Literature DB >> 22278058

Gated regulation of CRAC channel ion selectivity by STIM1.

Beth A McNally1, Agila Somasundaram, Megumi Yamashita, Murali Prakriya.   

Abstract

Two defining functional features of ion channels are ion selectivity and channel gating. Ion selectivity is generally considered an immutable property of the open channel structure, whereas gating involves transitions between open and closed channel states, typically without changes in ion selectivity. In store-operated Ca(2+) release-activated Ca(2+) (CRAC) channels, the molecular mechanism of channel gating by the CRAC channel activator, stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1), remains unknown. CRAC channels are distinguished by a very high Ca(2+) selectivity and are instrumental in generating sustained intracellular calcium concentration elevations that are necessary for gene expression and effector function in many eukaryotic cells. Here we probe the central features of the STIM1 gating mechanism in the human CRAC channel protein, ORAI1, and identify V102, a residue located in the extracellular region of the pore, as a candidate for the channel gate. Mutations at V102 produce constitutively active CRAC channels that are open even in the absence of STIM1. Unexpectedly, although STIM1-free V102 mutant channels are not Ca(2+)-selective, their Ca(2+) selectivity is dose-dependently boosted by interactions with STIM1. Similar enhancement of Ca(2+) selectivity is also seen in wild-type ORAI1 channels by increasing the number of STIM1 activation domains that are directly tethered to ORAI1 channels, or by increasing the relative expression of full-length STIM1. Thus, exquisite Ca(2+) selectivity is not an intrinsic property of CRAC channels but rather a tuneable feature that is bestowed on otherwise non-selective ORAI1 channels by STIM1. Our results demonstrate that STIM1-mediated gating of CRAC channels occurs through an unusual mechanism in which permeation and gating are closely coupled.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22278058      PMCID: PMC3276717          DOI: 10.1038/nature10752

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nature        ISSN: 0028-0836            Impact factor:   49.962


