Literature DB >> 22305642

High rate mesophilic, thermophilic, and temperature phased anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge: a pilot scale study.

David Bolzonella1, Cristina Cavinato, Francesco Fatone, Paolo Pavan, Franco Cecchi.   

Abstract

The paper reports the findings of a two-year pilot scale experimental trial for the mesophilic (35°C), thermophilic (55°C) and temperature phased (65+55°C) anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. During the mesophilic and thermophilic runs, the reactor operated at an organic loading rate of 2.2 kgVS/m(3)d and a hydraulic retention time of 20 days. In the temperature phased run, the first reactor operated at an organic loading rate of 15 kgVS/m(3)d and a hydraulic retention time of 2 days while the second reactor operated at an organic loading rate of 2.2 kgVS/m(3)d and a hydraulic retention time of 18 days (20 days for the whole temperature phased system). The performance of the reactor improved with increases in temperature. The COD removal increased from 35% in mesophilic conditions, to 45% in thermophilic conditions, and 55% in the two stage temperature phased system. As a consequence, the specific biogas production increased from 0.33 to 0.45 and to 0.49 m(3)/kgVS(fed) at 35, 55, and 65+55°C, respectively. The extreme thermophilic reactor working at 65°C showed a high hydrolytic capability and a specific yield of 0.33 g COD (soluble) per gVS(fed). The effluent of the extreme thermophilic reactor showed an average concentration of soluble COD and volatile fatty acids of 20 and 9 g/l, respectively. Acetic and propionic acids were the main compounds found in the acids mixture. Because of the improved digestion efficiency, organic nitrogen and phosphorus were solubilised in the bulk. Their concentration, however, did not increase as expected because of the formation of salts of hydroxyapatite and struvite inside the reactor.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22305642     DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Waste Manag        ISSN: 0956-053X            Impact factor:   7.145


  6 in total

Review 1.  Woody biomass as a potential feedstock for fermentative gaseous biofuel production.

Authors:  Suren L J Wijeyekoon; Alankar A Vaidya
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Quantitative Metaproteomics Highlight the Metabolic Contributions of Uncultured Phylotypes in a Thermophilic Anaerobic Digester.

Authors:  Live H Hagen; Jeremy A Frank; Mirzaman Zamanzadeh; Vincent G H Eijsink; Phillip B Pope; Svein J Horn; Magnus Ø Arntzen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Ammonia as an In Situ Sanitizer: Influence of Virus Genome Type on Inactivation.

Authors:  Loïc Decrey; Shinobu Kazama; Tamar Kohn
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 4.  A critical review of biogas production and usage with legislations framework across the globe.

Authors:  S Abanades; H Abbaspour; A Ahmadi; B Das; M A Ehyaei; F Esmaeilion; M El Haj Assad; T Hajilounezhad; D H Jamali; A Hmida; H A Ozgoli; S Safari; M AlShabi; E H Bani-Hani
Journal:  Int J Environ Sci Technol (Tehran)       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 3.519

5.  Enhancing methane production from lignocellulosic biomass by combined steam-explosion pretreatment and bioaugmentation with cellulolytic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor bescii.

Authors:  Daniel Girma Mulat; Silvia Greses Huerta; Dayanand Kalyani; Svein Jarle Horn
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Anaerobic Codigestion of Sludge: Addition of Butcher's Fat Waste as a Cosubstrate for Increasing Biogas Production.

Authors:  E J Martínez; M V Gil; C Fernandez; J G Rosas; X Gómez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.