BACKGROUND: Cystatin C level predicts mortality more strongly than serum creatinine level. It is unknown whether this advantage extends to other outcomes, such as kidney failure, or whether other novel renal filtration markers share this advantage in predicting outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 9,988 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a population-based study in 4 US communities, followed for approximately 10 years. PREDICTORS: Serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (eGFR(CKD-EPI)) and cystatin C, β-trace protein (BTP), and β(2)-microglobulin (B2M) levels. OUTCOMES: Mortality, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and kidney failure. RESULTS: Higher cystatin C and B2M concentrations were associated more strongly with mortality (n = 1,425) than BTP level and all were associated more strongly than eGFR(CKD-EPI) (adjusted HR for the upper 6.7 percentile compared with the lowest quintile: 1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9] for eGFR(CKD-EPI), 2.9 [95% CI, 2.3-3.6] for cystatin C level, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.5-2.4] for BTP level, and 3.0 [95% CI, 2.4-3.8] for B2M level). Similar patterns were observed for coronary heart disease (n = 1,279), heart failure (n = 803), and kidney failure (n = 130). The addition of cystatin C, BTP, and B2M levels to models including eGFR(CKD-EPI) and all covariates, including urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, significantly improved risk prediction for all outcomes (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: No direct measurement of GFR. CONCLUSIONS: B2M and, to a lesser extent, BTP levels share cystatin C's advantage over eGFR(CKD-EPI) in predicting outcomes, including kidney failure. These additional markers may be helpful in improving estimation of risk associated with decreased kidney function beyond current estimates based on eGFR(CKD-EPI).
BACKGROUND:Cystatin C level predicts mortality more strongly than serum creatinine level. It is unknown whether this advantage extends to other outcomes, such as kidney failure, or whether other novel renal filtration markers share this advantage in predicting outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort study. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 9,988 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a population-based study in 4 US communities, followed for approximately 10 years. PREDICTORS: Serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (eGFR(CKD-EPI)) and cystatin C, β-trace protein (BTP), and β(2)-microglobulin (B2M) levels. OUTCOMES: Mortality, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and kidney failure. RESULTS: Higher cystatin C and B2M concentrations were associated more strongly with mortality (n = 1,425) than BTP level and all were associated more strongly than eGFR(CKD-EPI) (adjusted HR for the upper 6.7 percentile compared with the lowest quintile: 1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9] for eGFR(CKD-EPI), 2.9 [95% CI, 2.3-3.6] for cystatin C level, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.5-2.4] for BTP level, and 3.0 [95% CI, 2.4-3.8] for B2M level). Similar patterns were observed for coronary heart disease (n = 1,279), heart failure (n = 803), and kidney failure (n = 130). The addition of cystatin C, BTP, and B2M levels to models including eGFR(CKD-EPI) and all covariates, including urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, significantly improved risk prediction for all outcomes (P < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: No direct measurement of GFR. CONCLUSIONS:B2M and, to a lesser extent, BTP levels share cystatin C's advantage over eGFR(CKD-EPI) in predicting outcomes, including kidney failure. These additional markers may be helpful in improving estimation of risk associated with decreased kidney function beyond current estimates based on eGFR(CKD-EPI).
Authors: A D White; A R Folsom; L E Chambless; A R Sharret; K Yang; D Conwill; M Higgins; O D Williams; H A Tyroler Journal: J Clin Epidemiol Date: 1996-02 Impact factor: 6.437
Authors: Joshua A Keefe; Shih-Jen Hwang; Tianxiao Huan; Michael Mendelson; Chen Yao; Paul Courchesne; Mohamed A Saleh; Meena S Madhur; Daniel Levy Journal: Hypertension Date: 2019-02 Impact factor: 10.190
Authors: K Žamboch; K Krejčí; J Škarda; M Tichý; I Überall; P Skýpalová; K Langová; D Stejskal; M Švesták; J Zahálková; V Ščudla; J Zadražil Journal: Int Urol Nephrol Date: 2015-05-01 Impact factor: 2.370
Authors: Anna E Prizment; Amy M Linabery; Pamela L Lutsey; Elizabeth Selvin; Heather H Nelson; Aaron R Folsom; Timothy R Church; Charles G Drake; Elizabeth A Platz; Corinne Joshu Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2016-02-05 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Xun Liu; Meredith C Foster; Hocine Tighiouart; Amanda H Anderson; Gerald J Beck; Gabriel Contreras; Josef Coresh; John H Eckfeldt; Harold I Feldman; Tom Greene; L Lee Hamm; Jiang He; Edward Horwitz; Julia Lewis; Ana C Ricardo; Haochang Shou; Raymond R Townsend; Matthew R Weir; Lesley A Inker; Andrew S Levey Journal: Am J Kidney Dis Date: 2016-09-20 Impact factor: 8.860
Authors: Anandita Agarwala; Salim Virani; David Couper; Lloyd Chambless; Eric Boerwinkle; Brad C Astor; Ron C Hoogeveen; Joe Coresh; A Richey Sharrett; Aaron R Folsom; Tom Mosley; Christie M Ballantyne; Vijay Nambi Journal: Atherosclerosis Date: 2016-08-25 Impact factor: 5.162
Authors: Adrienne Tin; Brad C Astor; Eric Boerwinkle; Ron C Hoogeveen; Josef Coresh; W H Linda Kao Journal: Nephrol Dial Transplant Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 5.992