Functional CRAC channels are tetramers of Orai1 subunits [3-5], with the pore flanked by residues of the first transmembrane domain (TM1) of each subunit [6,7](. To localize the gate region that governs STIM1-dependent activation, we mutated individual pore-lining residues to Cys and analyzed state-dependent differences in the sensitivity of mutant channels to methanethiosulfonate (MTS) Cys-reactive reagents [6,8]. Because the unusually narrow CRAC channel pore [9,10] prevents entry of the relatively large MTS reagents [6], we performed these studies in the E106D Orai1 mutant, which exhibits a wider pore, yet maintains store-dependent activation [10]. In this background, several TM1 pore-lining residues including V102C and G98C became accessible to the small MTS reagent, MTSEA, with G98C exhibiting particularly strong sensitivity to this reagent (, ). Inhibition of G98C by MTSEA could be protected by La3+ (, which blocks CRAC channels by binding to residues in the outer vestibule [6], consistent with modification of G98C occurring from within the pore. To determine differences in MTSEA accessibility between closed and open channels, we quantified relief of MTSEA blockade elicited by the reducing agent, bis(2-mercaptoethylsulfone) (BMS) [6]. Resting cells were exposed to MTSEA for 100-120 s and subsequently, CRAC current (ICRAC) was activated by passive store depletion (. These experiments indicated that modification of G98C was profoundly state-dependent, with no modification occurring in closed channels (. By contrast, D110C, a pore-lining residue located in the outer vestibule, was modified to similar extents in both closed and open states (. The most straightforward explanation for this result is that the closed channel conformation prevents access of MTSEA to G98C, suggesting that the gate is located external to G98, but below D110. As the key pore-lining TM1 residues in this region are E106 and V102, the gated access of G98C implicates these residues as potential candidates for the gate. E106 controls Ca2+ selectivity [11-13] and is not thought to regulate store-operated gating [10], leaving V102 as a residue worthy of further scrutiny. Previous reports suggest that V102 is very close to the central symmetry axis of the channel [6,7], i.e., in a narrow constriction of the pore. If V102 is a component of the gating mechanism, mutations at this locus would be predicted to destabilize channel gating. Consistent with this possibility, a Cys mutation of V102 eliminated store-dependent gating. Cells expressing V102C Orai1 and STIM1 displayed a large standing ICRAC upon whole-cell break-in (. Moreover, resting cells exhibited constitutive Ca2+ entry and activation of the Ca2+-dependent transcription factor, NFAT ( indicating that V102C Orai1 channels are constitutively active. Several lines of evidence indicated that the constitutive activation of V102C Orai1 is STIM1-independent. Large La3+-sensitive standing currents were observed in cells expressing V102C Orai1 alone ( Further, Ca2+ imaging and NFAT activation experiments revealed constitutive Ca2+ entry in these cells (. Recent evidence indicates that STIM1 drives the redistribution of Orai1 into discrete puncta following ER store depletion [2]. However, when expressed alone, V102C Orai1 remained diffusely distributed ( Moreover, ICRAC in these cells did not show Ca2+-dependent fast inactivation (CDI) (. Because puncta formation and CDI require STIM1 [14-16], these results indicate that when over-expressed alone, the mutant channels are functionally free of STIM1. Additionally, knockdown of endogenous STIM1 in HEK293 cells did not affect the constitutive V102C current (). However, when V102C Orai1 was co-expressed with STIM1, puncta formation, interaction with STIM1, and CDI were indistinguishable from the behavior of WT Orai1 (. Additional analyses indicated that introducing the mutations, E106A or R91W, which abrogate store-operated Orai1 activity [11,12,17] strongly diminished V102C Orai1 currents (, indicating that these residues are essential for both store-operated and constitutive activation modes of Orai1. Mutation of the equivalent residue in Orai3 (V77C) also resulted in a STIM1-independent activation phenotype similar to that seen in V102C Orai1 (). Together, these results indicate that the V102C mutation destabilizes the channel gate, resulting in STIM1-independent constitutive Orai1 activation. Many ion channels including nAChRs and MscL channels are reported to employ hydrophobic residues (Leu, Val, and Ile) as gates to inhibit the flux of hydrated ions [18,19,20] To explore the possibility that V102 comprises a hydrophobic gate in Orai1, we investigated the side-chain dependence of constitutive activation at this position. We observed constitutive activity with several mildly hydrophobic and polar substitutions, including Cys, Gly, Ala, Ser and Thr (. Conversely, substitutions to the highly hydrophobic amino acids Leu, Ile, and Met resulted in only STIM1-dependent activation, as seen in WT Orai1. Large hydrophobic residues such as Trp, Tyr, and Phe diminished both constitutive and STIM1-induced currents, as expected for a position in a narrow region of the pore [6,7](. Substitutions to extremely polar residues such as Glu, Asp, Lys, and Arg resulted in non-functional channels with or without STIM1, likely due to secondary effects of these mutations on the nearby selectivity filter at E106. Despite these deviations, however, the overall pattern is consistent with the hypothesis that V102 comprises a hydrophobic gate, with less hydrophobic residues producing a leaky gate. CRAC channels are extraordinarily Ca2+ selective and poorly permeable to the large monovalent cation, Cs+. However, the ion selectivity of STIM1-free V102C Orai1 channels differed from WT Orai1 channels in these respects. STIM1-free V102C Orai1 channels displayed significantly lower Ca2+ permeability, as evidenced by the left-shifted reversal potentials of mutant Ca2+ currents (). Consistent with this