Literature DB >> 22308163

Explosive neuromuscular performance of males versus females.

Ricci Hannah1, Claire Minshull, Matthew W Buckthorpe, Jonathan P Folland.   

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to investigate sex-related differences in explosive muscular force production, as measured by electromechanical delay (EMD) and rate of force development (RFD), and to examine the physiological mechanisms responsible for any differences. The neuromuscular performance of untrained males (n = 20) and females (n = 20) was assessed during a series of isometric knee extension contractions; explosive and maximal voluntary efforts, as well as supramaximal evoked twitches and octets (eight pulses at 300 Hz). Evoked and voluntary EMD were determined from twitch and explosive contractions. The RFD was recorded over consecutive 50 ms time windows from force onset during evoked and explosive contractions, and normalized to maximal strength. Neuromuscular activity during explosive voluntary contractions was measured with EMG of the superficial knee extensors normalized to maximal M-wave. Muscle size (thickness) and muscle-tendon unit (MTU) stiffness were assessed using ultrasonic images of the vastus lateralis at rest and during ramped contractions. Males and females had similar evoked and voluntary EMD. Males were 33% stronger (P < 0.001) and their absolute RFD was 26-56% greater (all time points P < 0.05) compared with females. Muscle size (P < 0.001) and absolute MTU stiffness were also greater for males (P < 0.05). However, normalized RFD was similar for both sexes during the first 150 ms of the explosive voluntary contractions (P > 0.05). This was consistent with the similar normalized twitch and octet RFD, MTU stiffness and agonist EMG (all P > 0.05). When differences in maximal strength were accounted for, the evoked capacity of the knee extensors for explosive force production and the ability to utilize that capacity during explosive voluntary contractions was similar for males and females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22308163     DOI: 10.1113/expphysiol.2011.063420

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Physiol        ISSN: 0958-0670            Impact factor:   2.969


  21 in total

1.  Explosive hamstrings-to-quadriceps force ratio of males versus females.

Authors:  Ricci Hannah; Jonathan P Folland; Stephanie L Smith; Claire Minshull
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Influence of Sex and Maximum Strength on Reactive Strength Index-Modified.

Authors:  George K Beckham; Timothy J Suchomel; Christopher J Sole; Christopher A Bailey; Jacob L Grazer; Steven B Kim; Kasie B Talbot; Michael H Stone
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  The increase in surface EMG could be a misleading measure of neural adaptation during the early gains in strength.

Authors:  Todor I Arabadzhiev; Vladimir G Dimitrov; George V Dimitrov
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-05-01       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Is the joint-angle specificity of isometric resistance training real? And if so, does it have a neural basis?

Authors:  Marcel B Lanza; Thomas G Balshaw; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-09-14       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Comparison of Quadriceps and Hamstring Muscle Activity during an Isometric Squat between Strength-Matched Men and Women.

Authors:  Sophia Nimphius; Jeffrey M McBride; Paige E Rice; Courtney L Goodman-Capps; Christopher R Capps
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Contralateral strength training attenuates muscle performance loss following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a randomised-controlled trial.

Authors:  Claire Minshull; Peter Gallacher; Simon Roberts; Andrew Barnett; Jan Herman Kuiper; Andrea Bailey
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  The rate of force development scaling factor: a review of underlying factors, assessment methods and potential for practical applications.

Authors:  Žiga Kozinc; Darjan Smajla; Nejc Šarabon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Comparison of upper body strength gains between men and women after 10 weeks of resistance training.

Authors:  Paulo Gentil; James Steele; Maria C Pereira; Rafael P M Castanheira; Antonio Paoli; Martim Bottaro
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 2.984

9.  Bilateral deficit in explosive force production is not caused by changes in agonist neural drive.

Authors:  Matthew W Buckthorpe; Matthew T G Pain; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Rate of force development: physiological and methodological considerations.

Authors:  Nicola A Maffiuletti; Per Aagaard; Anthony J Blazevich; Jonathan Folland; Neale Tillin; Jacques Duchateau
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-03-03       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.