Literature DB >> 22287099

Use of models in identification and prediction of physiology in critically ill surgical patients.

M J Cohen1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With higher-throughput data acquisition and processing, increasing computational power, and advancing computer and mathematical techniques, modelling of clinical and biological data is advancing rapidly. Although exciting, the goal of recreating or surpassing in silico the clinical insight of the experienced clinician remains difficult. Advances toward this goal and a brief overview of various modelling and statistical techniques constitute the purpose of this review.
METHODS: A review of the literature and experience with models and physiological state representation and prediction after injury was undertaken.
RESULTS: A brief overview of models and the thinking behind their use for surgeons new to the field is presented, including an introduction to visualization and modelling work in surgical care, discussion of state identification and prediction, discussion of causal inference statistical approaches, and a brief introduction to new vital signs and waveform analysis.
CONCLUSION: Modelling in surgical critical care can provide a useful adjunct to traditional reductionist biological and clinical analysis. Ultimately the goal is to model computationally the clinical acumen of the experienced clinician.
Copyright © 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22287099     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.7798

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  6 in total

Review 1.  Using what you get: dynamic physiologic signatures of critical illness.

Authors:  Andre L Holder; Gilles Clermont
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.598

2.  Heart rate variability analysis is more sensitive at identifying neonatal sepsis than conventional vital signs.

Authors:  Fredrick J Bohanon; Amy A Mrazek; Mohamed T Shabana; Sarah Mims; Geetha L Radhakrishnan; George C Kramer; Ravi S Radhakrishnan
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.565

3.  Predicting critical transitions in a model of systemic inflammation.

Authors:  Jeremy D Scheff; Steve E Calvano; Ioannis P Androulakis
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2013-08-21       Impact factor: 2.691

4.  Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.

Authors:  K Søreide; K Thorsen; J A Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 5.  Next-generation, personalised, model-based critical care medicine: a state-of-the art review of in silico virtual patient models, methods, and cohorts, and how to validation them.

Authors:  J Geoffrey Chase; Jean-Charles Preiser; Jennifer L Dickson; Antoine Pironet; Yeong Shiong Chiew; Christopher G Pretty; Geoffrey M Shaw; Balazs Benyo; Knut Moeller; Soroush Safaei; Merryn Tawhai; Peter Hunter; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.819

6.  Perceptions on the Use of Wearable Sensors and Continuous Monitoring in Surgical Patients: Interview Study Among Surgical Staff.

Authors:  Meera Joshi; Stephanie Archer; Abigail Morbi; Hutan Ashrafian; Sonal Arora; Sadia Khan; Graham Cooke; Ara Darzi
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-02-11
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.