Literature DB >> 22301885

Do additional cores from MRI cancer-suspicious lesions to systematic 12-core transrectal prostate biopsy give better cancer detection?

Katsumi Shigemura1, Shin Motoyama, Masuo Yamashita.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The comparison of systematic prostate biopsies (PBx) with PBx including additional cores based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of lesions suspicious for prostate cancer (PCa) has been controversial. This study focuses on additional cores based on MRI findings for better cancer detection.
METHODS: Data were collected from 491 men who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided PBx: a 12-core PBx (group 1: 395 cases) and a 12-core PBx plus 1-3 additional cores based on MRI (group 2: 96 cases). Comparison of two groups revealed how the additional cores taken with MRI findings affected PCa detection.
RESULTS: Group 1 had 205 cases (51.9%) and group 2 had 55 cases (57.3%) of PCa detected. This difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.3444). Only 1 of the 55 patients (1.82%) in group 2 had cancer only in the additional cores based on MRI. In other words, only 1/96 (1.04%) patients was diagnosed with PCa only by the additional core PBx.
CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that systematic 12-core PBx (sextant peripheral zone + 4 transitional zone + 2 far lateral peripheral zone) can be considered an excellent tool for PCa detection and there may be no need for additional cores based on MRI findings for PCa detection.
Copyright © 2012 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301885     DOI: 10.1159/000334375

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

1.  The Efficacy of Target Biopsy of Suspected Cancer Lesions Detected by Magnetic Resonance Imaging and/or Transrectal Ultrasonography during Initial Prostate Biopsies: Comparison of Outcomes between Two Physicians.

Authors:  Hideto Iwamoto; Tetsuya Yumioka; Noriya Yamaguchi; Seiya Inoue; Toshihiko Masago; Shuichi Morizane; Akihisa Yao; Masashi Honda; Takehiro Sejima; Atsushi Takenaka
Journal:  Yonago Acta Med       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 1.641

2.  MRI-Safe Robot for Endorectal Prostate Biopsy.

Authors:  Dan Stoianovici; Chunwoo Kim; Govindarajan Srimathveeravalli; Peter Sebrecht; Doru Petrisor; Jonathan Coleman; Stephen B Solomon; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  IEEE ASME Trans Mechatron       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 5.303

Review 3.  MRI-targeted prostate biopsy: a review of technique and results.

Authors:  Nicola L Robertson; Mark Emberton; Caroline M Moore
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  3-Tesla magnetic resonance imaging improves the prostate cancer detection rate in transrectral ultrasound-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Jie Chen; Xiao-Lei Yi; Li-Xin Jiang; Ren Wang; Jun-Gong Zhao; Yue-Hua Li; Bing Hu
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.447

Review 5.  Paradigm Shift in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Pre-Biopsy Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Targeted Biopsy.

Authors:  Jung Jae Park; Chan Kyo Kim
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 7.109

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.