Literature DB >> 22279435

Neurovascular imaging.

Anna Devor1, David Boas.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22279435      PMCID: PMC3260454          DOI: 10.3389/fnene.2012.00001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics        ISSN: 1662-6427


× No keyword cloud information.
In this e-book we present a collection of papers submitted to Frontiers in Neuroenergetics in response to the “Special topic” initiative titled “Neurovascular Imaging.” Advances in imaging technology, both optical and MRI based methods, traditionally have played (and continue playing) a major role in the advancement of neuroscience in general and in the understanding of cerebral blood flow and metabolism in particular. Therefore, our initial intent was to highlight the technological advances and impact they had on neurovascular/neurometabolic research, including description of the key biological results. However, it was the last aspect of our proposal – the biological results – that was met with the most overwhelming enthusiasm. Thus, while improvements of imaging technology are featured in the majority of the included articles, the main focus is on using those technological advances to better understand neurovascular and neurometabolic coupling. So, what does it take to make significant progress in understanding of this coupling? First, as in every study in this e-book, it requires a team of investigators armed with state-of-the-art measurement tools and a novel (“transformative”) approach, a.k.a. imagination. Second, one has to recognize the limitations of their measurement tools and consider the measurement theory – the relationship between the experimental “observables” and the underlying physiological parameters (Harris et al., 2010; Lindauer et al., 2010; Logothetis, 2010; Vanzetta and Slovin, 2010). For example, although BOLD fMRI measures deoxyhemoglobin, one has to consider both intra- and extravascular contributions to the signal and effects of vessel size, which vary as a function of the magnetic field of an MRI scanner. Likewise, one has to account for specific experimental conditions producing a biological behavior that might or might not translate to the intact brain situation (Filosa, 2010). Finally, merely the number of physiological parameters, which interact to produce a biological behavior, necessitates the use of computational modeling (Buxton, 2010). In particular, a solid theoretical framework is required to bridge between micro- and macroscopic levels of description – a critical step for translation of basic science observations in healthy brain (Cauli and Hamel, 2010; Hamilton et al., 2010; Saka et al., 2010; Sirotin and Das, 2010; Vazquez et al., 2010; Kleinfeld et al., 2011) and in experimental disorders (Luckl et al., 2010) to human studies (Koch et al., 2010; Lindauer et al., 2010; Obrig et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2011). With the continuing development of optical (Akkin et al., 2010; Gregg et al., 2010; Hu and Wang, 2010; Srienc et al., 2010) and MRI (Harel et al., 2010; Hyder et al., 2010; Lin et al., 2011) imaging technology, and the steadily increasing availability of specific fluorescent and MR-visible indicators (Barros, 2010), our ability to probe the biological mechanisms underlying functional hyperemia is on a steep rise. Importantly, new methods allow not only measurement, but also well-controlled manipulations (Allegra Mascaro et al., 2010; Kleinfeld et al., 2011) crucial for testing causality rather than simply establishing a correlation between measurement parameters (that does not automatically imply that one of the parameters drives the other). Moreover, the present collection of papers reaches well beyond the current state of knowledge, defining important questions and roadmaps for future research (Buxton, 2010; Cauli and Hamel, 2010; Hamilton et al., 2010; Vazquez et al., 2010; Kleinfeld et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2011). For us, Neurovascular Imaging is a lifetime-long affair that combines the magic of imaging (“seeing is believing”) with the enigma of neurovascular communication waiting to be resolved, and the excitement of basic discovery with satisfaction of the usefulness/medical relevance of the results. We hope that the present collection of papers will be of particular encouragement for the young people in the field. The Neurovascular Imaging train is on a fast track toward genuine understanding of neurovascular and neurometabolic mechanisms with outstanding clinical importance.
  24 in total

1.  Interpreting oxygenation-based neuroimaging signals: the importance and the challenge of understanding brain oxygen metabolism.

Authors:  Richard B Buxton
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-06-17

2.  From acoustic segmentation to language processing: evidence from optical imaging.

Authors:  Hellmuth Obrig; Sonja Rossi; Silke Telkemeyer; Isabell Wartenburger
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-06-23

3.  Linear superposition of sensory-evoked and ongoing cortical hemodynamics.

Authors:  Mohamad Saka; Jason Berwick; Myles Jones
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-08-27

4.  Pathophysiological interference with neurovascular coupling - when imaging based on hemoglobin might go blind.

Authors:  Ute Lindauer; Ulrich Dirnagl; Martina Füchtemeier; Caroline Böttiger; Nikolas Offenhauser; Christoph Leithner; Georg Royl
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-10-04

5.  Multi-photon nanosurgery in live brain.

Authors:  Anna Letizia Allegra Mascaro; Leonardo Sacconi; Francesco S Pavone
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-07-30

6.  Neurovascular photoacoustic tomography.

Authors:  Song Hu; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-06-17

7.  High-resolution optical functional mapping of the human somatosensory cortex.

Authors:  Stefan P Koch; Christina Habermehl; Jan Mehnert; Christoph H Schmitz; Susanne Holtze; Arno Villringer; Jens Steinbrink; Hellmuth Obrig
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-06-14

8.  A BOLD Assumption.

Authors:  Ivo Vanzetta; Hamutal Slovin
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-08-05

9.  Vascular tone and neurovascular coupling: considerations toward an improved in vitro model.

Authors:  Jessica A Filosa
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-08-16

10.  Does neural input or processing play a greater role in the magnitude of neuroimaging signals?

Authors:  Sam Harris; Myles Jones; Ying Zheng; Jason Berwick
Journal:  Front Neuroenergetics       Date:  2010-08-11
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  Neurophotonics: non-invasive optical techniques for monitoring brain functions.

Authors:  Alessandro Torricelli; Davide Contini; Alberto Dalla Mora; Antonio Pifferi; Rebecca Re; Lucia Zucchelli; Matteo Caffini; Andrea Farina; Lorenzo Spinelli
Journal:  Funct Neurol       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec

Review 2.  Emerging imaging methods to study whole-brain function in rodent models.

Authors:  Marija Markicevic; Iurii Savvateev; Christina Grimm; Valerio Zerbi
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 6.222

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.