Literature DB >> 22293017

A non-auditory measure of interference predicts distraction by competing speech in older adults.

Esther Janse1.   

Abstract

In this study, older adults monitored for pre-assigned target sounds in a target talker's speech in a quiet (no noise) condition and in a condition with competing-talker noise. The question was to which extent the impact of the competing-talker noise on performance could be predicted from individual hearing loss and from a cognitive measure of inhibitory abilities, i.e., a measure of Stroop interference. The results showed that the non-auditory measure of Stroop interference predicted the impact of distraction on performance, over and above the effect of hearing loss. This suggests that individual differences in inhibitory abilities among older adults relate to susceptibility to distracting speech.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22293017     DOI: 10.1080/13825585.2011.652590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn        ISSN: 1382-5585


  29 in total

1.  Listening and Learning: Cognitive Contributions to the Rehabilitation of Older Adults With and Without Audiometrically Defined Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Kelly L Tremblay; Kristina C Backer
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

Review 2.  Is Listening in Noise Worth It? The Neurobiology of Speech Recognition in Challenging Listening Conditions.

Authors:  Mark A Eckert; Susan Teubner-Rhodes; Kenneth I Vaden
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Evidence for enhanced neural tracking of the speech envelope underlying age-related speech-in-noise difficulties.

Authors:  Lien Decruy; Jonas Vanthornhout; Tom Francart
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-05-29       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  The effect of plausibility on sentence comprehension among older adults and its relation to cognitive functions.

Authors:  Jungmee Yoon; Luca Campanelli; Mira Goral; Klara Marton; Naomi Eichorn; Loraine K Obler
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.645

5.  Talker identification: Effects of masking, hearing loss, and age.

Authors:  Virginia Best; Jayne B Ahlstrom; Christine R Mason; Elin Roverud; Tyler K Perrachione; Gerald Kidd; Judy R Dubno
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Acoustic Hearing Can Interfere With Single-Sided Deafness Cochlear-Implant Speech Perception.

Authors:  Joshua G W Bernstein; Olga A Stakhovskaya; Kenneth Kragh Jensen; Matthew J Goupell
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Cognitive and neural predictors of speech comprehension in noisy backgrounds in older adults.

Authors:  Megan C Fitzhugh; Sydney Y Schaefer; Leslie C Baxter; Corianne Rogalsky
Journal:  Lang Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-10-04       Impact factor: 2.331

8.  Semantic context and stimulus variability independently affect rapid adaptation to non-native English speech in young adults.

Authors:  Rebecca E Bieber; Sandra Gordon-Salant
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Aging and working memory modulate the ability to benefit from visible speech and iconic gestures during speech-in-noise comprehension.

Authors:  Louise Schubotz; Judith Holler; Linda Drijvers; Aslı Özyürek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2020-07-05

10.  One Size Does Not Fit All: Examining the Effects of Working Memory Capacity on Spoken Word Recognition in Older Adults Using Eye Tracking.

Authors:  Gal Nitsan; Karen Banai; Boaz M Ben-David
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2022-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.