Literature DB >> 22281352

Imputation of genotypes with low-density chips and its effect on reliability of direct genomic values in Dutch Holstein cattle.

H A Mulder1, M P L Calus, T Druet, C Schrooten.   

Abstract

Genomic selection using 50,000 single nucleotide polymorphism (50k SNP) chips has been implemented in many dairy cattle breeding programs. Cheap, low-density chips make genotyping of a larger number of animals cost effective. A commonly proposed strategy is to impute low-density genotypes up to 50,000 genotypes before predicting direct genomic values (DGV). The objectives of this study were to investigate the accuracy of imputation for animals genotyped with a low-density chip and to investigate the effect of imputation on reliability of DGV. Low-density chips contained 384, 3,000, or 6,000 SNP. The SNP were selected based either on the highest minor allele frequency in a bin or the middle SNP in a bin, and DAGPHASE, CHROMIBD, and multivariate BLUP were used for imputation. Genotypes of 9,378 animals were used, from which approximately 2,350 animals had deregressed proofs. Bayesian stochastic search variable selection was used for estimating SNP effects of the 50k chip. Imputation accuracies and imputation error rates were poor for low-density chips with 384 SNP. Imputation accuracies were higher with 3,000 and 6,000 SNP. Performance of DAGPHASE and CHROMIBD was very similar and much better than that of multivariate BLUP for both imputation accuracy and reliability of DGV. With 3,000 SNP and using CHROMIBD or DAGPHASE for imputation, 84 to 90% of the increase in DGV reliability using the 50k chip, compared with a pedigree index, was obtained. With multivariate BLUP, the increase in reliability was only 40%. With 384 SNP, the reliability of DGV was lower than for a pedigree index, whereas with 6,000 SNP, about 93% of the increase in reliability of DGV based on the 50k chip was obtained when using DAGPHASE for imputation. Using genotype probabilities to predict gene content increased imputation accuracy and the reliability of DGV and is therefore recommended for applications of imputation for genomic prediction. A deterministic equation was derived to predict accuracy of DGV based on imputation accuracy, which fitted closely with the observed relationship. The deterministic equation can be used to evaluate the effect of differences in imputation accuracy on accuracy and reliability of DGV.
Copyright © 2012 American Dairy Science Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22281352     DOI: 10.3168/jds.2011-4490

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dairy Sci        ISSN: 0022-0302            Impact factor:   4.034


  34 in total

1.  High imputation accuracy from informative low-to-medium density single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes is achievable in sheep1.

Authors:  Aine C O'Brien; Michelle M Judge; Sean Fair; Donagh P Berry
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-04-03       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  The impact of reducing the frequency of animals genotyped at higher density on imputation and prediction accuracies using ssGBLUP1.

Authors:  Bruna P Sollero; Jeremy T Howard; Matthew L Spangler
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Computational strategies for the preconditioned conjugate gradient method applied to ssSNPBLUP, with an application to a multivariate maternal model.

Authors:  Jeremie Vandenplas; Herwin Eding; Maarten Bosmans; Mario P L Calus
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 4.297

4.  Genotyping, the Usefulness of Imputation to Increase SNP Density, and Imputation Methods and Tools.

Authors:  Florence Phocas
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

5.  Assessing single-nucleotide polymorphism selection methods for the development of a low-density panel optimized for imputation in South African Drakensberger beef cattle.

Authors:  Simon F Lashmar; Donagh P Berry; Rian Pierneef; Farai C Muchadeyi; Carina Visser
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: an example on broiler chicken.

Authors:  Daniela A L Lourenco; Breno O Fragomeni; Shogo Tsuruta; Ignacio Aguilar; Birgit Zumbach; Rachel J Hawken; Andres Legarra; Ignacy Misztal
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Imputation of high-density genotypes in the Fleckvieh cattle population.

Authors:  Hubert Pausch; Bernhard Aigner; Reiner Emmerling; Christian Edel; Kay-Uwe Götz; Ruedi Fries
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  Imputation of unordered markers and the impact on genomic selection accuracy.

Authors:  Jessica E Rutkoski; Jesse Poland; Jean-Luc Jannink; Mark E Sorrells
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 3.154

9.  Genomic prediction using imputed whole-genome sequence data in Holstein Friesian cattle.

Authors:  Rianne van Binsbergen; Mario P L Calus; Marco C A M Bink; Fred A van Eeuwijk; Chris Schrooten; Roel F Veerkamp
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.297

10.  Accuracy of imputation using the most common sires as reference population in layer chickens.

Authors:  Marzieh Heidaritabar; Mario P L Calus; Addie Vereijken; Martien A M Groenen; John W M Bastiaansen
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.