Literature DB >> 22293041

Comparison of treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Kanyarat Katanyoo1, Sompol Sanguanrungsirikul, Sumonmal Manusirivithaya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the treatment outcomes between squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and adenocarcinoma (ACA) in locally advanced cervical cancer patients.
METHODS: All medical records of stages IIB-IVA of cervical cancer patients who had completed treatment between 1995 and 2008 were reviewed. ACA 1 case was matched for SCC 2 cases with clinical stage, tumor size, treatment modalities (radiation therapy (RT) vs concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT)). Treatment outcomes including response to RT/CCRT, time to complete response (CR), patterns of treatment failure and survival outcomes were analyzed.
RESULTS: A total of 423 patients with stages IIB-IVA (141 ACA: 282 SCC) were included. Most of the patients (about 60%) had stage IIB. The overall complete responses (CR) between ACA and SCC were 86.5% and 94.7%, respectively (p=0.004). Median time to clinical CR from RT/CCRT of ACA were 2 months (0-5 months) compared with 1 month (0-4 months) for SCC (p=0.001). Pelvic recurrence and distant failure were found in 2.1% and 14.9% in ACA, and corresponding with 3.9% and 15.6% in SCC. The 5-year overall survival rates of ACA compared to SCC were 59.9% and 61.7% (p=0.191), respectively. When all prognostic factors are adjusted, clinical staging was the only factor that influenced overall survival.
CONCLUSION: ACA in locally advanced cervical cancer had poorer response rate from treatment and also used longer time to achieve CR than SCC. However, these effects were not determinants of survival outcomes.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22293041     DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2012.01.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Oncol        ISSN: 0090-8258            Impact factor:   5.482


  45 in total

1.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery as an alternative treatment to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for young premenopausal patients with FIGO stage IIB squamous cervical carcinoma.

Authors:  ShanShan Yang; Ying Gao; Jing Sun; Bairong Xia; TianBo Liu; HongXia Zhang; Qi Li; Min Xiao; YunYan Zhang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2015-01-21

2.  Combination of external beam radiotherapy and Californium (Cf)-252 neutron intracavity brachytherapy is more effective in control of cervical squamous cell carcinoma than that of cervical adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Yanli Xiong; Jia Liu; Shu Chen; Qian Zhou; Wenjing Xu; Chen Tang; Yonghong Chen; Mei Yang; Xin Lei
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2015-08-14       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Locally advanced adenocarcinoma and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix in gynecologic oncology group trials of cisplatin-based chemoradiation.

Authors:  Peter G Rose; James J Java; Charles W Whitney; Frederick B Stehman; Rachelle Lanciano; Gillian M Thomas
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-08-23       Impact factor: 5.482

4.  A comparison of the prognosis between adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in stage IB-IIA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Xiuzhen Xie; Kun Song; Baoxia Cui; Jie Jiang; Xingsheng Yang; Beihua Kong
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis.

Authors:  Juan Zhou; San-Gang Wu; Jia-Yuan Sun; Feng-Yan Li; Huan-Xin Lin; Qiong-Hua Chen; Zhen-Yu He
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-09-19       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 6.  Management of Stage IIB Cervical Cancer: an Overview of the Current Evidence.

Authors:  Shinya Matsuzaki; Maximilian Klar; Mikio Mikami; Muneaki Shimada; Brendan H Grubbs; Keiichi Fujiwara; Lynda D Roman; Koji Matsuo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-02-12       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 7.  Adenocarcinoma of the cervix: should we treat it differently?

Authors:  Ned L Williams; Theresa L Werner; Elke A Jarboe; David K Gaffney
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  Quality of life among survivors of early-stage cervical cancer in Taiwan: an exploration of treatment modality differences.

Authors:  Chia-Chun Li; Ting-Chang Chang; Yun-Fang Tsai; Lynn Chen
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Adenocarcinoma Treated With Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy Using Paclitaxel and Cisplatin.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Arakaki; Takuro Ariga; Joichi Heianna; Yuko Shimoji; Tadaharu Nakasone; Yusuke Taira; Tomoko Nakamoto; Takuma Ooyama; Wataru Kudaka; Itomi Kaneshima; Kumiko Nishihira; Keiko Mekaru; Yoichi Aoki
Journal:  In Vivo       Date:  2020 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.155

10.  Phase 2 trial of paclitaxel, 13-cis retinoic acid, and interferon alfa-2b in the treatment of advanced stage or recurrent cervical cancer.

Authors:  Mihae Song; Robert S DiPaola; Bernadette M Cracchiolo; Darlene G Gibbon; Mira Hellmann; Wilberto Nieves-Neira; Ami Vaidya; Allison R Wagreich; Weichung J Shih; Lorna Rodriguez-Rodriguez
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 3.437

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.