Literature DB >> 22284688

Evaluation of field-in-field technique for total body irradiation.

Cem Onal1, Aydan Sonmez, Gungor Arslan, Serhat Sonmez, Esma Efe, Ezgi Oymak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the clinical use of a field-in-field (FIF) technique for total body irradiation (TBI) using a treatment-planning system (TPS) and to verify TPS results with in vivo dose measurements using metal-oxide-semiconductor field-effect transistor (MOSFET) detectors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Clinical and dosimetric data of 10 patients treated with TBI were assessed. Certain radiation parameters were measured using homogenous and regular phantoms at an extended distance of 380 cm, and the results were compared with data from a conventional standard distance of 100 cm. Additionally, dosimetric validation of TPS doses was performed with a Rando phantom using manual calculations. A three-dimensional computed tomography plan was generated involving 18-MV photon beams with a TPS for both open-field and FIF techniques. The midline doses were measured at the head, neck, lung, umbilicus, and pelvis for both open-field and FIF techniques.
RESULTS: All patients received planned TBI using the FIF technique with 18-MV photon energies and 2 Gy b.i.d. on 3 consecutive days. The difference in tissue maximum ratios between the extended and conventional distances was <2%. The mean deviation of manual calculations compared with TPS data was +1.6% (range, 0.1-2.4%). A homogenous dose distribution was obtained with 18-MV photon beams using the FIF technique. The mean lung dose for the FIF technique was 79.2% (9.2 Gy; range, 8.8-9.7 Gy) of the prescribed dose. The MOSFET readings and TPS doses in the body were similar (percentage difference range, -0.5% to 2.5%) and slightly higher in the shoulder and lung (percentage difference range, 4.0-5.5%).
CONCLUSION: The FIF technique used for TBI provides homogenous dose distribution and is feasible, simple, and spares time compared with more-complex techniques. The TPS doses were similar to the midline doses obtained from MOSFET readings.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22284688     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  6 in total

1.  Commissioning of total body irradiation using plastic bead bags.

Authors:  Yuichi Akino; Shintaro Maruoka; Katsuyuki Yano; Hiroshi Abe; Fumiaki Isohashi; Yuji Seo; Keisuke Tamari; Takero Hirata; Manabu Kawakami; Yoshiki Nakae; Yoshihiro Tanaka; Kazuhiko Ogawa
Journal:  J Radiat Res       Date:  2020-11-16       Impact factor: 2.724

2.  Total body irradiation with step translation and dynamic field matching.

Authors:  Ho-Hsing Chen; Jay Wu; Keh-Shih Chuang; Jia-Fu Lin; Jia-Cheng Lee; Jin-Ching Lin
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Modification of a modulated arc total body irradiation technique: Implementation and first clinical experience for paediatric patients.

Authors:  Melanie Pemberton; Carole Brady; Beth Taylor; Danielle Tyrrell; Lucy Sim; Sylwia Zawlodzka-Bednarz; Jennifer Biggs; Mitchell Peters; John Baines; Catriona Hargrave
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2018-09-19

4.  Early clinical experience with a total body irradiation technique using field-in-field beams and on-line image guidance.

Authors:  Ruud G H van Leeuwen; Drean Verwegen; Peter G M van Kollenburg; Marc Swinkels; Richard W M van der Maazen
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-10-01

5.  Two compound techniques for total body irradiation.

Authors:  Anders T Hansen; Hanne K Rose; Esben S Yates; Jolanta Hansen; Jørgen B B Petersen
Journal:  Tech Innov Patient Support Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-12-14

6.  Total body irradiation-an attachment free sweeping beam technique.

Authors:  Petra M Härtl; Marius Treutwein; Matthias G Hautmann; Manuel März; Fabian Pohl; Oliver Kölbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 3.481

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.