Literature DB >> 2150224

Radiographic recommendations for the primary dentition: comparison of general dentists and pediatric dentists.

C McKnight-Hanes1, D R Myers, J C Dushku, W O Thompson, L C Durham.   

Abstract

A survey which included brief case histories and intraoral photos of four primary dentitions ranging from healthy to severely carious was mailed to a random sample of 2000 general dentists and 1000 pediatric dentists. Radiographic options were listed, from which the dentist was to indicate all films needed for each child's examination. Surveys were received from 1273 (43%) dentists, including 713 (36%) general dentists and 560 (56%) pediatric dentists. The pediatric dentists recommended significantly more diagnostic radiographs than did the general dentists across all four primary dentition cases. This trend was apparent in the absence of clinically visible caries. When radiographs were recommended, bite-wing radiographs were the most frequently ordered films. The most frequently ordered combination among all respondents was bite-wing radiographs plus anterior periapical films. The results suggest that, frequently, neither general dentists nor pediatric dentists prescribe radiographs for the primary dentition patient that conform to the USDHHS guidelines for radiographic examination (1987).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2150224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 0164-1263            Impact factor:   1.874


  3 in total

1.  Differences in treatment approach between Dutch paediatric dentists and general practitioners, a case control study.

Authors:  D Kuin; J S J Veerkamp
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2012-02

2.  A comparison of paediatric dentists' and general dental practitioners' care patterns in paediatric dental care.

Authors:  M A Schorer-Jensma; J S J Veerkamp
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2010-04

3.  The management of dental caries in primary teeth - involving service providers and users in the design of a trial.

Authors:  Zoe Marshman; Nicola Innes; Chris Deery; Melanie Hall; Chris Speed; Gail Douglas; Jan Clarkson; Helen Rodd
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 2.279

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.