Felipe G Castro1, Lisa A Strycker2, Deborah J Toobert2, Manuel Barrera3. 1. Department of Psychology, University of Texas at El Paso. 2. Oregon Research Institute (Eugene, Oregon). 3. Department of Psychology, Arizona State University (Tempe, Arizona) and Oregon Research Institute (Eugene, Oregon).
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To reduce health disparities, behavioral health interventions must reach subcultural groups and demonstrate effectiveness in improving their health behaviors and outcomes. One approach to developing such health interventions is to culturally adapt original evidence-based interventions. The goals of the article are to (a) describe consensus on the stages involved in developing cultural adaptations, (b) identify common elements in cultural adaptations, (c) examine evidence on the effectiveness of culturally enhanced interventions for various health conditions, and (d) pose questions for future research. METHOD: Influential literature from the past decade was examined to identify points of consensus. RESULTS: There is agreement that cultural adaptation can be organized into 5 stages: information gathering, preliminary design, preliminary testing, refinement, and final trial. With few exceptions, reviews of several health conditions (e.g., AIDS, asthma, diabetes) concluded that culturally enhanced interventions are more effective in improving health outcomes than usual care or other control conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Progress has been made in establishing methods for conducting cultural adaptations and providing evidence of their effectiveness. Future research should include evaluations of cultural adaptations developed in stages, tests to determine the effectiveness of cultural adaptations relative to the original versions, and studies that advance our understanding of cultural constructs' contributions to intervention engagement and efficacy.
OBJECTIVE: To reduce health disparities, behavioral health interventions must reach subcultural groups and demonstrate effectiveness in improving their health behaviors and outcomes. One approach to developing such health interventions is to culturally adapt original evidence-based interventions. The goals of the article are to (a) describe consensus on the stages involved in developing cultural adaptations, (b) identify common elements in cultural adaptations, (c) examine evidence on the effectiveness of culturally enhanced interventions for various health conditions, and (d) pose questions for future research. METHOD: Influential literature from the past decade was examined to identify points of consensus. RESULTS: There is agreement that cultural adaptation can be organized into 5 stages: information gathering, preliminary design, preliminary testing, refinement, and final trial. With few exceptions, reviews of several health conditions (e.g., AIDS, asthma, diabetes) concluded that culturally enhanced interventions are more effective in improving health outcomes than usual care or other control conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Progress has been made in establishing methods for conducting cultural adaptations and providing evidence of their effectiveness. Future research should include evaluations of cultural adaptations developed in stages, tests to determine the effectiveness of cultural adaptations relative to the original versions, and studies that advance our understanding of cultural constructs' contributions to intervention engagement and efficacy.
Authors: Emily J Bailey; Christopher J Cates; Sue G Kruske; Peter S Morris; Ngiare Brown; Anne B Chang Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2009-04-15
Authors: Marya Gwadz; Charles M Cleland; Elizabeth Applegate; Mindy Belkin; Monica Gandhi; Nadim Salomon; Angela Banfield; Noelle Leonard; Marion Riedel; Hannah Wolfe; Isaiah Pickens; Kelly Bolger; DeShannon Bowens; David Perlman; Donna Mildvan Journal: AIDS Behav Date: 2015-10
Authors: Lisa Wexler; Michael Chandler; Joseph P Gone; Mary Cwik; Laurence J Kirmayer; Teresa LaFromboise; Teresa Brockie; Victoria O'Keefe; John Walkup; James Allen Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2015-03-19 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Nancy Rumbaugh Whitesell; Alicia C Mousseau; Ellen M Keane; Nancy L Asdigian; Nicole Tuitt; Bradley Morse; Tracy Zacher; Rhonda Dick; Christina M Mitchell; Carol E Kaufman Journal: Prev Sci Date: 2019-10
Authors: Frank J Penedo; Michael H Antoni; Patricia I Moreno; Lara Traeger; Dolores Perdomo; Jason Dahn; Gregory E Miller; Steve Cole; Julian Orjuela; Edgar Pizarro; Betina Yanez Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2018-07-09 Impact factor: 2.226