A R Kristal1, A L Shattuck, R E Patterson. 1. Cancer Prevention Research Program, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024, USA. akristal@fhcrc.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This report examines how sources of fat and patterns of fat-related dietary habits differed between black, Hispanic and white women participating in a randomized trial of a low-fat diet intervention. DESIGN: The intervention consisted of group sessions, which met weekly for 6 weeks, biweekly for 6 weeks and monthly for 9 months, and included didactic nutrition education and activities to provide motivation for sustained dietary change. Outcomes included total fat and fat from nine food groups from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and a summary scale and five subscales that measure fat-related dietary habits. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Data are from 1702 post-menopausal women, recruited from clinical centres in Atlanta, Birmingham and Miami, with dietary assessments at baseline and 6 months post-randomization. RESULTS:Total fat intake was similar across race/ethnic groups at baseline, yet there were many differences in sources of fat and fat-related dietary habits. For example, blacks consumed less fat from dairy foods and more fat from meats than whites. Effects of the intervention on total fat intake or the summary fat-related dietary habits scale did not differ across race/ethnicity groups. There were, however, many differences in how the intervention affected sources of fat and fat-related dietary habits. For example, the intervention effect for added fats (e.g. butter and salad dressings) was -8.9 g for blacks and -12.0 g for whites (P<0.05). The intervention effect for adopting low-fat meat purchasing and preparation methods was larger for blacks than whites, and the intervention effect for replacing high-fat foods with fruits and vegetables was larger for Hispanics than whites. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, if properly designed, a single nutrition intervention programme can work well even in groups with culturally diverse dietary patterns.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This report examines how sources of fat and patterns of fat-related dietary habits differed between black, Hispanic and white women participating in a randomized trial of a low-fat diet intervention. DESIGN: The intervention consisted of group sessions, which met weekly for 6 weeks, biweekly for 6 weeks and monthly for 9 months, and included didactic nutrition education and activities to provide motivation for sustained dietary change. Outcomes included total fat and fat from nine food groups from a food frequency questionnaire (FFQ), and a summary scale and five subscales that measure fat-related dietary habits. SETTING/ SUBJECTS: Data are from 1702 post-menopausal women, recruited from clinical centres in Atlanta, Birmingham and Miami, with dietary assessments at baseline and 6 months post-randomization. RESULTS: Total fat intake was similar across race/ethnic groups at baseline, yet there were many differences in sources of fat and fat-related dietary habits. For example, blacks consumed less fat from dairy foods and more fat from meats than whites. Effects of the intervention on total fat intake or the summary fat-related dietary habits scale did not differ across race/ethnicity groups. There were, however, many differences in how the intervention affected sources of fat and fat-related dietary habits. For example, the intervention effect for added fats (e.g. butter and salad dressings) was -8.9 g for blacks and -12.0 g for whites (P<0.05). The intervention effect for adopting low-fat meat purchasing and preparation methods was larger for blacks than whites, and the intervention effect for replacing high-fat foods with fruits and vegetables was larger for Hispanics than whites. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that, if properly designed, a single nutrition intervention programme can work well even in groups with culturally diverse dietary patterns.
Authors: Daria M McMahon; James B Burch; James R Hébert; James W Hardin; Jiajia Zhang; Michael D Wirth; Shawn D Youngstedt; Nitin Shivappa; Steven J Jacobsen; Bette Caan; Stephen K Van Den Eeden Journal: Ann Epidemiol Date: 2018-11-02 Impact factor: 3.797
Authors: Corrine I Voils; Eugene Z Oddone; Kevin P Weinfurt; Joëlle Y Friedman; Cedric M Bright; Kevin A Schulman; Hayden B Bosworth Journal: J Natl Med Assoc Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 1.798
Authors: Michelle C Kegler; Iris Alcantara; J K Veluswamy; Regine Haardörfer; James A Hotz; Karen Glanz Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2012
Authors: Julienne K Kirk; Timothy Craven; Edward W Lipkin; Jeffrey Katula; Carolyn Pedley; Patrick J O'Connor; Karen L Margolis Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2013-03-13 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: John P Elder; Elva M Arredondo; Nadia Campbell; Barbara Baquero; Susan Duerksen; Guadalupe Ayala; Noe C Crespo; Noc C Crespo; Donald Slymen; Thomas McKenzie Journal: J Sch Health Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 2.118