interpretation, replacement of extracellular Na+ with NMDG+, an impermeant ion, revealed significant Na+ conduction in these channels (). Direct estimates of fractional Ca2+ currents using fluo-4 indicated that V102C Orai1 conducts only 36% of the Ca2+ carried by WT Orai1 in 20 mM Ca2+ (). Additionally, unlike WT channels, STIM1-free V102C channels were highly permeable to the large monovalent cation, Cs+ (. Unexpectedly, co-expressing exogenous STIM1 together with V102C Orai1 enhanced the Ca2+ permeability and lowered the Cs+ permeability of V102C Orai1, effectively correcting its aberrant ion selectivity (. STIM1 also modified permeation of V102C Orai1 for Ba2+ and Sr2+ (. Modification of ion selectivity by STIM1 was not unique to V102C Orai1, but occurred in all constitutively active V102x mutants (. These changes in ion selectivity required direct STIM1-Orai1 interactions, as modification of V102C Orai1 ion selectivity was nullified in the V102C L276D Orai1 double mutant (, in which STIM1-Orai1 binding was impaired ([21]. STIM1-free and STIM1-bound V102C channels also displayed very different minimal pore widths ( directly demonstrating that STIM1 alters the pore structure of V102C channels. Further analyses, using concatenated Orai1 dimers (described in the supplementary text), indicated that the subunit stoichiometry of STIM1-free and STIM1-bound mutant channels are identical, arguing that their distinct permeation properties are due to different pore structures of fully assembled, tetrameric channels rather than different subunit stoichiometries (). Collectively, these results indicate that STIM1 binding modifies the structural features of the mutant channel pore, bestowing permeation properties classically associated with CRAC channels. The normalization of ion selectivity of mutant channels by STIM1 suggests that their altered ion selectivity in the absence of STIM1 is not merely a byproduct of the mutations, but rather indicative of a native intermediate activation state not readily seen in WT channels due to a closed gate. Recent studies indicate that Orai1 channels are activated in a non-linear and cooperative manner by STIM1, with maximal channel activation requiring binding of 8 STIM1 molecules per channel [15,22,23]. We reasoned that if modification of ion selectivity is coupled to the stoichiometry of STIM1 binding, then partial activation of WT Orai1 by a sub-saturating concentration of STIM1 may lead to incomplete normalization of ion selectivity, revealing an intermediate activation state. To test this hypothesis, we used constructs in which WT Orai1 was tethered to either one or two functional STIM1 (S) domains (resulting in four or eight S domains per channel, respectively) as recently described [23]. We found that WT Orai1 channels tethered to one S domain per subunit produced currents that were smaller and displayed diminished CDI compared to Orai1-SS currents (, as expected from the known requirement of STIM1 for CRAC channel activation and inactivation [15,22,23]. Importantly, reversal potential measurements and ion substitution experiments indicated that unlike Orai1-SS channels, Orai1-S channels exhibited diminished Ca2+ and enhanced Cs+ selectivity ( Similar effects were seen when WT Orai1 was expressed with limiting concentrations of full-length STIM1 ( These results support the hypothesis that the V102 mutations stabilize an intermediate channel activation state. To gauge the dose-dependence of ion selectivity modulation by STIM1, we examined reversal potentials of V102C and WT channels tagged to zero, one or two S domains (. Despite the different starting functional states of WT (closed) and V102C (open) channels, STIM1 caused similar, dose-dependent alterations in ion selectivity in both cases, while concomitantly enhancing activation of WT channels (. Thus, Orai1 channel activation and changes in ion selectivity likely result from the same underlying energetic changes driven by STIM1 binding. Collectively, our results show that mutations at V102 cause constitutive activation of Orai1 channels through a mechanism likely involving destabilization of the channel gate at V102. This disposition of the STIM1 activation gate, in the extracellular region of the pore close to the selectivity filter (E106), is strikingly different from the familiar structural designs in K+ channels, and voltage-gated Ca2+ (Cav) channels, which are constructed with the gate located at the cytoplasmic end of the pore [24]. We exploited the constitutive channel activity resulting from mutations in the putative gate to identify an unusual ion channel gating mode in which STIM1 regulates ion selectivity and the pore architecture of CRAC channels. Activation by STIM1 bestows several key distinctive characteristics classically associated with CRAC channels including high Ca2+ selectivity, low Cs+ permeability, and a narrow pore to otherwise non-selective Orai1 channels. Although the underlying mechanism remains to be established, the close proximity of the putative STIM1 activation gate (V102) to the selectivity filter (E106) likely contributes to the tight coupling of permeation and gating during channel activation. The altered ion selectivity of Orai1 channels when STIM1 is limiting is reminiscent of the ion selectivity of Orai1 and Orai3 channels directly activated by the compound, 2-APB, which exhibit lower Ca2+ selectivity and higher Cs+ selectivity than STIM1-activated Orai channels [25-28]. These findings indicate that the exquisite Ca2+ selectivity of CRAC channels is not an intrinsic and immutable property of Orai1 but is rather uniquely manifested only in response to STIM1 gating. Given emerging evidence indicating that Orai1 can be activated in a STIM1-independent manner by other cellular activators [29], these results suggest that activation of highly Ca2+ selective or non-selective Orai1 currents may be a general mechanism for cells to tune Ca2+ and Na+ entry through Orai1 channels depending on the nature of the upstream activation signal.

