BACKGROUND: Retrograde drilling for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) remains a challenging operation. PURPOSE: A novel radiation-free electromagnetic navigation system (ENS)-based method was developed and its feasibility and accuracy for retrograde drilling procedures evaluated and compared with the standard freehand fluoroscopic method in an experimental setting. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A controlled laboratory study with 16 standard freehand fluoroscopically and 16 electromagnetically guided retrograde drilling procedures was performed on 8 cadaveric human knees. Four artificial cartilage lesions (2 on each condyle) were set per knee. Drilling accuracy was determined by final distance from the tip of the drill bit to the tip of the probe hook (D1) and distance between the tip of the drill and the marked lesion on the cartilage surface (D2). Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times were documented, as were directional readjustments or complete restarts. All procedures were timed using a stopwatch. RESULTS: Successful retrograde drilling was accomplished in all 16 cases using the novel ENS-based method and in 11 cases using the standard fluoroscopic technique. The overall mean time for the fluoroscopy-guided procedures was 10 minutes 55 seconds ± 3 minutes 19 seconds and for the ENS method was 5 minutes 34 seconds ± 38 seconds, providing a mean time benefit of 5 minutes 35 seconds (P < .001). Mean D1 was 3.8 ± 1.6 mm for the standard and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm using the ENS technique (P = .021), and mean D2 was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm for the standard and 0.9 ± 0.7 mm for the ENS-based method (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard fluoroscopic technique, the novel ENS-based method used in this study showed superior accuracy, required less time, and utilized no radiation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The novel method improves a standard operating procedure in terms of accuracy, operation time for the retrograde drilling procedure, and radiation exposure.
BACKGROUND: Retrograde drilling for osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) remains a challenging operation. PURPOSE: A novel radiation-free electromagnetic navigation system (ENS)-based method was developed and its feasibility and accuracy for retrograde drilling procedures evaluated and compared with the standard freehand fluoroscopic method in an experimental setting. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: A controlled laboratory study with 16 standard freehand fluoroscopically and 16 electromagnetically guided retrograde drilling procedures was performed on 8 cadaveric human knees. Four artificial cartilage lesions (2 on each condyle) were set per knee. Drilling accuracy was determined by final distance from the tip of the drill bit to the tip of the probe hook (D1) and distance between the tip of the drill and the marked lesion on the cartilage surface (D2). Intraoperative fluoroscopy exposure times were documented, as were directional readjustments or complete restarts. All procedures were timed using a stopwatch. RESULTS: Successful retrograde drilling was accomplished in all 16 cases using the novel ENS-based method and in 11 cases using the standard fluoroscopic technique. The overall mean time for the fluoroscopy-guided procedures was 10 minutes 55 seconds ± 3 minutes 19 seconds and for the ENS method was 5 minutes 34 seconds ± 38 seconds, providing a mean time benefit of 5 minutes 35 seconds (P < .001). Mean D1 was 3.8 ± 1.6 mm for the standard and 2.3 ± 0.6 mm using the ENS technique (P = .021), and mean D2 was 2.5 ± 1.3 mm for the standard and 0.9 ± 0.7 mm for the ENS-based method (P < .001). CONCLUSION: Compared with the standard fluoroscopic technique, the novel ENS-based method used in this study showed superior accuracy, required less time, and utilized no radiation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The novel method improves a standard operating procedure in terms of accuracy, operation time for the retrograde drilling procedure, and radiation exposure.
Authors: Michael Hoffmann; Maximilian Hartel; Malte Schroeder; Oliver Reinsch; Alexander S Spiro; Andreas H Ruecker; Lars Grossterlinden; Daniel Briem; Johannes M Rueger; Jan Phillip Petersen Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-07-17 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Miguel Pishnamaz; Christoph Wilkmann; Hong-Sik Na; Jochen Pfeffer; Christoph Hänisch; Max Janssen; Philipp Bruners; Philipp Kobbe; Frank Hildebrand; Thomas Schmitz-Rode; Hans-Christoph Pape Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-02-10 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Oliver D Jungesblut; Josephine Berger-Groch; Michael Hoffmann; Malte Schroeder; Kara L Krajewski; Ralf Stuecker; Martin Rupprecht Journal: BMC Musculoskelet Disord Date: 2021-02-03 Impact factor: 2.362
Authors: Jan Theopold; Bastian Marquass; Nikolaus von Dercks; Maria Mütze; Ralf Henkelmann; Christoph Josten; Pierre Hepp Journal: Patient Saf Surg Date: 2015-12-22