OBJECTIVES: Birth defects are the leading cause of infant mortality and are responsible for substantial child and adult morbidity. Documenting the variation in prevalence of birth defects among racial/ethnic subpopulations is critical for assessing possible variations in diagnosis, case ascertainment, or risk factors among such groups. METHODS: We used data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program, a population-based birth defects registry with active case ascertainment. We estimated the racial/ethnic variation in prevalence of 46 selected major birth defects among live births, stillbirths, and pregnancy terminations at >20 weeks gestation among mothers residing in the five central counties of metropolitan Atlanta between 1994 and 2005, adjusting for infant sex, maternal age, gravidity, and socioeconomic status (SES). We also explored SES as a potential effect measure modifier. RESULTS: Compared with births to non-Hispanic white women, births to non-Hispanic black women had a significantly higher prevalence of five birth defects and a significantly lower prevalence of 10 birth defects, while births to Hispanic women had a significantly higher prevalence of four birth defects and a significantly lower prevalence of six birth defects. The racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of some defects varied by SES, but no clear pattern emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic disparities were suggested in 57% of included birth defects. Disparities in the prevalence of birth defects may result from different underlying genetic susceptibilities; exposure to risk factors; or variability in case diagnosis, ascertainment, or reporting among the subpopulations examined. Policies that improve early diagnosis of birth defects could reduce associated morbidity and mortality.
OBJECTIVES:Birth defects are the leading cause of infant mortality and are responsible for substantial child and adult morbidity. Documenting the variation in prevalence of birth defects among racial/ethnic subpopulations is critical for assessing possible variations in diagnosis, case ascertainment, or risk factors among such groups. METHODS: We used data from the Metropolitan Atlanta Congenital Defects Program, a population-based birth defects registry with active case ascertainment. We estimated the racial/ethnic variation in prevalence of 46 selected major birth defects among live births, stillbirths, and pregnancy terminations at >20 weeks gestation among mothers residing in the five central counties of metropolitan Atlanta between 1994 and 2005, adjusting for infant sex, maternal age, gravidity, and socioeconomic status (SES). We also explored SES as a potential effect measure modifier. RESULTS: Compared with births to non-Hispanic white women, births to non-Hispanic black women had a significantly higher prevalence of five birth defects and a significantly lower prevalence of 10 birth defects, while births to Hispanic women had a significantly higher prevalence of four birth defects and a significantly lower prevalence of six birth defects. The racial/ethnic disparities in the prevalence of some defects varied by SES, but no clear pattern emerged. CONCLUSIONS: Racial/ethnic disparities were suggested in 57% of included birth defects. Disparities in the prevalence of birth defects may result from different underlying genetic susceptibilities; exposure to risk factors; or variability in case diagnosis, ascertainment, or reporting among the subpopulations examined. Policies that improve early diagnosis of birth defects could reduce associated morbidity and mortality.
Authors: Samantha E Parker; Cara T Mai; Mark A Canfield; Russel Rickard; Ying Wang; Robert E Meyer; Patrick Anderson; Craig A Mason; Julianne S Collins; Russell S Kirby; Adolfo Correa Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2010-09-28
Authors: N Krieger; J T Chen; P D Waterman; M-J Soobader; S V Subramanian; R Carson Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2003-03 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: Tunu Ramadhani; Vanessa Short; Mark A Canfield; D Kim Waller; Adolfo Correa; Marjorie Royle; Angela Scheuerle Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2009-09
Authors: Mikyong Shin; James E Kucik; Csaba Siffel; Chengxing Lu; Gary M Shaw; Mark A Canfield; Adolfo Correa Journal: J Pediatr Date: 2012-06-23 Impact factor: 4.406
Authors: April L Dawson; Cynthia H Cassell; Matthew E Oster; Richard S Olney; Jean Paul Tanner; Russell S Kirby; Jane Correia; Scott D Grosse Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2014-08-13
Authors: Kelesitse Phiri; Sonia Hernandez-Diaz; Kate B Dugan; Paige L Williams; Judith A Dudley; Astride Jules; S Todd Callahan; George R Seage; William O Cooper Journal: Pediatr Infect Dis J Date: 2014-07 Impact factor: 2.129
Authors: Regina M Simeone; Sarah C Tinker; Suzanne M Gilboa; A J Agopian; Matthew E Oster; Owen J Devine; Margaret A Honein Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2016-10-26 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Cheryl S Broussard; Suzanne M Gilboa; Kyung A Lee; Matthew Oster; Joann R Petrini; Margaret A Honein Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mark A Canfield; Cara T Mai; Ying Wang; Alissa O'Halloran; Lisa K Marengo; Richard S Olney; Christopher L Borger; Rachel Rutkowski; Jane Fornoff; Nila Irwin; Glenn Copeland; Timothy J Flood; Robert E Meyer; Russel Rickard; C J Alverson; Joseph Sweatlock; Russell S Kirby Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: James E Kucik; Wendy N Nembhard; Pamela Donohue; Owen Devine; Ying Wang; Cynthia S Minkovitz; Thomas Burke Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-09-11 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Cara T Mai; James E Kucik; Jennifer Isenburg; Marcia L Feldkamp; Lisa K Marengo; Erin M Bugenske; Phoebe G Thorpe; Jodi M Jackson; Adolfo Correa; Russel Rickard; C J Alverson; Russell S Kirby Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2013-11