Literature DB >> 22277311

Breast surgeons performing immediate breast reconstruction with implants - assessment of resource-use and patient-reported outcome measures.

S Robertson1, Y Wengström, C Eriksen, K Sandelin.   

Abstract

Oncoplastic surgery, including immediate breast reconstruction (IBR), is expanding as a result of public demand. IBR in women with breast carcinoma is resource intense and the reconstruction is often completed concurrently with adjuvant oncological treatment. A series of 223 patients with implant-based IBRs, performed by breast surgeons 2005-2008, were analysed for use of resources and outcome. Low overall major complication rates (19,7%) were identified, even though 41% of the patients had received post-mastectomy radiation. A total of 1.1 reoperations per patient were required. Patient-reported outcomes using the EQ-5D and a disease-specific questionnaire at a median of four years follow-up were analysed. Patients' general health-state was high (0.83), whereas negative impact on intimate situations and the sensibility of the breast was reported. Our audit concludes that trained breast surgeon specialists perform implant-based IBRs with a satisfactory outcome when evaluated by subjective and objective analyses.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22277311     DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2012.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast        ISSN: 0960-9776            Impact factor:   4.380


  8 in total

1.  Factors influencing the decision to pursue immediate breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer.

Authors:  Mariska Weenk; Philipp Wunschel; Erwin Heine; Luc J Strobbe
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2017-02

2.  Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction with the use of biological and synthetic meshes in one-stage implant-based breast reconstruction.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Xiangyu Wang; Ping Bai; Xiangyi Kong; Zhongzhao Wang; Yi Fang; Jing Wang
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-01-03       Impact factor: 3.307

3.  Differences in breast aesthetic outcomes due to radiation: A validated, quantitative analysis of expander-implant reconstruction.

Authors:  Lauren M Mioton; Jessica Gaido; William Small; Neil A Fine; John Y Kim
Journal:  Can J Plast Surg       Date:  2013

Review 4.  Prosthetic breast reconstruction: indications and update.

Authors:  Tam T Quinn; George S Miller; Marie Rostek; Miguel S Cabalag; Warren M Rozen; David J Hunter-Smith
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2016-04

5.  National study of the impact of patient information and involvement in decision-making on immediate breast reconstruction rates.

Authors:  A Frisell; J Lagergren; J de Boniface
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 6.939

Review 6.  From radical mastectomy to breast-conserving therapy and oncoplastic breast surgery: a narrative review comparing oncological result, cosmetic outcome, quality of life, and health economy.

Authors:  Ahmad Kaviani; Nassim Sodagari; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Vahid Eslami; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; Amin Safavi; Maryam Noparast; Alfred Fitoussi
Journal:  ISRN Oncol       Date:  2013-09-12

7.  Postoperative outcomes of breast reconstruction after mastectomy: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Qinghong Qin; Qixing Tan; Bin Lian; Qinguo Mo; Zhen Huang; Changyuan Wei
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  A Systematic Literature Review of Health Utility Values in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Manraj N Kaur; Jiajun Yan; Anne F Klassen; Justin P David; Dilshan Pieris; Manraj Sharma; Louise Bordeleau; Feng Xie
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 2.749

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.