Literature DB >> 22281249

Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging results from SPARC (Study of myocardial perfusion and coronary anatomy imaging roles in coronary artery disease).

Rory Hachamovitch1, Benjamin Nutter, Mark A Hlatky, Leslee J Shaw, Michael L Ridner, Sharmila Dorbala, Rob S B Beanlands, Benjamin J W Chow, Elizabeth Branscomb, Panithaya Chareonthaitawee, W Guy Weigold, Szilard Voros, Suhny Abbara, Tsunehiro Yasuda, Jill E Jacobs, John Lesser, Daniel S Berman, Louise E J Thomson, Subha Raman, Gary V Heller, Adam Schussheim, Richard Brunken, Kim A Williams, Susan Farkas, Dominique Delbeke, Uwe J Schoepf, Nathaniel Reichek, Stuart Rabinowitz, Steven R Sigman, Randall Patterson, Carolyn R Corn, Richard White, Ella Kazerooni, James Corbett, Sabahat Bokhari, Josef Machac, Erminia Guarneri, Salvador Borges-Neto, John W Millstine, James Caldwell, James Arrighi, Udo Hoffmann, Matthew Budoff, Joao Lima, James R Johnson, Barbara Johnson, Mariya Gaber, Julie A Williams, Courtney Foster, Jon Hainer, Marcelo F Di Carli.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study examined short-term cardiac catheterization rates and medication changes after cardiac imaging.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive cardiac imaging is widely used in coronary artery disease, but its effects on subsequent patient management are unclear.
METHODS: We assessed the 90-day post-test rates of catheterization and medication changes in a prospective registry of 1,703 patients without a documented history of coronary artery disease and an intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease undergoing cardiac single-photon emission computed tomography, positron emission tomography, or 64-slice coronary computed tomography angiography.
RESULTS: Baseline medication use was relatively infrequent. At 90 days, 9.6% of patients underwent catheterization. The rates of catheterization and medication changes increased in proportion to test abnormality findings. Among patients with the most severe test result findings, 38% to 61% were not referred to catheterization, 20% to 30% were not receiving aspirin, 35% to 44% were not receiving a beta-blocker, and 20% to 25% were not receiving a lipid-lowering agent at 90 days after the index test. Risk-adjusted analyses revealed that compared with stress single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography, changes in aspirin and lipid-lowering agent use was greater after computed tomography angiography, as was the 90-day catheterization referral rate in the setting of normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal test results.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, noninvasive testing had only a modest impact on clinical management of patients referred for clinical testing. Although post-imaging use of cardiac catheterization and medical therapy increased in proportion to the degree of abnormality findings, the frequency of catheterization and medication change suggests possible undertreatment of higher risk patients. Patients were more likely to undergo cardiac catheterization after computed tomography angiography than after single-photon emission computed tomography or positron emission tomography after normal/nonobstructive and mildly abnormal study findings. (Study of Perfusion and Anatomy's Role in Coronary Artery [CAD] [SPARC]; NCT00321399).
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22281249     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.09.066

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  60 in total

1.  Relationship of left ventricular mass to coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial ischaemia: the CORE320 multicenter study.

Authors:  Satoru Kishi; Tiago A Magalhaes; Richard T George; Marc Dewey; Roger J Laham; Hiroyuki Niinuma; Lisa Aronson Friedman; Christopher Cox; Yutaka Tanami; Joanne D Schuijf; Andrea L Vavere; Kakuya Kitagawa; Marcus Y Chen; Cesar H Nomura; Jeffrey A Brinker; Frank J Rybicki; Marcelo F Di Carli; Armin Arbab-Zadeh; Joao A C Lima
Journal:  Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-11-02       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 2.  Assessment of coronary heart disease by CT angiography: current and evolving applications.

Authors:  Abhishek Sharma; Armin Arbab-Zadeh
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

3.  Patient management after noninvasive cardiac imaging: a commentary on the reported results from SPARC.

Authors:  George A Beller
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  Prognosis in the era of comparative effectiveness research: where is nuclear cardiology now and where should it be?

Authors:  Leslee J Shaw; Fadi G Hage; Daniel S Berman; Rory Hachamovitch; Ami Iskandrian
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Coronary CT angiography after stress testing: an efficient use of resources? Implications of the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium (ACIC) results.

Authors:  Kavitha M Chinnaiyan; Gilbert L Raff; Karthik Ananthasubramaniam
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Quantitative Coronary Physiology for Clinical Management: the Imaging Standard.

Authors:  K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Cost and resource utilization associated with use of computed tomography to evaluate chest pain in the emergency department: the Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography (ROMICAT) study.

Authors:  Edward Hulten; Alexander Goehler; Marcio Sommer Bittencourt; Fabian Bamberg; Christopher L Schlett; Quynh A Truong; John Nichols; Khurram Nasir; Ian S Rogers; Scott G Gazelle; John T Nagurney; Udo Hoffmann; Ron Blankstein
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2013-09-10

Review 8.  Assessing clinical impact of myocardial perfusion studies: ischemia or other prognostic indicators?

Authors:  Todd D Miller; John Wells Askew; Joerg Herrmann
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Assessing the prognostic implications of myocardial perfusion studies: identification of patients at risk vs patients who may benefit from intervention?

Authors:  Paul Cremer; Rory Hachamovitch
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 10.  Use of cardiac CT and calcium scoring for detecting coronary plaque: implications on prognosis and patient management.

Authors:  S Divakaran; M K Cheezum; E A Hulten; M S Bittencourt; M G Silverman; K Nasir; R Blankstein
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.