporter systems and other mechanisms that are not yet fully understood need to be incorporated into these types of models in the future to further increase their applicability.
Authors: Prashant B Nigade; Jayasagar Gundu; K Sreedhara Pai; Kumar V S Nemmani Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2017-10 Impact factor: 2.441
Authors: María Elena Bravo-Gómez; Laura Nayeli Camacho-García; Luz Alejandra Castillo-Alanís; Miguel Ángel Mendoza-Meléndez; Alejandra Quijano-Mateos Journal: Toxicol Res (Camb) Date: 2019-03-13 Impact factor: 3.524
Authors: Vivaswath S Ayyar; Dawei Song; Debra C DuBois; Richard R Almon; William J Jusko Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 2019-06-13 Impact factor: 4.030
Authors: Estelle Yau; Andrés Olivares-Morales; Michael Gertz; Neil Parrott; Adam S Darwich; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro Journal: AAPS J Date: 2020-02-03 Impact factor: 4.009
Authors: Prashant B Nigade; Jayasagar Gundu; K Sreedhara Pai; Kumar V S Nemmani Journal: Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 2.441