PURPOSE: We present the results of a prospective ten-year follow-up study to prove the effectiveness of a single fraction of 192-Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as a boost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2000, 84 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma, with over 4 mm free margins after conservative surgery, were treated. All cases were stages T1-2, except for one case, a stage T3, 81% pN0, 19% pN1-2. Chemotherapy was used in 47% and hormonal therapy in 87%. Whole breast external beam radiotherapy (46 Gy) was followed 1-2 weeks later by an implant with metallic needles. A 7 Gy single dose of HDR BT to the 90% isodose line was delivered on an outpatient basis. Dosimetry was performed theoretically. This technique is called FAST-boost because the whole treatment is delivered in about two hours. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 120 months, three patients relapsed in the margin of the implant and two in a different quadrant (5/84, 6%). Actuarial local control at five and ten years was 98.5% and 95.6%. Overall survival was 92.7% and 90.2%, and disease-free survival 90.2% and 79.9%. Cosmetic results were good or excellent in 92.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A single-fraction HDR boost with rigid needles (FAST-boost) is a good, quick, simple technique when surgical margins are free.
PURPOSE: We present the results of a prospective ten-year follow-up study to prove the effectiveness of a single fraction of 192-Ir high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy (BT) as a boost. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 1999 and 2000, 84 consecutive patients with invasive breast carcinoma, with over 4 mm free margins after conservative surgery, were treated. All cases were stages T1-2, except for one case, a stage T3, 81% pN0, 19% pN1-2. Chemotherapy was used in 47% and hormonal therapy in 87%. Whole breast external beam radiotherapy (46 Gy) was followed 1-2 weeks later by an implant with metallic needles. A 7 Gy single dose of HDR BT to the 90% isodose line was delivered on an outpatient basis. Dosimetry was performed theoretically. This technique is called FAST-boost because the whole treatment is delivered in about two hours. RESULTS: With a median follow-up of 120 months, three patients relapsed in the margin of the implant and two in a different quadrant (5/84, 6%). Actuarial local control at five and ten years was 98.5% and 95.6%. Overall survival was 92.7% and 90.2%, and disease-free survival 90.2% and 79.9%. Cosmetic results were good or excellent in 92.5%. CONCLUSIONS: A single-fraction HDR boost with rigid needles (FAST-boost) is a good, quick, simple technique when surgical margins are free.
Authors: Jaroslaw T Hepel; Suzanne B Evans; Jessica R Hiatt; Lori Lyn Price; Thomas DiPetrillo; David E Wazer; Stephanie G MacAusland Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-12-10 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: M Clarke; R Collins; S Darby; C Davies; P Elphinstone; V Evans; J Godwin; R Gray; C Hicks; S James; E MacKinnon; P McGale; T McHugh; R Peto; C Taylor; Y Wang Journal: Lancet Date: 2005-12-17 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Jayant S Vaidya; Jeffrey S Tobias; Michael Baum; Frederik Wenz; Uta Kraus-Tiefenbacher; Derek D'souza; Mohammed Keshtgar; Samuele Massarut; Basil Hilaris; Christobel Saunders; David Joseph Journal: Semin Radiat Oncol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 5.934
Authors: C Hennequin; C Durdux; M Espié; S Balla-Mekias; M Housset; M Marty; G Chotin; C Maylin Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 1999-08-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Kevin S Oh; Feng-Ming Kong; Kent A Griffith; Beth Yanke; Lori J Pierce Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-07-25 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Philip Poortmans; Harry Bartelink; Jean-Claude Horiot; Henk Struikmans; Walter Van den Bogaert; Alain Fourquet; Jos Jager; Willem Hoogenraad; Patrick Rodrigus; Carla Wárlám-Rodenhuis; Laurence Collette; Marianne Pierart Journal: Radiother Oncol Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 6.280
Authors: Jose Luis Guinot; Susana Roldan; María Maroñas; Isabel Tortajada; Maria Carrascosa; Maria Luisa Chust; Marian Estornell; Jose Luis Mengual; Leoncio Arribas Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-04-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Brian V Balgobind; Kees Koedooder; Diego Ordoñez Zúñiga; Raquel Dávila Fajardo; Coen R N Rasch; Bradley R Pieters Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2015-08-20 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Aurora Rodríguez Pérez; Maria Concepción López Carrizosa; Pilar Maria Samper Ots; José Fermín Pérez-Regadera Gómez; José Zapatero Ortuño; Juan de Dios Sáez Garrido; Manuel Joaquín Martín de Miguel Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2012-09-14 Impact factor: 3.405
Authors: J Sanz; N Rodríguez; P Foro; J Dengra; A Reig; P Pérez; I Membrive; A Ortiz; M Codinach; M Algara Journal: Clin Transl Oncol Date: 2016-09-21 Impact factor: 3.405