Peter G Rose1, James J Java2, Charles W Whitney3, Frederick B Stehman4, Rachelle Lanciano5, Gillian M Thomas6. 1. Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation and Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States. Electronic address: rosep@ccf.org. 2. Gynecologic Oncology Group Statistical & Data Center, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Buffalo, NY 14263, United States. 3. Christiana Gynecologic Oncology, LLC, Apex Medical Center, Newark DE 19713, United States. 4. Gynecologic Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Mel and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202, United States. 5. Radiation Oncology, Delaware County Regional Cancer Center, Drexel Hill, PA 19026, United States. 6. Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3 M5 Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Conflicting results have been reported for adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix with respect to their response to therapy and prognosis. The current study sought to evaluate impact of adeno- and adenosquamous histology in the randomized trials of primary cisplatin-based chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS: Patients with adeno- and adenosquamous cervical carcinomas were retrospectively studied and compared to squamous cell carcinomas in GOG trials of chemoradiation. RESULTS: Among 1671 enrolled in clinical trials of chemoradiation, 182 adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas were identified (10.9%). A higher percentage of adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas were stage IB2 (27.5% versus 20.0%) and fewer had stage IIIB (21.4% versus 28.6%). The mean tumor size was larger for squamous than adeno- and adenosquamous. Adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas were more often poorly differentiated (46.2% versus 26.8%). When treated with radiation therapy alone, the 70 patients with adeno- and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix showed a statistically poorer overall survival (p=0.0499) compared to the 647 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. However, when treated with radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the 112 patients with adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas had a similar overall survival (p=0.459) compared the 842 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Adverse effects to treatment were similar across histologies. CONCLUSION: Adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix are associated with worse overall survival when treated with radiation alone but with similar progression-free and overall survival compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix when treated with cisplatin based chemoradiation.
OBJECTIVE: Conflicting results have been reported for adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix with respect to their response to therapy and prognosis. The current study sought to evaluate impact of adeno- and adenosquamous histology in the randomized trials of primary cisplatin-based chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer. METHODS:Patients with adeno- and adenosquamous cervical carcinomas were retrospectively studied and compared to squamous cell carcinomas in GOG trials of chemoradiation. RESULTS: Among 1671 enrolled in clinical trials of chemoradiation, 182 adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas were identified (10.9%). A higher percentage of adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas were stage IB2 (27.5% versus 20.0%) and fewer had stage IIIB (21.4% versus 28.6%). The mean tumor size was larger for squamous than adeno- and adenosquamous. Adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas were more often poorly differentiated (46.2% versus 26.8%). When treated with radiation therapy alone, the 70 patients with adeno- and adenosquamous carcinoma of the cervix showed a statistically poorer overall survival (p=0.0499) compared to the 647 patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix. However, when treated with radiation therapy with concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, the 112 patients with adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas had a similar overall survival (p=0.459) compared the 842 patients with squamous cell carcinoma. Adverse effects to treatment were similar across histologies. CONCLUSION: Adeno- and adenosquamous carcinomas of the cervix are associated with worse overall survival when treated with radiation alone but with similar progression-free and overall survival compared to squamous cell carcinomas of the cervix when treated with cisplatin based chemoradiation.
Authors: Vijaya Galic; Thomas J Herzog; Sharyn N Lewin; Alfred I Neugut; William M Burke; Yu-Shiang Lu; Dawn L Hershman; Jason D Wright Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2012-01-18 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Alfonso Dueñas-González; Juan J Zarbá; Firuza Patel; Juan C Alcedo; Semir Beslija; Luis Casanova; Pittayapoom Pattaranutaporn; Shahid Hameed; Julie M Blair; Helen Barraclough; Mauro Orlando Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-03-28 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: P G Rose; B N Bundy; E B Watkins; J T Thigpen; G Deppe; M A Maiman; D L Clarke-Pearson; S Insalaco Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: C W Whitney; W Sause; B N Bundy; J H Malfetano; E V Hannigan; W C Fowler; D L Clarke-Pearson; S Y Liao Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rachelle Lanciano; Alison Calkins; Brian N Bundy; Groesbeck Parham; Joseph A Lucci; David H Moore; Bradley J Monk; Dennis M O'Connor Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-10-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: H M Keys; B N Bundy; F B Stehman; L I Muderspach; W E Chafe; C L Suggs; J L Walker; D Gersell Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1999-04-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Gillian Thomas; Shamshad Ali; Frank J P Hoebers; Kathleen M Darcy; William H Rodgers; Malti Patel; Ovardia Abulafia; Joseph A Lucci; Adrian C Begg Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2007-11-26 Impact factor: 5.482
Authors: Kimberly Levinson; Anna L Beavis; Christopher Purdy; Anne F Rositch; Akila Viswanathan; Aaron H Wolfson; Michael G Kelly; Krishnansu S Tewari; Leah McNally; Saketh R Guntupalli; Omar Ragab; Yi-Chun Lee; David S Miller; Warner K Huh; Kelly J Wilkinson; Nicola M Spirtos; Linda Van Le; Yovanni Casablanca; Laura L Holman; Steven E Waggoner; Amanda N Fader Journal: Gynecol Oncol Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 5.304