Literature DB >> 31324699

Prediction of Tissue-Plasma Partition Coefficients Using Microsomal Partitioning: Incorporation into Physiologically based Pharmacokinetic Models and Steady-State Volume of Distribution Predictions.

Kimberly Holt1, Min Ye1, Swati Nagar1, Ken Korzekwa2.   

Abstract

Drug distribution is a necessary component of models to predict human pharmacokinetics. A new membrane-based tissue-plasma partition coefficient (K p) method (K p,mem) to predict unbound tissue to plasma partition coefficients (K pu) was developed using in vitro membrane partitioning [fraction unbound in microsomes (f um)], plasma protein binding, and log P The resulting K p values were used in a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to predict the steady-state volume of distribution (V ss) and concentration-time (C-t) profiles for 19 drugs. These results were compared with K p predictions using a standard method [the differential phospholipid K p prediction method (K p,dPL)], which differentiates between acidic and neutral phospholipids. The K p,mem method was parameterized using published rat K pu data and tissue lipid composition. The K pu values were well predicted with R 2 = 0.8. When used in a PBPK model, the V ss predictions were within 2-fold error for 12 of 19 drugs for K p,mem versus 11 of 19 for Kp,dPL With one outlier removed for K p,mem and two for K p,dPL, the V ss predictions for R 2 were 0.80 and 0.79 for the K p,mem and K p,dPL methods, respectively. The C-t profiles were also predicted and compared. Overall, the K p,mem method predicted the V ss and C-t profiles equally or better than the K p,dPL method. An advantage of using f um to parameterize membrane partitioning is that f um data are used for clearance prediction and are, therefore, generated early in the discovery/development process. Also, the method provides a mechanistically sound basis for membrane partitioning and permeability for further improving PBPK models. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: A new method to predict tissue-plasma partition coefficients was developed. The method provides a more mechanistic basis to model membrane partitioning.
Copyright © 2019 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31324699      PMCID: PMC6750188          DOI: 10.1124/dmd.119.087973

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos        ISSN: 0090-9556            Impact factor:   3.922


  77 in total

1.  Spectrophotometric study of aqueous solutions of warfarin sodium.

Authors:  C F HISKEY; E BULLOCK; G WHITMAN
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1962-01       Impact factor: 3.534

2.  Quantitative structure-pharmacokinetic relationship modelling: apparent volume of distribution.

Authors:  Taravat Ghafourian; Mohammad Barzegar-Jalali; Nasim Hakimiha; Mark T D Cronin
Journal:  J Pharm Pharmacol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 3.765

3.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modelling 2: predicting the tissue distribution of acids, very weak bases, neutrals and zwitterions.

Authors:  Trudy Rodgers; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.534

4.  Compartmental models for apical efflux by P-glycoprotein--part 1: evaluation of model complexity.

Authors:  Swati Nagar; Jalia Tucker; Erica A Weiskircher; Siddhartha Bhoopathy; Ismael J Hidalgo; Ken Korzekwa
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2013-09-10       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Absolute bioavailability and dose proportionality of betaxolol in normal healthy subjects.

Authors:  T M Ludden; D A Boyle; D Gieseker; G T Kennedy; M H Crawford; L K Ludden; W A Clementi
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  A computer perspective of membranes: molecular dynamics studies of lipid bilayer systems.

Authors:  D P Tieleman; S J Marrink; H J Berendsen
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  1997-11-21

7.  Felodipine kinetics in healthy men.

Authors:  B Edgar; C G Regårdh; G Johnsson; L Johansson; P Lundborg; I Löfberg; O Rönn
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1985-08       Impact factor: 6.875

8.  Prediction of human volume of distribution values for neutral and basic drugs. 2. Extended data set and leave-class-out statistics.

Authors:  Franco Lombardo; R Scott Obach; Marina Y Shalaeva; Feng Gao
Journal:  J Med Chem       Date:  2004-02-26       Impact factor: 7.446

9.  The pharmacology of verapamil. IV. Kinetic and dynamic effects after single intravenous and oral doses.

Authors:  R G McAllister; E B Kirsten
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 6.875

10.  A study of the effect of aspirin on the pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous diclofenac sodium.

Authors:  J V Willis; M J Kendall; D B Jack
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.953

View more
  8 in total

1.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of the Rodgers and Rowland Model for Prediction of Tissue: Plasma Partitioning Coefficients: Assessment of the Key Physiological and Physicochemical Factors That Determine Small-Molecule Tissue Distribution.

Authors:  Estelle Yau; Andrés Olivares-Morales; Michael Gertz; Neil Parrott; Adam S Darwich; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  IVIVE: Facilitating the Use of In Vitro Toxicity Data in Risk Assessment and Decision Making.

Authors:  Xiaoqing Chang; Yu-Mei Tan; David G Allen; Shannon Bell; Paul C Brown; Lauren Browning; Patricia Ceger; Jeffery Gearhart; Pertti J Hakkinen; Shruti V Kabadi; Nicole C Kleinstreuer; Annie Lumen; Joanna Matheson; Alicia Paini; Heather A Pangburn; Elijah J Petersen; Emily N Reinke; Alexandre J S Ribeiro; Nisha Sipes; Lisa M Sweeney; John F Wambaugh; Ronald Wange; Barbara A Wetmore; Moiz Mumtaz
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2022-05-01

3.  Predicting Impact of Food and Feeding Time on Oral Absorption of Drugs with a Novel Rat Continuous Intestinal Absorption Model.

Authors:  Casey Radice; Ken Korzekwa; Swati Nagar
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2022-03-26       Impact factor: 3.579

4.  Overcoming differential tumor penetration of BRAF inhibitors using computationally guided combination therapy.

Authors:  Thomas S C Ng; Huiyu Hu; Stefan Kronister; Chanseo Lee; Ran Li; Luca Gerosa; Sylwia A Stopka; Danielle M Burgenske; Ishaan Khurana; Michael S Regan; Sreeram Vallabhaneni; Niharika Putta; Ella Scott; Dylan Matvey; Anita Giobbie-Hurder; Rainer H Kohler; Jann N Sarkaria; Sareh Parangi; Peter K Sorger; Nathalie Y R Agar; Heather A Jacene; Ryan J Sullivan; Elizabeth Buchbinder; Hannes Mikula; Ralph Weissleder; Miles A Miller
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 14.957

5.  Using partition analysis as a facile method to derive net clearances.

Authors:  Ken Korzekwa; Jaydeep Yadav; Swati Nagar
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-06-02       Impact factor: 4.438

6.  A permeability- and perfusion-based PBPK model for improved prediction of concentration-time profiles.

Authors:  Ken Korzekwa; Casey Radice; Swati Nagar
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 4.438

Review 7.  Considerations to Be Taken When Carrying Out Medicinal Plant Research-What We Learn from an Insight into the IC50 Values, Bioavailability and Clinical Efficacy of Exemplary Anti-Inflammatory Herbal Components.

Authors:  Mona Abdel-Tawab
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-06

8.  A hybrid modeling approach for assessing mechanistic models of small molecule partitioning in vivo using a machine learning-integrated modeling platform.

Authors:  Victor Antontsev; Aditya Jagarapu; Yogesh Bundey; Hypatia Hou; Maksim Khotimchenko; Jason Walsh; Jyotika Varshney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-05-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.