Literature DB >> 22297588

Putting the efficacy of psychiatric and general medicine medication into perspective: review of meta-analyses.

Stefan Leucht1, Sandra Hierl, Werner Kissling, Markus Dold, John M Davis.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of psychopharmacological treatments has been called into question. Psychiatrists are unfamiliar with the effectiveness of common medical drugs. AIMS: To put the efficacy of psychiatric drugs into the perspective of that of major medical drugs.
METHOD: We searched Medline and the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews on the efficacy of drugs compared with placebo for common medical and psychiatric disorders, and systematically presented the effect sizes for primary efficacy outcomes.
RESULTS: We included 94 meta-analyses (48 drugs in 20 medical diseases, 16 drugs in 8 psychiatric disorders). There were some general medical drugs with clearly higher effect sizes than the psychotropic agents, but the psychiatric drugs were not generally less efficacious than other drugs.
CONCLUSIONS: Any comparison of different outcomes in different diseases can only serve the purpose of a qualitative perspective. The increment of improvement by drug over placebo must be viewed in the context of the disease's seriousness, suffering induced, natural course, duration, outcomes, adverse events and societal values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22297588     DOI: 10.1192/bjp.bp.111.096594

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Psychiatry        ISSN: 0007-1250            Impact factor:   9.319


  99 in total

1.  The field of schizophrenia: strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats.

Authors:  John M Kane; Barbara Cornblatt; Christoph U Correll; Terry Goldberg; Todd Lencz; Anil K Malhotra; Delbert Robinson; Philip Szeszko
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2011-11-18       Impact factor: 9.306

2.  Factors contributing to the increasing placebo response in antidepressant trials.

Authors:  Siegfried Kasper; Markus Dold
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

3.  Antidepressant-placebo differences: is the glass half full or half empty?

Authors:  Dan J Stein
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 49.548

4.  Neuropsychopharmacology: Reflections on 40 Volumes.

Authors:  Alan Frazer
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 7.853

5.  EPA guidance on improving the image of psychiatry.

Authors:  A M Möller-Leimkühler; H-J Möller; W Maier; W Gaebel; P Falkai
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 5.270

6.  The future of psychotherapy research: stop the waste and focus on issues that matter.

Authors:  P Cuijpers
Journal:  Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci       Date:  2015-09-09       Impact factor: 6.892

Review 7.  Maximizing response to first-line antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review focused on finding from meta-analysis.

Authors:  Robert C Smith; Stefan Leucht; John M Davis
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  Mood matters: a national survey on attitudes to depression.

Authors:  John R Kelly; Mary Cosgrove; Cian Judd; Kathy Scott; Aoibheann Mc Loughlin; Veronica O'Keane
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 1.568

9.  The past, present and future of psychiatric diagnosis.

Authors:  Allen Frances
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 49.548

10.  Adherence to psychiatric treatments and the public image of psychiatry.

Authors:  Mario Maj
Journal:  World Psychiatry       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 49.548

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.