Literature DB >> 22303835

Quantitative analysis in magnetic resonance spectroscopy: from metabolic profiling to in vivo biomarkers.

Natalie J Serkova1, Mark S Brown.   

Abstract

Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (called NMR for ex vivo techniques and MRS for in vivo techniques) has become a useful analytical and diagnostic tool in biomedicine. In the past two decades, an MR-based spectroscopic approach for translational and clinical research has emerged that allows for biochemical characterization of the tissue of interest either ex vivo (NMR-based metabolomics) or in vivo (localized MRS-single voxel or multivoxel-spectroscopic imaging). The greatest advantages of MRS techniques are their ability to detect multiple tissue-specific metabolites in a single experiment, their quantitative nature and translational component (in vitro/ex vivo-discovered metabolic biomarkers can be translated into noninvasive spectroscopic imaging protocols). Disadvantages of MRS include low sensitivity and spectral resolution and, in case of NMR-metabolomics, metabolite degradation and incomplete recovery in processed samples. In vivo MRS has worse spectral resolution than ex vivo high-resolution NMR due to the inherently wider lines of metabolites in vivo and the difficulty of using traditional line-narrowing methods (e.g., sample spinning). It also suffers from poor time-resolution, therefore offering fewer metabolic biomarkers to be followed in vivo. In the present review article, we provide considerations for establishing reliable protocols (both in vivo and ex vivo) for metabolite detection, recovery and quantification from in vivo and ex vivo MR spectra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22303835     DOI: 10.4155/bio.11.320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioanalysis        ISSN: 1757-6180            Impact factor:   2.681


  25 in total

1.  Training in metabolomics research. I. Designing the experiment, collecting and extracting samples and generating metabolomics data.

Authors:  Stephen Barnes; H Paul Benton; Krista Casazza; Sara J Cooper; Xiangqin Cui; Xiuxia Du; Jeffrey Engler; Janusz H Kabarowski; Shuzhao Li; Wimal Pathmasiri; Jeevan K Prasain; Matthew B Renfrow; Hemant K Tiwari
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.982

2.  Blood Metabolomic Predictors of 1-Year Outcome in Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Rickard L Sjöberg; Tommy Bergenheim; Lina Mörén; Henrik Antti; Cecilia Lindgren; Silvana Naredi; Peter Lindvall
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.210

3.  CEST-MRI detects metabolite levels altered by breast cancer cell aggressiveness and chemotherapy response.

Authors:  Kannie W Y Chan; Lu Jiang; Menglin Cheng; Jannie P Wijnen; Guanshu Liu; Peng Huang; Peter C M van Zijl; Michael T McMahon; Kristine Glunde
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.044

4.  Evaluation of sample preparation protocols for quantitative NMR-based metabolomics.

Authors:  Olga A Snytnikova; Anastasiya A Khlichkina; Renad Z Sagdeev; Yuri P Tsentalovich
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.290

5.  Macrophage-Mediated Clofazimine Sequestration Is Accompanied by a Shift in Host Energy Metabolism.

Authors:  Julie Trexel; Gi S Yoon; Rahul K Keswani; Cora McHugh; Larisa Yeomans; Victor Vitvitsky; Ruma Banerjee; Sudha Sud; Yihan Sun; Gus R Rosania; Kathleen A Stringer
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 6.  Universal quantitative NMR analysis of complex natural samples.

Authors:  Charlotte Simmler; José G Napolitano; James B McAlpine; Shao-Nong Chen; Guido F Pauli
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 9.740

Review 7.  Functional MRI for quantitative treatment response prediction in locally advanced rectal cancer.

Authors:  Trang T Pham; Gary P Liney; Karen Wong; Michael B Barton
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Pharmacometabolomics of l-carnitine treatment response phenotypes in patients with septic shock.

Authors:  Michael A Puskarich; Michael A Finkel; Alla Karnovsky; Alan E Jones; Julie Trexel; Brooke N Harris; Kathleen A Stringer
Journal:  Ann Am Thorac Soc       Date:  2015-01

Review 9.  Biological markers in noninvasive brain stimulation trials in major depressive disorder: a systematic review.

Authors:  Thiago M Fidalgo; J Leon Morales-Quezada; Guilherme S C Muzy; Noelle M Chiavetta; Mariana E Mendonca; Marcus V B Santana; Oscar F Goncalves; Andre R Brunoni; Felipe Fregni
Journal:  J ECT       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.635

10.  Metabolomic characterization of experimental ovarian cancer ascitic fluid.

Authors:  Santosh K Bharti; Flonné Wildes; Chien-Fu Hung; T C Wu; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Marie-France Penet
Journal:  Metabolomics       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 4.290

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.