Literature DB >> 22280496

Use of radioactive compounds and autoradiography to determine drug tissue distribution.

Eric G Solon1.   

Abstract

Radioactivity has been used in drug discovery and development for several decades because it offers researchers a highly sensitive way to quantitatively assess the absorption, distribution, metabolism, and/or excretion (ADME) of chemical entities by incorporating a radioactive isotope into the structure of the drug molecule. Regulatory agencies around the world require drug makers to characterize the ADME properties of prospective new drugs as one way to help ensure that patients are not exposed to dangerous drug and/or drug metabolite levels before they can be approved for human use. Radiolabeled compounds have consistently proved to be the most efficient tool for determining that information, even though attempts have been made to use nonradioactive techniques. The techniques of quantitative whole-body autoradiography (QWBA) and microautoradiography (MARG), which rely on the use of radiolabeled drugs, are two techniques that are routinely used to examine tissue distribution of drugs in discovery and development. These techniques provide drug researchers with quantitative tissue concentration data and a visual location of those concentrations in intact organs, tissues, and cells of laboratory animals. It is important for readers to realize that these techniques visualize total radioactivity, which can include the parent molecule along with its metabolites, and/or degradation products or impurities. This requires investigators to treat the quantitative data with caution unless the identity of the radioactivity is determined using some type of other bioanalytical techniques, such as mass spectroscopy and/or radio-HPLC, which can be easily performed on the tissue obtained from the animals used for QWBA and/or MARG. Nevertheless, these data are used in drug discovery and development to answer questions related to tissue penetration, fetal/placental transfer, tissue retention, routes of elimination, drug-drug interactions, enzyme induction/inhibition, formulation comparisons, in vivo compound solubility, differential metabolite distribution, interspecies comparisons, and to predict human exposure to parent drugs, metabolites, and radiation during clinical studies. This review will consider the strategic use of WBA, QWBA, and MARG in the pharmaceutical industry. Case studies and anecdotal information will also be presented; however, readers should realize that these are general examples and that some details have been omitted for brevity and/or because the data is proprietary and could not be presented at this time. Nevertheless, the images and discussions are provided to demonstrate how the techniques can and have been used to examine in situ tissue distribution of therapeutic compounds.
© 2012 American Chemical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22280496     DOI: 10.1021/tx200509f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  19 in total

Review 1.  Cysteine cathepsins: their role in tumor progression and recent trends in the development of imaging probes.

Authors:  Reik Löser; Jens Pietzsch
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2015-06-23       Impact factor: 5.221

2.  Localization of sunitinib, its metabolites and its target receptors in tumour-bearing mice: a MALDI-MS imaging study.

Authors:  S Torok; A Vegvari; M Rezeli; T E Fehniger; J Tovari; S Paku; V Laszlo; B Hegedus; A Rozsas; B Dome; G Marko-Varga
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 3.  Mass spectrometry imaging of therapeutics from animal models to three-dimensional cell cultures.

Authors:  Xin Liu; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Introduction: use of radioactive compounds in drug discovery and development.

Authors:  F Peter Guengerich
Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 3.739

5.  Comparison of the Tissue Distribution of a Long-Circulating Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Agonist Determined by Positron Emission Tomography and Quantitative Whole-Body Autoradiography.

Authors:  Eduardo Felipe Alves Fernandes; Jonas Wilbs; Rene Raavé; Christian Borch Jacobsen; Hanne Toftelund; Hans Helleberg; Milou Boswinkel; Sandra Heskamp; Magnus Bernt Frederik Gustafsson; Inga Bjørnsdottir
Journal:  ACS Pharmacol Transl Sci       Date:  2022-06-30

Review 6.  Pipeline Impact of Radiolabeled Compounds in Drug Discovery and Development.

Authors:  Srirajan Vaidyanathan; Aimee Reed
Journal:  ACS Med Chem Lett       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 4.632

Review 7.  Qualitative and quantitative mass spectrometry imaging of drugs and metabolites.

Authors:  Christopher B Lietz; Erin Gemperline; Lingjun Li
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 15.470

8.  Developing a Drug Screening Platform: MALDI-Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Paper-Based Cultures.

Authors:  Fernando Tobias; Julie C McIntosh; Gabriel J LaBonia; Matthew W Boyce; Matthew R Lockett; Amanda B Hummon
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 6.986

9.  Interrogating the relationship between rat in vivo tissue distribution and drug property data for >200 structurally unrelated molecules.

Authors:  Andrew W Harrell; Caroline Sychterz; May Y Ho; Andrew Weber; Klara Valko; Kitaw Negash
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2015-08-10

10.  Imaging mass spectrometry for the precise design of antibody-drug conjugates.

Authors:  Yuki Fujiwara; Masaru Furuta; Shino Manabe; Yoshikatsu Koga; Masahiro Yasunaga; Yasuhiro Matsumura
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.