Literature DB >> 22276546

Cross-generational effects of sexual harassment on female fitness in the guppy.

Clelia Gasparini1, Alessandro Devigili, Andrea Pilastro.   

Abstract

Sexual harassment is a common outcome of sexual conflict over mating rate. A large number of studies have identified several direct costs to females of sexual harassment including energy expenditure and reduced foraging ability. However, the fitness consequences of sexual harassment for descendants have rarely been investigated. Here, we manipulated the level of sexual harassment and mating rate in two groups of female guppies, Poecilia reticulata, a live-bearing fish in which sexual conflict over mating rate is particularly pronounced. Each female was allowed to interact with three males for one day (low sexual harassment, LSH) or for eight days (high sexual harassment, HSH) during each breeding cycle throughout their life. Female lifetime fecundity did not differ between the groups, but we found a strong effect on offspring fitness. HSH females produced (1) daughters with smaller bodies and (2) sons with shorter gonopodia, which were less attractive to females and less successful in coercive matings than their LSH counterparts. Although these results may be influenced by the indirect effects of sex ratio differences between treatments, they suggest that sexual harassment and elevated mating rate can have negative cross-generational fitness effects and more profound evolutionary consequences than currently thought.
© 2011 The Author(s). Evolution© 2011 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22276546     DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01455.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  10 in total

Review 1.  The limits of sexual conflict in the narrow sense: new insights from waterfowl biology.

Authors:  Patricia L R Brennan; Richard O Prum
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.

Authors:  Jennifer C Perry; Locke Rowe
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Indirect parental effects on offspring viability by egg-derived fluids in an external fertilizer.

Authors:  Rowan A Lymbery; Jacob D Berson; Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-12-09       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Transgenerational effects of maternal sexual interactions in seed beetles.

Authors:  Susanne R K Zajitschek; Damian K Dowling; Megan L Head; Eduardo Rodriguez-Exposito; Francisco Garcia-Gonzalez
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Seasonal reproduction of male Gambusia holbrooki (eastern mosquitofish) from two Florida lakes.

Authors:  Thea M Edwards; Hilary D Miller; Gunnar Toft; Louis J Guillette
Journal:  Fish Physiol Biochem       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 2.794

6.  Quantitative genetic insights into the coevolutionary dynamics of male and female genitalia.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans; Emile van Lieshout; Clelia Gasparini
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-05-29       Impact factor: 5.349

7.  Fitness consequences of female multiple mating: a direct test of indirect benefits.

Authors:  Miguel Barbosa; Sean R Connolly; Mizue Hisano; Maria Dornelas; Anne E Magurran
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2012-09-15       Impact factor: 3.260

8.  Female social response to male sexual harassment in poeciliid fish: a comparison of six species.

Authors:  Marco Dadda
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-09-29

9.  Lifetime number of mates interacts with female age to determine reproductive success in female guppies.

Authors:  Jonathan P Evans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Comparative analyses of reproductive structures in harvestmen (opiliones) reveal multiple transitions from courtship to precopulatory antagonism.

Authors:  Mercedes M Burns; Marshal Hedin; Jeffrey W Shultz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.