Suzan L Carmichael1, Gary M Shaw, Zhanna Kaidarova. 1. March of Dimes Birth Defects Foundation, California Birth Defects Monitoring Program, Berkeley, California 94710, USA. sca@cbdmp.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about risks of most specific birth defects among infants born to U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanic or African-American women. METHODS: Using data from a large population-based registry, we explored risks of selected congenital malformation phenotypes in offspring of U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanic and African-American women, relative to non-Hispanic white women, in California. Approximately 2.2 million live births and stillbirths occurred during the ascertainment period, 1989-1997. Information on maternal racial-ethnic background and other covariates was obtained from birth certificate and fetal death files. RESULTS: Adjusted relative risks (ARRs) for the 20 groupings of malformations designated by three-digit British Pediatric Association (BPA) codes ranged from 0.6 (genital organ malformations, among infants born to foreign-born Hispanics) to 1.7 (anencephaly, also among infants born to foreign-born Hispanics). Grouping by four-digit BPA codes revealed that among infants born to U.S.-born Hispanics, 46 of the ARRs were < or = 0.8 and 12 were > or = 1.3; among infants born to foreign-born Hispanics, 75 of the ARRs were < or = 0.8 and 15 were > or = 1.3; and among infants born to African-American women, 45 ARRs were < or = 0.8 and 25 were > or = 1.3. For each racial-ethnic group of women, the observed variability in risks covered most organ systems. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results suggested that (in comparison with non-Hispanic whites) each racial-ethnic group was more likely to have reduced risk for specific defects (rather than elevated risk), in general, the range of the relative risks was comparatively narrow. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
BACKGROUND: Little is known about risks of most specific birth defects among infants born to U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanic or African-American women. METHODS: Using data from a large population-based registry, we explored risks of selected congenital malformation phenotypes in offspring of U.S.-born and foreign-born Hispanic and African-American women, relative to non-Hispanic white women, in California. Approximately 2.2 million live births and stillbirths occurred during the ascertainment period, 1989-1997. Information on maternal racial-ethnic background and other covariates was obtained from birth certificate and fetal death files. RESULTS: Adjusted relative risks (ARRs) for the 20 groupings of malformations designated by three-digit British Pediatric Association (BPA) codes ranged from 0.6 (genital organ malformations, among infants born to foreign-born Hispanics) to 1.7 (anencephaly, also among infants born to foreign-born Hispanics). Grouping by four-digit BPA codes revealed that among infants born to U.S.-born Hispanics, 46 of the ARRs were < or = 0.8 and 12 were > or = 1.3; among infants born to foreign-born Hispanics, 75 of the ARRs were < or = 0.8 and 15 were > or = 1.3; and among infants born to African-American women, 45 ARRs were < or = 0.8 and 25 were > or = 1.3. For each racial-ethnic group of women, the observed variability in risks covered most organ systems. CONCLUSIONS: Although the results suggested that (in comparison with non-Hispanic whites) each racial-ethnic group was more likely to have reduced risk for specific defects (rather than elevated risk), in general, the range of the relative risks was comparatively narrow. Copyright 2004 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Authors: Cheryl S Broussard; Suzanne M Gilboa; Kyung A Lee; Matthew Oster; Joann R Petrini; Margaret A Honein Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2012-08-20 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Mark A Canfield; Cara T Mai; Ying Wang; Alissa O'Halloran; Lisa K Marengo; Richard S Olney; Christopher L Borger; Rachel Rutkowski; Jane Fornoff; Nila Irwin; Glenn Copeland; Timothy J Flood; Robert E Meyer; Russel Rickard; C J Alverson; Joseph Sweatlock; Russell S Kirby Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Philip J Lupo; Jennifer L Isenburg; Jason L Salemi; Cara T Mai; Rebecca F Liberman; Mark A Canfield; Glenn Copeland; Sarah Haight; Sanjiv Harpavat; Adrienne T Hoyt; Cynthia A Moore; Wendy N Nembhard; Hoang N Nguyen; Rachel E Rutkowski; Amy Steele; C J Alverson; Erin B Stallings; Russell S Kirby Journal: Birth Defects Res Date: 2017-11-01 Impact factor: 2.344
Authors: Callie A M Atta; Kirsten M Fiest; Alexandra D Frolkis; Nathalie Jette; Tamara Pringsheim; Christine St Germaine-Smith; Thilinie Rajapakse; Gilaad G Kaplan; Amy Metcalfe Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-11-12 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Natasha Nassar; Emanuele Leoncini; Emmanuelle Amar; Jazmín Arteaga-Vázquez; Marian K Bakker; Carol Bower; Mark A Canfield; Eduardo E Castilla; Guido Cocchi; Adolfo Correa; Melinda Csáky-Szunyogh; Marcia L Feldkamp; Babak Khoshnood; Danielle Landau; Nathalie Lelong; Jorge S López-Camelo; R Brian Lowry; Robert McDonnell; Paul Merlob; Julia Métneki; Margery Morgan; Osvaldo M Mutchinick; Miland N Palmer; Anke Rissmann; Csaba Siffel; Antonin Sìpek; Elena Szabova; David Tucker; Pierpaolo Mastroiacovo Journal: Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol Date: 2012-09-03