Literature DB >> 22301104

The value of routine pH monitoring in the diagnosis and treatment of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Michael Friedman1, Craig Hamilton, Christian G Samuelson, Kanwar Kelley, Renwick Taylor, Robert Darling, David Taylor, Michelle Fisher, Alexander Maley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the need for pH testing in diagnosing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). STUDY
DESIGN: Case series with planned data collection.
SETTING: Tertiary care center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: On the basis of symptoms and/or abnormal endoscopic findings, more than 500 patients underwent 24-hour pharyngeal pH testing at a single center (using the Dx-pH probe) between January 2009 and June 2011. A total of 163 patients not on proton-pump inhibitors at the time of study and with complete data available for analysis (pH results, body mass index, smoking status, pretest reflux symptom index) were divided into 2 groups by positive (n = 70) and negative (n = 93) Ryan Score. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) was compared between groups and assessed overall against Ryan Score parameters at different pH thresholds. The diagnostic utility of an RSI ≥ 13 for prediction of Ryan Score was assessed.
RESULTS: No significant difference in RSI was seen between Ryan-positive (17.50 ± 11.47) and Ryan-negative (14.95 ± 11.43) patients (P = .161). Overall, RSI correlated poorly with percentage time spent below pH thresholds 6.5, 6.0, 5.5, and 5.0 and upright and supine Ryan parameters at these thresholds (as determined by linear regression analysis). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of RSI ≥ 13 for Ryan positivity were 55.7%, 47.3%, 44.3%, and 58.7%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Our findings show that in our population of otolaryngology patients, the diagnosis of LPR cannot be reliably made on the basis of symptoms alone. Diagnosis, and in particular treatment decisions, should ideally be made on the basis of a combination of symptoms, signs, and confirmatory testing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22301104     DOI: 10.1177/0194599812436952

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  12 in total

Review 1.  Oropharyngeal Reflux Monitoring and Atypical Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.

Authors:  Dhyanesh A Patel; Ali H Harb; Michael F Vaezi
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2016-03

2.  Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Weak Acid and Weaker Correlations.

Authors:  Steven R DeMeester
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Acidic Pharyngeal Reflux Does Not Correlate with Symptoms and Laryngeal Injury Attributed to Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Martin Duricek; Peter Banovcin; Tatiana Halickova; Rudolf Hyrdel; Marian Kollarik
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Baseline impedance via manometry and ambulatory reflux testing are not equivalent when utilized in the evaluation of potential extra-esophageal gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Authors:  Thomas A Zikos; George Triadafilopoulos; Afrin Kamal; Alexander Podboy; Irene S Sonu; Kirsten A Regalia; Monica C Nandwani; Linda A Nguyen; Nielsen Q Fernandez-Becker; John O Clarke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Oropharyngeal pH Testing Does Not Predict Response to Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy in Patients with Laryngeal Symptoms.

Authors:  Rena Yadlapati; John E Pandolfino; Alcina K Lidder; Nadine Shabeeb; Diana-Marie Jaiyeola; Christopher Adkins; Neelima Agrawal; Andrew Cooper; Caroline P E Price; Jody D Ciolino; Andrew J Gawron; Stephanie S Smith; Michiel Bove; Bruce K Tan
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-04-19       Impact factor: 10.864

6.  Halitosis associated volatile sulphur compound levels in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Mehmet Ozgur Avincsal; Aytug Altundag; Seckin Ulusoy; Mehmet Emre Dinc; Abdullah Dalgic; Murat Topak
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-03-05       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Evaluating the incidence, clinical significance and predictors for vocal cord palsy and incidental laryngopharyngeal conditions before elective thyroidectomy: is there a case for routine laryngoscopic examination?

Authors:  Brian Hung-Hin Lang; Kevin Ka-Wan Chu; Raymond King-Yin Tsang; Kai Pun Wong; Birgitta Yee-Hang Wong
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

8.  A Comparison of Alkaline Water and Mediterranean Diet vs Proton Pump Inhibition for Treatment of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux.

Authors:  Craig H Zalvan; Shirley Hu; Barbara Greenberg; Jan Geliebter
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 6.223

9.  Nissen fundoplication vs proton pump inhibitors for laryngopharyngeal reflux based on pH-monitoring and symptom-scale.

Authors:  Chao Zhang; Zhi-Wei Hu; Chao Yan; Qiong Wu; Ji-Min Wu; Xing Du; Dian-Gang Liu; Tao Luo; Fei Li; Zhong-Gao Wang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  The application of 24-hour pharyngeal pH-monitoring and Reflux Finding Score and Reflux Symptom Index questionnaires in the diagnostics of laryngopharyngeal reflux.

Authors:  Elżbieta Włodarczyk; Beata Miaśkiewicz; Danuta Raj-Koziak; Agata Szkiełkowska; Piotr H Skarżyński; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Prz Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.