Literature DB >> 22292459

Statistical literacy in obstetricians and gynecologists.

Britta L Anderson, Gerd Gigerenzer, Scott Parker, Jay Schulkin.   

Abstract

The Obstetrician-Gynecologist Statistical Literacy Questionnaire (OGSLQ) was designed to examine physicians' understanding of various number tasks that are relevant to obstetrician-gynecologists (ob-gyns) practice. Forty-seven percent of the nationally representative, practicing ob-gyns responded. Physicians did poorly on the questions about numerical facts (e.g., number of women living with HIV/AIDS), better on questions about statistical concepts (e.g., incidence, prevalence), and best on questions about numerical relationships (e.g., convert frequency to percentage) with 0%, 7%, 36%, answering all correctly, respectively. Only 19% correctly estimated the number of U.S. women with cancer. Sixty-six percent were able to use sensitivity and specificity to choose a test option. Around 90% could translate between frequency and probability formats. Forty-nine percent of respondents were able to calculate the positive predictive value of a mammography screening test. Physicians lack some understanding of statistical literacy. It is important that we monitor physicians' statistical literacy and provide training to students and physicians.
© 2012 National Association for Healthcare Quality.

Entities:  

Keywords:  academic; evidence-based practice/guidelines; practice setting/focus; research; research-evaluation; topics

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22292459     DOI: 10.1111/j.1945-1474.2011.00194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Healthc Qual        ISSN: 1062-2551            Impact factor:   1.095


  9 in total

1.  Invasive Prenatal Diagnostic Testing Recommendations are Influenced by Maternal Age, Statistical Misconception and Perceived Liability.

Authors:  Talya Miron-Shatz; Sivan R Rapaport; Naama Srebnik; Yaniv Hanoch; Jonina Rabinowitz; Glen M Doniger; Linda Levi; Jonathan J Rolison; Avi Tsafrir
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Statistical literacy and scientific reasoning & argumentation in physicians.

Authors:  Felicitas M Schmidt; Jan M Zottmann; Maximilian Sailer; Martin R Fischer; Markus Berndt
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2021-04-15

3.  Measuring Practicing Clinicians' Information Literacy. An Exploratory Analysis in the Context of Panel Management.

Authors:  Brian E Dixon; Katherine Barboza; Ashley E Jensen; Katelyn J Bennett; Scott E Sherman; Mark D Schwartz
Journal:  Appl Clin Inform       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.342

4.  Does exposure to simulated patient cases improve accuracy of clinicians' predictive value estimates of diagnostic test results? A within-subjects experiment at St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Canada.

Authors:  Bonnie Armstrong; Julia Spaniol; Nav Persaud
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  How are risk ratios reported in orthopaedic surgery journals? A descriptive study of formats used to report absolute risks.

Authors:  Dafina Petrova; Alexander Joeris; María-José Sánchez; Elena Salamanca-Fernández; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-11-25       Impact factor: 2.692

6.  Assessing minimal medical statistical literacy using the Quick Risk Test: a prospective observational study in Germany.

Authors:  Mirjam Annina Jenny; Niklas Keller; Gerd Gigerenzer
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Cancer screening risk literacy of physicians in training: An experimental study.

Authors:  Dafina Petrova; Guiliana Mas; Gorka Navarrete; Tania Tello Rodriguez; Pedro J Ortiz; Rocio Garcia-Retamero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: A Tutorial on Odds Ratios, Relative Risk, Absolute Risk, and Number Needed to Treat.

Authors:  Thomas F Monaghan; Syed N Rahman; Christina W Agudelo; Alan J Wein; Jason M Lazar; Karel Everaert; Roger R Dmochowski
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 3.390

9.  A blended learning training programme for health information providers to enhance implementation of the Guideline Evidence-based Health Information: development and qualitative pilot study.

Authors:  Jana Hinneburg; Julia Lühnen; Anke Steckelberg; Birte Berger-Höger
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 2.463

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.