AIMS: To assess the biopsychosocial factors associated with acute temporomandibular disorders (TMD) based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). METHODS: Participants were assessed in community-based dental clinics and evaluated by trained clinicians using physical and psychosocial measures. A total of 207 subjects were evaluated. Patients' high-risk versus low-risk status for potentially developing chronic TMD was also determined. Analyses of variance and chi square analyses were applied to these data. RESULTS: Participants' characteristic pain intensity differed among RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses. They also significantly varied in their self-reported graded chronic pain, depression, somatization (pain inclusive), somatization (pain excluded), and physical well-being. In addition, participants with differing RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses varied in self-reported pain during their chewing performance. Finally, there were also significant differences in chewing performance between high-risk versus low-risk (for developing chronic TMD) patients. CONCLUSION: Participants with multiple diagnoses reported higher pain, as well as other symptoms, relative to participants without a TMD diagnosis. For chewing performance, participants with mutual diagnoses reported more pain compared to other participants. Finally, the risk-status of patients significantly affected chewing performance.
AIMS: To assess the biopsychosocial factors associated with acute temporomandibular disorders (TMD) based on the Research Diagnostic Criteria for Temporomandibular Disorders (RDC/TMD). METHODS:Participants were assessed in community-based dental clinics and evaluated by trained clinicians using physical and psychosocial measures. A total of 207 subjects were evaluated. Patients' high-risk versus low-risk status for potentially developing chronic TMD was also determined. Analyses of variance and chi square analyses were applied to these data. RESULTS:Participants' characteristic pain intensity differed among RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses. They also significantly varied in their self-reported graded chronic pain, depression, somatization (pain inclusive), somatization (pain excluded), and physical well-being. In addition, participants with differing RDC/TMD Axis I diagnoses varied in self-reported pain during their chewing performance. Finally, there were also significant differences in chewing performance between high-risk versus low-risk (for developing chronic TMD) patients. CONCLUSION:Participants with multiple diagnoses reported higher pain, as well as other symptoms, relative to participants without a TMD diagnosis. For chewing performance, participants with mutual diagnoses reported more pain compared to other participants. Finally, the risk-status of patients significantly affected chewing performance.
Authors: Edmond Truelove; Wei Pan; John O Look; Lloyd A Mancl; Richard K Ohrbach; Ana M Velly; Kimberly H Huggins; Patricia Lenton; Eric L Shiffman Journal: J Orofac Pain Date: 2010
Authors: K Kino; M Sugisaki; T Haketa; Y Amemori; T Ishikawa; T Shibuya; F Sato; T Amagasa; T Shibuya; H Tanabe; T Yoda; I Sakamoto; K Omura; H Miyaoka Journal: J Oral Rehabil Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.837
Authors: Anna R Wright; Robert J Gatchel; Lynn Wildenstein; Richard Riggs; Peter Buschang; Edward Ellis Journal: J Am Dent Assoc Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 3.634
Authors: Marina Alexandra Gavín Clavero; María Victoria Simón Sanz; Úrsula María Jariod Ferrer; Andrea Mur Til; Julia Blasco Palacio; Eduard Mirada Donisa Journal: J Maxillofac Oral Surg Date: 2021-01-07