Literature DB >> 22292203

The biomechanical effect of changes in cancellous bone density on synthetic femur behaviour.

B Nicayenzi1, S Shah, E H Schemitsch, H Bougherara, R Zdero.   

Abstract

Biomechanical researchers increasingly use commercially available and experimentally validated synthetic femurs to mimic human femurs. However, the choice of cancellous bone density for these artificial femurs appears to be done arbitrarily. The aim of the work reported in this paper was to examine the effect of synthetic cancellous bone density on the mechanical behaviour of synthetic femurs. Thirty left, large, fourth-generation composite femurs were mounted onto an Instron material testing system. The femurs were divided evenly into five groups each containing six femurs, each group representing a different synthetic cancellous bone density: 0.08, 0.16, 0.24, 0.32, and 0.48 g/cm3. Femurs were tested non-destructively to obtain axial, lateral, and torsional stiffness, followed by destructive tests to measure axial failure load, displacement, and energy. Experimental results yielded the following ranges and the coefficient of determination for a linear regression (R2) with cancellous bone density: axial stiffness (range 2116.5-2530.6N/mm; R2 = 0.94), lateral stiffness (range 204.3-227.8N/mm; R2 = 0.08), torsional stiffness (range 259.9-281.5N/mm; R2 = 0.91), failure load (range 5527.6-11 109.3 N; R2 = 0.92), failure displacement (range 2.97-6.49 mm; R2 = 0.85), and failure energy (range 8.79-42.81 J; R2 = 0.91). These synthetic femurs showed no density effect on lateral stiffness and only a moderate influence on axial and torsional stiffness; however, there was a strong density effect on axial failure load, displacement, and energy. Because these synthetic femurs have previously been experimentally validated against human femurs, these trends may be generalized to the clinical situation. This is the first study in the literature to perform such an assessment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22292203     DOI: 10.1177/0954411911420004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Inst Mech Eng H        ISSN: 0954-4119            Impact factor:   1.617


  3 in total

1.  Inversion of the acetabular labrum causes increased localized contact pressure on the femoral head: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Xipeng Wang; Kiyokazu Fukui; Ayumi Kaneuji; Kenichi Hirosaki; Hiroyasu Miyakawa; Norio Kawahara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Periprosthetic fractures: concepts of biomechanical in vitro investigations.

Authors:  Eike Jakubowitz; Jörn Bengt Seeger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Biomechanical Analysis Using FEA and Experiments of Metal Plate and Bone Strut Repair of a Femur Midshaft Segmental Defect.

Authors:  Jason Coquim; Joseph Clemenzi; Mohsen Salahi; Abdurahman Sherif; Pouria Tavakkoli Avval; Suraj Shah; Emil H Schemitsch; Z Shaghayegh Bagheri; Habiba Bougherara; Radovan Zdero
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-18       Impact factor: 3.411

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.