AIM: To identify patients who can obtain the full benefit from targeted temperature management (TTM) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of comatose patients treated with TTM after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from January 2006 to February 2011. Neurological outcome was evaluated with the Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance category (CPC) at discharge and predictors were determined. RESULTS: Of 66 patients studied, 40 (60.6%) survived to neurologically intact discharge (CPC 1 or 2). According to multivariate analysis, predictors of good neurological outcome included arrest-to-first cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt interval ≤5 min, ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia in the first monitored rhythm, absence of re-arrest before leaving the emergency department, arrest-to-return of spontaneous circulation interval ≤30 min and recovery of pupillary light reflex, which were identifiable in the emergency department. Based on this analysis, we developed a seven-point score (5-R score). If the score was ≥5, it predicted good neurological outcome with a sensitivity of 82.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.2-92.7%) and specificity of 92.3% (95% CI, 74.9-99.1%). The negative predictive value of a score ≥4 was 100% (95% CI, 81.5-100%). Our prediction model was validated internally by a bootstrapping technique. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction protocol using the 5-R score was associated with good neurological outcome of patients treated with TTM. Therefore, it could be helpful in clinical decision making on whether to initiate cooling.
AIM: To identify patients who can obtain the full benefit from targeted temperature management (TTM) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of comatosepatients treated with TTM after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest from January 2006 to February 2011. Neurological outcome was evaluated with the Glasgow-Pittsburgh Cerebral Performance category (CPC) at discharge and predictors were determined. RESULTS: Of 66 patients studied, 40 (60.6%) survived to neurologically intact discharge (CPC 1 or 2). According to multivariate analysis, predictors of good neurological outcome included arrest-to-first cardiopulmonary resuscitation attempt interval ≤5 min, ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia in the first monitored rhythm, absence of re-arrest before leaving the emergency department, arrest-to-return of spontaneous circulation interval ≤30 min and recovery of pupillary light reflex, which were identifiable in the emergency department. Based on this analysis, we developed a seven-point score (5-R score). If the score was ≥5, it predicted good neurological outcome with a sensitivity of 82.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 67.2-92.7%) and specificity of 92.3% (95% CI, 74.9-99.1%). The negative predictive value of a score ≥4 was 100% (95% CI, 81.5-100%). Our prediction model was validated internally by a bootstrapping technique. CONCLUSIONS: The prediction protocol using the 5-R score was associated with good neurological outcome of patients treated with TTM. Therefore, it could be helpful in clinical decision making on whether to initiate cooling.
Authors: Teresa L May; Christine W Lary; Richard R Riker; Hans Friberg; Nainesh Patel; Eldar Søreide; John A McPherson; Johan Undén; Robert Hand; Kjetil Sunde; Pascal Stammet; Stein Rubertsson; Jan Belohlvaek; Allison Dupont; Karen G Hirsch; Felix Valsson; Karl Kern; Farid Sadaka; Johan Israelsson; Josef Dankiewicz; Niklas Nielsen; David B Seder; Sachin Agarwal Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2019-03-08 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Cindy H Hsu; Jiaqi Li; Marisa J Cinousis; Kelsey R Sheak; David F Gaieski; Benjamin S Abella; Marion Leary Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-12 Impact factor: 7.598