Literature DB >> 21765424

Adaptation of the simple or complex nature of V1 receptive fields to visual statistics.

Julien Fournier1, Cyril Monier, Marc Pananceau, Yves Frégnac.   

Abstract

Receptive fields in primary visual cortex (V1) are categorized as simple or complex, depending on their spatial selectivity to stimulus contrast polarity. We studied the dependence of this classification on visual context by comparing, in the same cell, the synaptic responses to three classical receptive field mapping protocols: sparse noise, ternary dense noise and flashed Gabor noise. Intracellular recordings revealed that the relative weights of simple-like and complex-like receptive field components were scaled so as to make the same receptive field more simple-like with dense noise stimulation and more complex-like with sparse or Gabor noise stimulations. However, once these context-dependent receptive fields were convolved with the corresponding stimulus, the balance between simple-like and complex-like contributions to the synaptic responses appeared to be invariant across input statistics. This normalization of the linear/nonlinear input ratio suggests a previously unknown form of homeostatic control of V1 functional properties, optimizing the network nonlinearities to the statistical structure of the visual input.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21765424     DOI: 10.1038/nn.2861

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Neurosci        ISSN: 1097-6256            Impact factor:   24.884


  48 in total

1.  Rapid adaptation in visual cortex to the structure of images.

Authors:  J R Müller; A B Metha; J Krauskopf; P Lennie
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-08-27       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  Dynamic modification of cortical orientation tuning mediated by recurrent connections.

Authors:  Gidon Felsen; Yao-song Shen; Haishan Yao; Gareth Spor; Chaoyi Li; Yang Dan
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-12-05       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Functionally distinct inhibitory neurons at the first stage of visual cortical processing.

Authors:  Judith A Hirsch; Luis M Martinez; Cinthi Pillai; Jose-Manuel Alonso; Qingbo Wang; Friedrich T Sommer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-11-16       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Natural stimulus statistics alter the receptive field structure of v1 neurons.

Authors:  Stephen V David; William E Vinje; Jack L Gallant
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2004-08-04       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Activity-dependent regulation of 'on' and 'off' responses in cat visual cortical receptive fields.

Authors:  D Debanne; D E Shulz; Y Fregnac
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-04-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Dynamics of neuronal firing correlation: modulation of "effective connectivity".

Authors:  A M Aertsen; G L Gerstein; M K Habib; G Palm
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Spatiotemporal organization of simple-cell receptive fields in the cat's striate cortex. II. Linearity of temporal and spatial summation.

Authors:  G C DeAngelis; I Ohzawa; R D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Spatial tuning of cells in and around lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: X and Y relay cells and perigeniculate interneurons.

Authors:  Y T So; R Shapley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Receptive field organization of complex cells in the cat's striate cortex.

Authors:  J A Movshon; I D Thompson; D J Tolhurst
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Stimulus contrast modulates functional connectivity in visual cortex.

Authors:  Ian Nauhaus; Laura Busse; Matteo Carandini; Dario L Ringach
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2008-11-23       Impact factor: 24.884

View more
  25 in total

1.  The empirical characteristics of human pattern vision defy theoretically-driven expectations.

Authors:  Peter Neri
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-04       Impact factor: 4.475

2.  The accuracy of membrane potential reconstruction based on spiking receptive fields.

Authors:  Deepankar Mohanty; Benjamin Scholl; Nicholas J Priebe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 3.  Multiscale modeling of mechanotransduction in the utricle.

Authors:  Jong-Hoon Nam; J W Grant; M H Rowe; E H Peterson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2019-04-17       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Efficient and adaptive sensory codes.

Authors:  Wiktor F Młynarski; Ann M Hermundstad
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2021-05-20       Impact factor: 24.884

5.  The role of delayed suppression in slow and fast contrast adaptation in V1 simple cells.

Authors:  Manuel Levy; Julien Fournier; Yves Frégnac
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Spatial Correlations in Natural Scenes Modulate Response Reliability in Mouse Visual Cortex.

Authors:  Rajeev V Rikhye; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  Imaging light responses of foveal ganglion cells in the living macaque eye.

Authors:  Lu Yin; Benjamin Masella; Deniz Dalkara; Jie Zhang; John G Flannery; David V Schaffer; David R Williams; William H Merigan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Categorically distinct types of receptive fields in early visual cortex.

Authors:  Vargha Talebi; Curtis L Baker
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Multidimensional receptive field processing by cat primary auditory cortical neurons.

Authors:  Craig A Atencio; Tatyana O Sharpee
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-07-08       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Nonlinear Processing of Shape Information in Rat Lateral Extrastriate Cortex.

Authors:  Giulio Matteucci; Rosilari Bellacosa Marotti; Margherita Riggi; Federica B Rosselli; Davide Zoccolan
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.