| Literature DB >> 20740075 |
Sam Harris1, Myles Jones, Ying Zheng, Jason Berwick.
Abstract
An important constraint on how hemodynamic neuroimaging signals such as fMRI can be interpreted in terms of the underlying evoked activity is an understanding of neurovascular coupling mechanisms that actually generate hemodynamic responses. The predominant view at present is that the hemodynamic response is most correlated with synaptic input and subsequent neural processing rather than spiking output. It is still not clear whether input or processing is more important in the generation of hemodynamics responses. In order to investigate this we measured the hemodynamic and neural responses to electrical whisker pad stimuli in rat whisker barrel somatosensory cortex both before and after the local cortical injections of the GABA(A) agonist muscimol. Muscimol would not be expected to affect the thalamocortical input into the cortex but would inhibit subsequent intra-cortical processing. Pre-muscimol infusion whisker stimuli elicited the expected neural and accompanying hemodynamic responses to that reported previously. Following infusion of muscimol, although the temporal profile of neural responses to each pulse of the stimulus train was similar, the average response was reduced in magnitude by approximately 79% compared to that elicited pre-infusion. The whisker-evoked hemodynamic responses were reduced by a commensurate magnitude suggesting that, although the neurovascular coupling relationships were similar for synaptic input as well as for cortical processing, the magnitude of the overall response is dominated by processing rather than from that produced from the thalamocortical input alone.Entities:
Keywords: barrel cortex; muscimol; neurovascular coupling; synaptic activity; whisker
Year: 2010 PMID: 20740075 PMCID: PMC2927268 DOI: 10.3389/fnene.2010.00015
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Neuroenergetics ISSN: 1662-6427
Figure 1Hemodynamic responses in a representative animal before and after local cortical infusion of muscimol. (A) gray level CCD camera image of the somatosensory cortical surface. The electrode with drug infusion probe attached is visible on the right hand side of the image. (B) An image of combined photomicrographs of post-mortem histological sections of the cortical surface and the underling cortical barrels from Layer IV. (C) Total blood volume (Hbt), Deoxyhemoglobin (Hbr) and Oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) responses to 16-s electrical stimulation of the whisker pad. Each image represents an average change in micromolar concentration from baseline over the 16-s stimulation period. (D) Time series of hemodynamics response prior to muscimol infusion from a region of interest around the electrode tip (solid lines) and an additional ROI distal to the electrode in the more anterior whisker barrels (dotted lines). (E) Hemodynamic response images post muscimol injection. (F) Time series of hemodynamics response post muscimol infusion from a region of interest around the electrode tip (solid lines) and an additional ROI distal to the electrode in the more anterior whisker barrels (dotted lines).
Figure 2Average hemodynamic responses across animals (. (Error bars = SEM).
Figure 3The results of current source density (CSD) of multi laminar local field potential responses elicited by electrical whisker pad stimuli pre and post muscimol infusion. (A) Representative animal impulse averaged CSD response prior to muscimol infusion. (B) Time series of layer IV CSD-sink averaged across animals before muscimol infusion. (C) Averaged CSD response post muscimol infusion for the same animal as in (A). (D) Time series of layer IV CSD-sink averaged across animals post muscimol infusion (E) Time series of impulse averaged layer IV CSD-sink response pre (blue) and post (red) muscimol injection (error bars = SEM).
Magnitude of hemodynamic and neuronal responses before and after muscimol infusion.
| Animal | Hbt control | Hbt muscimol | CSD-sink control | CSD-sink muscimol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 416.1 | 117.0 | 0.09 | 0.01 |
| 2 | 262.6 | 106.3 | 0.09 | 0.04 |
| 3 | 217.5 | 95.7 | 0.20 | 0.04 |
| 4 | 347.6 | 77.4 | 0.17 | 0.03 |
| 5 | 417.9 | 42.4 | 0.24 | 0.03 |
| 6 | 325.8 | 116.6 | 0.11 | 0.07 |
| 7 | 375.2 | 73.1 | 0.57 | 0.10 |
| 8 | 136.8 | 57.3 | 0.08 | 0.02 |
| Mean | 312.4 | 87.5 | 0.19 | 0.04 |
| (%Reduction) | (72%) | (79%) | ||
| SEM | 35.2 | 9.8 | 0.06 | 0.01 |