Literature DB >> 22298875

Common sonographic findings in the painful hip after hip arthroplasty.

Suzanne S Long1, David Surrey, Levon N Nazarian.   

Abstract

Diagnosing the cause of hip pain in patients with hip arthroplasty can be challenging because of the numerous possible causes of pain and artifacts caused by the prosthetic components on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging. Sonography plays an important role in the diagnosis and management of these patients because the soft tissues surrounding the prosthetic joint are not obscured by artifacts and because sonography enables hands-on examination of the painful site, dynamic evaluation of moving structures, and comparison with the opposite side. Another advantage of sonography is the ability to perform sonographically guided diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. In this pictorial essay, we highlight commonly encountered sonographic findings in patients with hip pain after hip arthroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22298875     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.301

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  8 in total

1.  Total hip prosthesis CT with single-energy projection-based metallic artifact reduction: impact on the visualization of specific periprosthetic soft tissue structures.

Authors:  Pedro Augusto Gondim Teixeira; Jean-Baptiste Meyer; Cedric Baumann; Ariane Raymond; François Sirveaux; Henry Coudane; Alain Blum
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-06-10       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Fluoroscopy- vs ultrasound-guided aspiration techniques in the management of periprosthetic joint infection: which is the best?

Authors:  Filippo Randelli; Marco Brioschi; Pietro Randelli; Federico Ambrogi; Silvana Sdao; Alberto Aliprandi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 3.  Ultrasound evaluations and guided procedures of the painful joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Steven B Soliman; Jason J Davis; Stephanie J Muh; Saifuddin T Vohra; Ashish Patel; Marnix T van Holsbeeck
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2022-05-28       Impact factor: 2.128

4.  The role of ultrasonography in the assessment of peri-prosthetic hip complications.

Authors:  Silvana Sdao; Davide Orlandi; Alberto Aliprandi; Francesca Lacelli; Luca Maria Sconfienza; Filippo Randelli; Francesco Sardanelli; Giovanni Serafini
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2014-06-27

5.  No association between pseudotumors, high serum metal-ion levels and metal hypersensitivity in large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty at 5-7-year follow-up.

Authors:  Mette Holm Hjorth; Maiken Stilling; Kjeld Soballe; Lars Hans Bolvig; Jacob Pontoppidan Thyssen; Inger Mechlenburg; Stig Storgaard Jakobsen
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Size of cup affects the anterior capsular distance in total hip arthroplasty, as measured with ultrasound.

Authors:  Sarunas Tarasevicius; Valdemaras Loiba; Justinas Stucinskas; Otto Robertsson; Hans Wingstrand
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Results after arthroscopic treatment of iliopsoas impingement after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  A Zimmerer; M Hauschild; R Nietschke; M M Schneider; G Wassilew; C Sobau; W Miehlke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-12       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  A comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of MARS MRI and ultrasound of the painful metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Imran A Siddiqui; Shiraz A Sabah; Keshthra Satchithananda; Adrian K Lim; Suzie Cro; Johann Henckel; John A Skinner; Alister J Hart
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-04-03       Impact factor: 3.717

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.