Literature DB >> 22276404

Decreasing the proportion of self-control trials during the acquisition period does not compromise the learning advantages in a self-controlled context.

Jae T Patterson1, Michael Carter, Elizabeth Sanli.   

Abstract

The present experiment examined the learning effects of participants self-controlling their receipt of knowledge of results (KR) on all or half of their acquisition trials (50%). For participants who were provided 50% self-control, the first half of their acquisition period consisted of receiving KR on all trials, or according to a faded-KR schedule. Participants practiced a sequential timing task. The results showed that independent of practice condition, participants who self-controlled their KR during the acquisition period demonstrated superior performance compared to the respective yoked conditions in the retention and transfer portion of the experiment. These results extend previous research by suggesting that decreasing the proportion of self-control trials does not compromise learning in a self-controlled context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 22276404     DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2011.10599799

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport        ISSN: 0270-1367            Impact factor:   2.500


  9 in total

Review 1.  Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning.

Authors:  Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-10

2.  Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-12

3.  An interpolated activity during the knowledge-of-results delay interval eliminates the learning advantages of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2016-02-18

4.  Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex does not enhance the learning benefits of self-controlled feedback schedules.

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Victoria Smith; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-02-27

5.  Understanding Self-Controlled Motor Learning Protocols through the Self-Determination Theory.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Sanli; Jae T Patterson; Steven R Bray; Timothy D Lee
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-11

6.  Self-controlled feedback is effective if it is based on the learner's performance: a replication and extension of Chiviacowsky and Wulf (2005).

Authors:  Michael J Carter; Anthony N Carlsen; Diane M Ste-Marie
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-11-19

7.  Reduction of Feedback Availability Limits Self-Control Effects.

Authors:  Aaron D von Lindern; Jeffrey T Fairbrother
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2022-03-29

8.  Learner-Controlled Self-Observation is Advantageous for Motor Skill Acquisition.

Authors:  Diane M Ste-Marie; Kelly A Vertes; Barbi Law; Amanda M Rymal
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-17

9.  Self-controlled learning: the importance of protecting perceptions of competence.

Authors:  Suzete Chiviacowsky; Gabriele Wulf; Rebecca Lewthwaite
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-11-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.