Literature DB >> 22293102

Differences in treatment approach between Dutch paediatric dentists and general practitioners, a case control study.

D Kuin1, J S J Veerkamp.   

Abstract

AIM: This case control study was to assess whether paediatric dentists perform significantly more diagnostic, preventive and curative care in a clinical setting then do general dental practitioners.
METHODS: 16 paediatric dentists were approached and a matching control group of 16 general dental practitioners drawn from an insurance random list were selected based on matching age, practice composition and year of graduation. They were asked by mail to participate. Positive respondents were visited. All children seen during the visit were included in this study. During intra-oral inspection DMFS/dmfs was clinically scored, as were the availability of bitewings, gender, presence of fissure sealants, visibility of plaque and gingivitis and presence of fistulas. STATISTICS: Statistical analysis was carried out by using SPSS 15, p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Paediatric dentists treat a greater number of younger children (p<0.05), placed more restorations and sealants (p<0.01), take more bitewing radiographs (p<0.01) and give a similar level of care to all children irrespective of their age compared to children seen by general dental practitioners.
CONCLUSIONS: Paediatric dentists perform significantly more diagnostic, preventive and curative care in the clinical situation for 0-6 year old children than do general dental practitioners.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22293102     DOI: 10.1007/bf03262837

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent        ISSN: 1818-6300


  9 in total

1.  An investigation into the use of bitewing radiography in children in Greater Glasgow.

Authors:  G K Taylor; L M D Macpherson
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2004-05-08       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  [Trends in oral healthcare. Caries prevalence and frequency of visits to the dentist for checkups].

Authors:  A A Schuller; J H G Poorterman
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd       Date:  2006-08

3.  The influence of practice type, region, and age on treatment recommendations for primary teeth.

Authors:  C M Hanes; D R Myers; J C Dushku
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1992 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

4.  [Treatability of children according to Dutch dentists].

Authors:  M A Jensma; J S J Veerkamp
Journal:  Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd       Date:  2008-08

5.  Radiographic recommendations for the primary dentition: comparison of general dentists and pediatric dentists.

Authors:  C McKnight-Hanes; D R Myers; J C Dushku; W O Thompson; L C Durham
Journal:  Pediatr Dent       Date:  1990 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.874

6.  A comparison of paediatric dentists' and general dental practitioners' care patterns in paediatric dental care.

Authors:  M A Schorer-Jensma; J S J Veerkamp
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04

Review 7.  EAPD guidelines for use of radiographs in children.

Authors:  I Espelid; I Mejàre; K Weerheijm
Journal:  Eur J Paediatr Dent       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.231

8.  The etiology of childhood dental fear: the role of dental and conditioning experiences.

Authors:  M Ten Berge; J S J Veerkamp; J Hoogstraten
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  2002

9.  Detection of approximal caries by clinical and radiographic examination in 9-year-old Swedish children.

Authors:  M Lillehagen; M Grindefjord; I Mejàre
Journal:  Caries Res       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 4.056

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Approaches used to care for carious primary molars among pediatric dentists and general dental practitioners in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Shatha Aldhilan; Sanaa Al-Haj Ali
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2018-03-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.