Literature DB >> 22285180

Cediranib monotherapy in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: results of a randomised phase II study.

Peter Mulders1, Robert Hawkins, Paul Nathan, Igle de Jong, Susanne Osanto, Emilio Porfiri, Andrew Protheroe, Carla M L van Herpen, Bijoyesh Mookerjee, Laura Pike, Juliane M Jürgensmeier, Martin E Gore.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cediranib is a highly potent vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signalling inhibitor with activity against VEGF receptors 1, 2 and 3. This Phase II, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy of cediranib with placebo in patients with metastatic or recurrent clear cell renal cell carcinoma who had not previously received a VEGF signalling inhibitor.
METHODS: Patients were randomised (3:1) to cediranib 45 mg/day or placebo. The primary objective was comparison of change from baseline in tumour size after 12 weeks of therapy. Secondary objectives included response rate and duration, progression-free survival (PFS) and safety and tolerability. Patients in the placebo group could cross over to open-label cediranib at 12 weeks or earlier if their disease had progressed. This study has been completed and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00423332.
FINDINGS: Patients (n=71) were randomised to receive cediranib (n=53) or placebo (n=18). The primary study outcome revealed that, after 12weeks of therapy, there was a significant difference in mean percentage change from baseline in tumour size between the cediranib (-20%) and placebo (+20%) arms (p<0.0001). Eighteen patients (34%) on cediranib achieved a partial response and 25 (47%) experienced stable disease. Cediranib treatment prolonged PFS significantly compared with placebo (hazard ratio (HR)=0.45, 90%confidence interval: 0.26-0.76, p=0.017; median PFS 12.1 versus 2.8 months). The most common adverse events in patients receiving cediranib were diarrhoea (74%), hypertension (64%), fatigue (58%) and dysphonia (58%).
INTERPRETATION: Cediranib monotherapy demonstrated significant evidence of antitumour activity in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma. The adverse event profile was consistent with previous studies of cediranib 45 mg. Copyright Â
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22285180     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.12.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  30 in total

1.  Atypical reversible posterior leukoencephalopathy syndrome (RPLS) induced by cediranib in a patient with metastatic rectal cancer.

Authors:  Christina A K Kim; Julie Price-Hiller; Quincy S Chu; Keith Tankel; Ron Hennig; Michael B Sawyer; Jennifer L Spratlin
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-05-23       Impact factor: 3.850

2.  Indirect comparisons of efficacy and safety between seven newer targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A network meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials.

Authors:  Henry W C Leung; Agnes L F Chan; Shun-Jen Lin
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23

3.  Oral anticancer drugs: how limited dosing options and dose reductions may affect outcomes in comparative trials and efficacy in patients.

Authors:  Vinay Prasad; Paul R Massey; Tito Fojo
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Population pharmacokinetic and exposure simulation analysis for cediranib (AZD2171) in pooled Phase I/II studies in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Jianguo Li; Nidal Al-Huniti; Anja Henningsson; Weifeng Tang; Eric Masson
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.335

5.  A phase II study of cediranib as palliative treatment in patients with symptomatic malignant ascites or pleural effusion.

Authors:  S F Mulder; M J Boers-Sonderen; H F M van der Heijden; K C P Vissers; C J A Punt; C M L van Herpen
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Population exposure-safety analysis of cediranib for Phase I and II studies in patients with cancer.

Authors:  Nidal Al-Huniti; Klas Petersson; Weifeng Tang; Eric Masson; Jianguo Li
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 7.  Resistance to Targeted Therapies in Renal Cancer: The Importance of Changing the Mechanism of Action.

Authors:  I Duran; J Lambea; P Maroto; J L González-Larriba; Luis Flores; S Granados-Principal; M Graupera; B Sáez; A Vivancos; O Casanovas
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Phase II clinical trial of cediranib in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Authors:  William L Dahut; Ravi A Madan; Joyson J Karakunnel; David Adelberg; James L Gulley; Ismail B Turkbey; Cindy H Chau; Shawn D Spencer; Marcia Mulquin; John Wright; Howard L Parnes; Seth M Steinberg; Peter L Choyke; William D Figg
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-02-18       Impact factor: 5.588

9.  A randomized phase II study of cediranib alone versus cediranib in combination with dasatinib in docetaxel resistant, castration resistant prostate cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Spreafico; Kim N Chi; Srikala S Sridhar; David C Smith; Michael A Carducci; Peter Kavsak; Tracy S Wong; Lisa Wang; S Percy Ivy; Som Dave Mukherjee; Christian K Kollmannsberger; Mahadeo A Sukhai; Naoko Takebe; Suzanne Kamel-Reid; Lillian L Siu; Sebastien J Hotte
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2014-05-03       Impact factor: 3.850

Review 10.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Cediranib.

Authors:  Weifeng Tang; Alex McCormick; Jianguo Li; Eric Masson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.447

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.