Literature DB >> 22278703

Can "YouTube" help students in learning surface anatomy?

Samy A Azer1.   

Abstract

AIMS: In a problem-based learning curriculum, most medical students research the Internet for information for their "learning issues." Internet sites such as "YouTube" have become a useful resource for information. This study aimed at assessing YouTube videos covering surface anatomy.
METHOD: A search of YouTube was conducted from November 8 to 30, 2010 using research terms "surface anatomy," "anatomy body painting," "living anatomy," "bone landmarks," and "dermatomes" for surface anatomy-related videos. Only relevant video clips in the English language were identified and related URL recorded. For each videotape the following information were collected: title, authors, duration, number of viewers, posted comments, and total number of days on YouTube. The data were statistically analyzed and videos were grouped into educationally useful and non-useful videos on the basis of major and minor criteria covering technical, content, authority, and pedagogy parameters.
RESULTS: A total of 235 YouTube videos were screened and 57 were found to have relevant information to surface anatomy. Analysis revealed that 15 (27%) of the videos provided useful information on surface anatomy. These videos scored (mean ± SD, 14.0 ± 0.7) and mainly covered surface anatomy of the shoulder, knee, muscles of the back, leg, and ankle, carotid artery, dermatomes, and anatomical positions. The other 42 (73%) videos were not useful educationally, scoring (mean ± SD, 7.4 ± 1.8). The total viewers of all videos were 1,058,634. Useful videos were viewed by 497,925 (47% of total viewers). The total viewership per day was 750 for useful videos and 652 for non-useful videos. No video clips covering surface anatomy of the head and neck, blood vessels and nerves of upper and lower limbs, chest and abdominal organs/structures were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Currently, YouTube is an inadequate source of information for learning surface anatomy. More work is needed from medical schools and educators to add useful videos on YouTube covering this area.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278703     DOI: 10.1007/s00276-012-0935-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat        ISSN: 0930-1038            Impact factor:   1.246


  10 in total

1.  Can YouTube enhance student nurse learning?

Authors:  Andrew Clifton; Claire Mann
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2010-10-30       Impact factor: 3.442

2.  YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Keelan; Vera Pavri-Garcia; George Tomlinson; Kumanan Wilson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Diffusion of innovation in the age of YouTube.

Authors:  Sarah E Lillie
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 5.043

4.  Nursing education 2.0: YouTube.

Authors:  Diane J Skiba
Journal:  Nurs Educ Perspect       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr

5.  Web 2.0 tools in medical and nursing school curricula.

Authors:  Trey Lemley; Judy F Burnham
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2009-01

6.  Using on-line video clips to enhance self-efficacy toward dealing with difficult situations among nursing students.

Authors:  Sally A McConville; Andrew M Lane
Journal:  Nurse Educ Today       Date:  2005-11-21       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Ambarish Pandey; Nivedita Patni; Mansher Singh; Akshay Sood; Gayatri Singh
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 5.043

8.  Human papillomavirus vaccination coverage on YouTube.

Authors:  Kevin A Ache; Lorraine S Wallace
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2008-08-03       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  YouTube as source of prostate cancer information.

Authors:  Peter L Steinberg; Shaun Wason; Joshua M Stern; Levi Deters; Brian Kowal; John Seigne
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.649

10.  Wikis, blogs and podcasts: a new generation of Web-based tools for virtual collaborative clinical practice and education.

Authors:  Maged N Kamel Boulos; Inocencio Maramba; Steve Wheeler
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 2.463

  10 in total
  22 in total

1.  Web-based teaching video packages on anatomical education.

Authors:  Mehmet Asim Ozer; Figen Govsa; Ayse Hilal Bati
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 1.246

2.  Mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases: how useful are medical textbooks, eMedicine, and YouTube?

Authors:  Samy A Azer
Journal:  Adv Physiol Educ       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 2.288

3.  Exploring Visualisation for Embryology Education: A Twenty-First-Century Perspective.

Authors:  Eiman M Abdel Meguid; Jane C Holland; Iain D Keenan; Priti Mishall
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Assessing the Impact of Interactive Educational Videos and Screencasts Within Pre-clinical Microanatomy and Medical Physiology Teaching.

Authors:  Alistair Robson; Yarrow Scantling-Birch; Stuart Morton; Deepika Anbu; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2022       Impact factor: 2.622

5.  Does an Additional Online Anatomy Course Improve Performance of Medical Students on Gross Anatomy Examinations?

Authors:  Ana Yoe-Cheng Chang Chan; Eugene J F M Custers; Maarten Simon van Leeuwen; Ronald L A W Bleys; Olle Ten Cate
Journal:  Med Sci Educ       Date:  2019-05-30

6.  Accuracy and Quality of Educational Videos for Elbow Physical Examination: A Search from the Earliest Year until October 2018.

Authors:  Elisa L Zwerus; Rik J Molenaars; Michel P J van den Bekerom; Bertram The; Denise Eygendaal
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-01

7.  Discussing dissection in anatomy education.

Authors:  Esther M Bergman
Journal:  Perspect Med Educ       Date:  2015-10

8.  Nervous system examination on YouTube.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Sarah M Aleshaiwi; Hala A Algrain; Rana A Alkhelaif
Journal:  BMC Med Educ       Date:  2012-12-22       Impact factor: 2.463

9.  Is content really king? An objective analysis of the public's response to medical videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Tejas Desai; Afreen Shariff; Vibhu Dhingra; Deeba Minhas; Megan Eure; Mark Kats
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Evaluation of the educational value of YouTube videos about physical examination of the cardiovascular and respiratory systems.

Authors:  Samy A Azer; Hala A Algrain; Rana A AlKhelaif; Sarah M AlEshaiwi
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.428

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.