OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. METHODS: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ± 20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (A(z)) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of A(z) values: CBCT = 0.811, film = 0.797 and sensor = 0.775; p = 0.771). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of cone beam CT (CBCT) in detecting vertical root fractures and to compare the accuracy with images from an intraoral sensor and from conventional intraoral film. METHODS: 60 extracted, single-rooted human teeth were divided equally into two groups: a control group of 30 teeth and an induced fracture group of 30 teeth. All teeth were randomly placed into sockets in six dry mandibles. Each tooth was imaged by three modalities: CBCT, intraoral digital radiography and intraoral F-speed film. Three beam angulations (an orthogonal projection and additional projections with ± 20° horizontal shifts of the central ray) were used when radiographs were made using film and a digital sensor. Three oral and maxillofacial radiologists evaluated the presence of root fractures twice in each image modality using a five-point confidence rating scale. Areas under receiver operating characteristic curves (A(z)) were computed for each observer and modality and were tested for statistical differences using the Kruskal-Wallis test. RESULTS: There was no statistical difference in the performance of the three modalities (mean of A(z) values: CBCT = 0.811, film = 0.797 and sensor = 0.775; p = 0.771). CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between intraoral film, a high-resolution complementary metal oxide semiconductor digital imaging system and CBCT in detecting vertical root fractures in mandibular single-rooted teeth.
Authors: Madhu K Nair; Hans-Göran Gröndahl; Richard L Webber; Umadevi P Nair; James A Wallace Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2003-07
Authors: Ricardo Affonso Bernardes; Ivaldo Gomes de Moraes; Marco Antonio Húngaro Duarte; Bruno C Azevedo; José Ribamar de Azevedo; Clovis Monteiro Bramante Journal: Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod Date: 2009-03-09
Authors: Bassam Hassan; Maria Elissavet Metska; Ahmet Rifat Ozok; Paul van der Stelt; Paul Rudolf Wesselink Journal: J Endod Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.171
Authors: Daniel Berretta Moreira Alves; Fabrício Mesquita Tuji; Fábio Abreu Alves; André Caroli Rocha; Alan Roger Dos Santos-Silva; Pablo Agustin Vargas; Márcio Ajudarte Lopes Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2018-06-05 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: S J M Jakobson; V P D Westphalen; U X Silva Neto; L F Fariniuk; A G D Schroeder; E Carneiro Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2013-11-04 Impact factor: 2.419
Authors: Martina Gerlane de Oliveira Pinto; Saulo L Sousa Melo; Fernanda Clotilde Mariz Suassuna; Luiz Eduardo Marinho; José Bruno da Silva Leite; Andre Ulisses Dantas Batista; Patrícia Meira Bento; Daniela Pita Melo Journal: Dentomaxillofac Radiol Date: 2021-02-10 Impact factor: 3.525