Literature DB >> 22294719

Driving up the quality and relevance of research through the use of agreed core outcomes.

Paula Williamson, Douglas Altman, Jane Blazeby, Michael Clarke, Elizabeth Gargon.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2012        PMID： 22294719     DOI： 10.1258/jhsrp.2011.011131

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy        ISSN： 1355-8196


× No keyword cloud information.
  98 in total

1.  Reporting data on long-term follow-up of critical care trials.

Authors:  May Hua; Hannah Wunsch
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 9.139

Review 2.  Evidence or eminence in abdominal surgery: recent improvements in perioperative care.

Authors:  Josefin Segelman; Jonas Nygren
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Core domain and outcome measurement sets for shoulder pain trials are needed: systematic review of physical therapy trials.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Sally E Green; Dorcas E Beaton; Nitin B Jain; Mario Lenza; Arianne P Verhagen; Stephen Surace; Jessica Deitch; Rachelle Buchbinder
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Design characteristic of randomised controlled trials for geographic atrophy in age-related macular degeneration: selection of outcomes and sample size calculation.

Authors:  A K Krezel; R E Hogg; S Krezel; R Fallis; A Azuara-Blanco
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 5.  Reporting Outcomes and Outcome Measures in Digital Replantation: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Syena Moltaji; Matteo Gallo; Chloe Wong; Jessica Murphy; Lucas Gallo; Daniel Waltho; Andrea Copeland; Marta Karpinski; Sadek Mowakket; Eric Duku; Achilleas Thoma
Journal:  J Hand Microsurg       Date:  2020-04-09

6.  Coloring by Number? Core Outcome Measures and the Canvas of Intensive Care Unit Survivorship.

Authors:  Bronwen Connolly; Catherine L Hough
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 21.405

Review 7.  Measuring outcomes in adult spinal deformity surgery: a systematic review to identify current strengths, weaknesses and gaps in patient-reported outcome measures.

Authors:  Sayf S A Faraj; Miranda L van Hooff; Roderick M Holewijn; David W Polly; Tsjitske M Haanstra; Marinus de Kleuver
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Advances in multidisciplinary therapy for meningiomas.

Authors:  Priscilla K Brastianos; Evanthia Galanis; Nicholas Butowski; Jason W Chan; Ian F Dunn; Roland Goldbrunner; Christel Herold-Mende; Franziska M Ippen; Christian Mawrin; Michael W McDermott; Andrew Sloan; James Snyder; Ghazaleh Tabatabai; Marcos Tatagiba; Joerg C Tonn; Patrick Y Wen; Kenneth Aldape; Farshad Nassiri; Gelareh Zadeh; Michael D Jenkinson; David R Raleigh
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2019-01-14       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Statistical approaches to harmonize data on cognitive measures in systematic reviews are rarely reported.

Authors:  Lauren E Griffith; Edwin van den Heuvel; Isabel Fortier; Nazmul Sohel; Scott M Hofer; Hélène Payette; Christina Wolfson; Sylvie Belleville; Meghan Kenny; Dany Doiron; Parminder Raina
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 10.  Need for Digital Biomarkers in Musculoskeletal Trials.

Authors:  Jörg Goldhahn
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2017-08-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.