METHODS SUMMARY

ICRAC was recorded in the standard whole-cell patch clamp configuration in HEK293 cells overexpressing the indicated Orai1 constructs in a bicistronic expression vector that also expressed GFP. The membrane potential was stepped from +30 mV (holding) to -100 mV (100 ms) followed by a ramp from -100 to +100 mV (100 ms) applied every second in a 20 mM Ca2+-containing Ringer's solution. MTS reagents or Cd2+ were added to the extracellular Ringer's or divalent-free solution at the indicated concentrations. Second order rate constants of MTSEA blockade were determined at a constant holding potential of -80 mV as previously described [6]. Additional details are provided in the Methods.

METHODS

Cells

HEK293 cells were maintained in suspension in a medium containing CD293 supplemented with 4 mM GlutaMAX (Invitrogen) at 37°C, 5% CO2. For imaging and electrophysiology, cells were plated and adhered to poly-L-lysine coated coverslips at the time of passage, and grown in a medium containing 44% DMEM (Mediatech), 44% Ham's F12 (Mediatech), 10% fetal calf serum (HyClone), 2 mM glutamine, 50 U/ml penicillin and 50 μg/ml streptomycin.

Plasmids and transfections

Cys mutations employed for electrophysiology were engineered into the previously described C-terminal myc-tagged Orai1 construct (MO7O Orai1) in the bicistronic expression vector pMSCV-CITE-eGFP-PGK-Puro [11]. The basic “building blocks” for generating the tandem dimers (monomeric Orai1 (MO7O) and the Bluescript SK+ vector with Orai1 attached to a linker) were kind gifts of Dr. Trevor Shuttleworth (U. of Rochester)[3]. The orientation and number of subunits in the final constructs were confirmed by restriction enzyme analysis and Western blotting. The eGFP-Orai1-S and eGFP-Orai1-SS constructs were kind gifts of Dr. Tau Xu (Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China). The Orai1-CFP, STIM1-YFP, and CFP-Orai3 plasmids have been previously described [2128]. Site-directed mutagenesis to generate Orai1 mutations was performed using the QuikChange™ Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Stratagene) according to manufacturer's instructions and confirmed by DNA sequencing. For electrophysiology, the indicated Orai1 constructs were transfected into HEK293 cells either alone or together with a construct expressing unlabeled STIM1 (pCMV6-XL5, Origene Technologies). Cells were transfected with the indicated STIM1 and/or Orai1 cDNA (ratio of 1:10 by mass for electrophysiology) using TransPass D2 (NEB Labs) and studied 24 hours later. Cells transfected with siSTIM1 (Ambion) were studied 72 h following transfection.

Electrophysiology

Currents were recorded in the standard whole-cell configuration at room temperature on an Axopatch 200B amplifier (Molecular Devices) interfaced to an ITC-18 input/output board (Instrutech). Routines developed by R. Lewis (Stanford) on the Igor Pro software (Wavemetrics) and modified by M. Prakriya were employed for stimulation, data acquisition and analysis. Data are corrected for the liquid junction potential of the pipette solution relative to Ringer's in the bath (-10 mV). The holding potential was +30 mV. The standard voltage stimulus consisted of a 100-ms step to –100 mV followed by a 100-ms ramp from –100 to +100 mV applied at 1 s intervals. In most examples, the peak currents during the -100 mV pulse were measured for analysis. For examining Ca2+-dependent fast inactivation, the voltage protocol consisted of a 300-ms step to -100 mV applied at 2 s intervals. Unless otherwise indicated, ICRAC was activated by passive depletion of intracellular Ca2+ stores by internal dialysis of 8 mM BAPTA through the pipette solution. To obviate complications arising from the changing membrane potential in standard step-ramp voltage protocol, rate constants of blockade by MTS reagents were determined at a constant potential of -80 mV by acquiring 200 ms sweeps of current at 4 Hz. All currents were acquired at 5 kHz and low pass filtered with a 1 kHz Bessel filter built into the amplifier. All data were corrected for liquid junction potential of the pipette solution and for leak currents collected in 50-150 μM LaCl3.

