| Literature DB >> 22295025 |
Dan-Qing Yu1, Shu-Guang Lin, Ji-Yan Chen, Ling Xue, Guang Li, Hao-Jian Dong, Ying-Ling Zhou.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: It is still controversial whether borderline lesions with a vulnerable plaque should be stented early or simply treated pharmacologically. No data exist concerning the potential effects of statin therapy on borderline vulnerable lesions in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Entities:
Keywords: acute coronary syndrome; atorvastatin; intravascular ultrasound; vulnerable plaque
Year: 2011 PMID: 22295025 PMCID: PMC3258749 DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2011.23408
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Arch Med Sci ISSN: 1734-1922 Impact factor: 3.318
Lipid profile at baseline and at follow-up
| TC [mmol/l] | LDL-C [mmol/l] | HDL-C [mmol/l] | TG [mmol/l] | ApoA1 [g/l] | ApoB [g/l] | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.10 ±0.89 | 1.83 ±0.59 | 1.12 ±0.25 | 1.83 ±1.50 | 1.21 ±0.26 | 0.68 ±0.13 | |
| 3.85 ±0.96 | 1.91 ±0.61 | 1.12 ±0.19 | 1.55 ±1.27 | 1.10 ±0.16 | 0.59 ±0.14 | |
| NS | NS | NS | NS | NS | < 0.05 |
TC – total cholesterol, LDL-C – low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, HDL-C – high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, TG – triglyceride, ApoA1 – apolipoprotein A-I, ApoB – apolipoprotein B
Intravascular ultrasound imaging at baseline and follow-up
| EEM CSA [mm2] | Minimal lumen CSA [mm2] | P&M area [mm2] | Plaque Burden [%] | Soft plaque | Fibrous plaque | Coronary thrombus | Plaque rupture | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13.79 ±3.19 | 5.63 ±2.51 | 8.17 ±2.55 | 61.41 ±10.34 | 43 (86.0%) | 5 (10.0%) | 7 (20%) | 5 (14%) | |
| 14.07 ±2.10 | 6.32 ±2.42 | 7.70 ±2.19 | 56.94 ±8.47 | 18 (36.0%) 30 | (60.0%) 0 | (0%) 0 | (0%) | |
| NS | < 0.01 | < 0.05 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
CSA – cross-sectional area, EEM – external elastic membrane, P&M area – plaque and media cross-sectional area
Figure 1A – plaque area change. B – minimal lumen cross-scetional area change. C – plaque burden change at baseline and follow-up
Figure 2Representative 3-dimensional intravascular ultrasound analysis at both baseline and follow-up. A – IVUS imaging at baseline. B – IVUS imaging at follow-up
Levels of MMP-9, TIMP-1, and hsCRP at baseline and follow-up
| MMP-9 [ng/ml] | TIMP-1 [ng/ml] | hsCRP [mg/l] | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2192 ±881 | 657 ±247 | 3.48±1.50 | |
| 1773 ±1085 | 709 ±227 0.39 | 0.39 ±0.19 | |
| < 0.01 | < 0.01 | < 0.01 |
MMP-9 – matrix metalloproteinase-9, TIMP-1 – tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1, hsCRP – high-sensitive C-reactive protein
Figure 3A – relationship between plaque changes and changes in the levels of plasma MMP-9. B – relationship between plaque changes and changes in the levels of plasma hs-CRP