Literature DB >> 22294060

Adverse drug reactions: analysis of spontaneous reporting system in Europe in 2007-2009.

Jindrich Srba1, Veronika Descikova, Jiri Vlcek.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Spontaneous reporting systems in European countries are crucial for collecting adverse drug reaction (ADR) reports. The aim of this study was to evaluate reporting activity among countries and their strategy to increase the number of reports. We also established the best measure for assessment quantity of reports.
METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study based on questionnaires and annual reports. The most reliable measure of reporting was determined by Spearman correlation coefficients.
RESULTS: Data collected in spontaneous reporting systems in 26 European countries were analysed. In 2007, 2008 and 2009, the average value of reports per year per million inhabitants based on the safety databases of countries was 208, 236, 286, respectively; in comparison, that of Eudra- Vigilance was 311, 453 and 435, respectively. Twelve countries reached a significant level for signal detection of ADRs in 2009. The population-based reporting ratio (PBRR) was correlated to the total expenditure on health (ρ=0.499, p=0.023, n=21), public expenditure on health (ρ=0.477, p=0.035, n=20), density of physicians (ρ=0.336, p=0.136, n=21) and expenditure on pharmaceuticals (ρ=0.365, p=0.114, n=20). Strategies of regulatory authorities to increase reporting were determined.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study make several noteworthy contributions regarding national spontaneous reporting systems. The relevance of the PBRR for the measurement reporting activity is clearly supported by the current findings. This study also shows that there is a general trend towards increased reporting activity. This is maintained by regional centres and encouragement of reporting. A further study would be helpful to assess the effectiveness of reporting systems at both the national and European level.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22294060     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-012-1219-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  17 in total

1.  Spontaneous reporting--of what? Clinical concerns about drugs.

Authors:  I R Edwards
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Pharmacovigilance in perspective.

Authors:  R H Meyboom; A C Egberts; F W Gribnau; Y A Hekster
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 5.606

3.  A retrospective evaluation of a data mining approach to aid finding new adverse drug reaction signals in the WHO international database.

Authors:  M Lindquist; M Ståhl; A Bate; I R Edwards; R H Meyboom
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Good pharmacovigilance practices: technology enabled.

Authors:  Robert C Nelson; Bruce Palsulich; Victor Gogolak
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Use of triage strategies in the WHO signal-detection process.

Authors:  Marie Lindquist
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 6.  Determinants of under-reporting of adverse drug reactions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elena Lopez-Gonzalez; Maria T Herdeiro; Adolfo Figueiras
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Patient experiences of serious adverse drug reactions and their attitudes to medicines: a qualitative study of survivors of Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis in the UK.

Authors:  Tehreem F Butt; Anthony R Cox; Helen Lewis; Robin E Ferner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2011-04-01       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 8.  Pharmacovigilance: methods, recent developments and future perspectives.

Authors:  L Härmark; A C van Grootheest
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2008-06-04       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 9.  Under-reporting of adverse drug reactions : a systematic review.

Authors:  Lorna Hazell; Saad A W Shakir
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 5.228

Review 10.  Data quality management in pharmacovigilance.

Authors:  Marie Lindquist
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 5.228

View more
  2 in total

1.  Global COVID-19 pandemic and reporting behavior - An analysis of the Food and Drug Administration adverse events reporting system.

Authors:  Michael Dörks; Kathrin Jobski; Falk Hoffmann; Antonios Douros
Journal:  Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 2.732

2.  Torsadogenic risk of antipsychotics: combining adverse event reports with drug utilization data across Europe.

Authors:  Emanuel Raschi; Elisabetta Poluzzi; Brian Godman; Ariola Koci; Ugo Moretti; Marija Kalaba; Marion Bennie; Corrado Barbui; Bjorn Wettermark; Miriam Sturkenboom; Fabrizio De Ponti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-20       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.