MTS reagent protocol

The protocol for analysis of state-dependent modification of Orai1-bearing Cys mutants is described in . For the D110C mutant, this protocol was slightly modified to adjust for the formation of spontaneous disulfide bonds in this mutant [6]. The protocol included an additional application of the reducing agent BMS (90-120 s) prior to any MTSEA (or Cd2+) application to remove preexisting disulfide bonds, as described previously [6].

Solutions

The standard extracellular Ringer's solution contained (in mM): 130 NaCl, 4.5 KCl, 20 CaCl2, 10 TEA-Cl, 10 D-glucose, and 5 Na-HEPES (pH 7.4). The Divalent free (DVF) Ringer's solution contained: 150 NaCl, 10 HEDTA, 1 EDTA, 10 TEA-Cl, and 5 Hepes (pH 7.4). The 110 mM Ca2+ solution contained 110 CaCl2, 10 D-Glucose, and 5 Hepes (pH 7.4). The standard internal (pipette) solution contained 135 Cs aspartate, 8 MgCl2, 8 BAPTA, and 10 Cs-HEPES (pH 7.2). In experiments examining CDI, BAPTA was replaced with EGTA to accentuate CDI. In these experiments, the internal solution contained (in mM) 125 Cs aspartate, 10 EGTA, 3 MgCl2, 8 NaCl, and 10 Cs-HEPES(pH 7.2). Stock solutions of MTS reagents (Toronto Research Chemicals) were prepared as previously described [6].

Data analysis

Reversal potentials were measured from the average of several leak-subtracted sweeps (4-6) in each cell. Measurements were taken in 6-15 cells per mutant per condition. In cases where the I-V curve asymptotically approached the X-axis with no clear reversal (e.g. in some WT Orai1 expressing cells), the reversal potential was assigned as +80 mV. MTSEA reaction rate constant was estimated from single exponential fits to the current decline following MTSEA application. The apparent second order modification rate constant k was calculated from the relationship: where [MTS] is the concentration of the MTS reagent. Relative permeabilities were calculated from changes in the reversal potential using the Goldman-Hodgkin-Katz (GHK) voltage equation: where R, T, and F have their usual meanings, and P and P are the permeabilities of the test ion and Na+, respectively, [X] and [Na] are the ionic concentrations, and ΔErev is the shift in reversal potential when the test cation is exchanged for Na+. To estimate the minimal width of Orai1 channels, the relative permeabilities for a series of organic monovalent cations of increasing size were examined as described before [10]. The cations used were: ammonium (3.2 Å), methylammonium (3.78 Å), dimethylammonium (4.6 Å), and trimethylammonium (5.34 Å). These experiments were carried out in buffered Ca2+-free solutions to avoid the potent blocking effects of Ca2+ ions on monovalent ICRAC. The data were fit to the hydrodynamic relationship [10]: where d is the diameter of the tested ion and d the apparent width of the pore. All data were corrected for leak currents collected in 20 mM Ca2+ + 50-150 μM La3+. All curve fitting was done by least-squares methods using built-in functions in Igor Pro 5.0.
  30 in total

1.  CRACM1 multimers form the ion-selective pore of the CRAC channel.

Authors:  Monika Vig; Andreas Beck; James M Billingsley; Annette Lis; Suhel Parvez; Christine Peinelt; Dana L Koomoa; Jonathan Soboloff; Donald L Gill; Andrea Fleig; Jean-Pierre Kinet; Reinhold Penner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-09-14       Impact factor: 10.834

2.  Regulation of CRAC channel activity by recruitment of silent channels to a high open-probability gating mode.

Authors:  Murali Prakriya; Richard S Lewis
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.086

3.  Orai1 subunit stoichiometry of the mammalian CRAC channel pore.

Authors:  Olivier Mignen; Jill L Thompson; Trevor J Shuttleworth
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Molecular identification of the CRAC channel by altered ion selectivity in a mutant of Orai.

Authors:  Andriy V Yeromin; Shenyuan L Zhang; Weihua Jiang; Ying Yu; Olga Safrina; Michael D Cahalan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-08-20       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  A mutation in Orai1 causes immune deficiency by abrogating CRAC channel function.

Authors:  Stefan Feske; Yousang Gwack; Murali Prakriya; Sonal Srikanth; Sven-Holger Puppel; Bogdan Tanasa; Patrick G Hogan; Richard S Lewis; Mark Daly; Anjana Rao
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2006-04-02       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Store-dependent and -independent modes regulating Ca2+ release-activated Ca2+ channel activity of human Orai1 and Orai3.

Authors:  Shenyuan L Zhang; J Ashot Kozak; Weihua Jiang; Andriy V Yeromin; Jing Chen; Ying Yu; Aubin Penna; Wei Shen; Victor Chi; Michael D Cahalan
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-04-17       Impact factor: 5.157

7.  Orai1 mutations alter ion permeation and Ca2+-dependent fast inactivation of CRAC channels: evidence for coupling of permeation and gating.

Authors:  Megumi Yamashita; Laura Navarro-Borelly; Beth A McNally; Murali Prakriya
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.086

8.  2-Aminoethoxydiphenyl borate directly facilitates and indirectly inhibits STIM1-dependent gating of CRAC channels.

Authors:  Christine Peinelt; Annette Lis; Andreas Beck; Andrea Fleig; Reinhold Penner
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-04-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate alters selectivity of Orai3 channels by increasing their pore size.

Authors:  Rainer Schindl; Judith Bergsmann; Irene Frischauf; Isabella Derler; Marc Fahrner; Martin Muik; Reinhard Fritsch; Klaus Groschner; Christoph Romanin
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-05-21       Impact factor: 5.157

10.  And yet it moves: conformational States of the Ca2+ channel pore.

Authors:  Riccardo Olcese
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  115 in total

1.  Insights into CRAC channel gating and ion permeation.

Authors:  Patrick G Hogan
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 25.617

Review 2.  Store-Operated Calcium Channels.

Authors:  Murali Prakriya; Richard S Lewis
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 37.312

3.  Optogenetic control of endogenous Ca(2+) channels in vivo.

Authors:  Taeyoon Kyung; Sangkyu Lee; Jung Eun Kim; Taesup Cho; Hyerim Park; Yun-Mi Jeong; Dongkyu Kim; Anna Shin; Sungsoo Kim; Jinhee Baek; Jihoon Kim; Na Yeon Kim; Doyeon Woo; Sujin Chae; Cheol-Hee Kim; Hee-Sup Shin; Yong-Mahn Han; Daesoo Kim; Won Do Heo
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 54.908

4.  A calcium-accumulating region, CAR, in the channel Orai1 enhances Ca(2+) permeation and SOCE-induced gene transcription.

Authors:  Irene Frischauf; Vasilina Zayats; Michael Deix; Anna Hochreiter; Isaac Jardin; Martin Muik; Barbara Lackner; Barbora Svobodová; Teresa Pammer; Monika Litviňuková; Amrutha Arumbakam Sridhar; Isabella Derler; Ivan Bogeski; Christoph Romanin; Rüdiger H Ettrich; Rainer Schindl
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 8.192

Review 5.  Numbers count: How STIM and Orai stoichiometry affect store-operated calcium entry.

Authors:  Michelle Yen; Richard S Lewis
Journal:  Cell Calcium       Date:  2019-02-12       Impact factor: 6.817

Review 6.  Permeation, selectivity and gating in store-operated CRAC channels.

Authors:  Beth A McNally; Murali Prakriya
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2012-05-14       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Opening of an alternative ion permeation pathway in a nociceptor TRP channel.

Authors:  Joris Vriens; Katharina Held; Annelies Janssens; Balázs István Tóth; Sara Kerselaers; Bernd Nilius; Rudi Vennekens; Thomas Voets
Journal:  Nat Chem Biol       Date:  2014-01-05       Impact factor: 15.040

8.  CRAC channel gating and its modulation by STIM1 and 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate.

Authors:  Sher Ali; Tao Xu; Xiaolan Xu
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2016-11-13       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Sequential Steps of CRAC Channel Activation.

Authors:  Raz Palty; Zhu Fu; Ehud Y Isacoff
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 10.  The STIM-Orai Pathway: Orai, the Pore-Forming Subunit of the CRAC Channel.

Authors:  Aparna Gudlur; Patrick G Hogan
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.622

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.