RATIONALE: Embryonic and fetal myocardial growth is characterized by a dramatic increase in myocyte number, but whether the expansion of the myocyte compartment is dictated by activation and commitment of resident cardiac stem cells (CSCs), division of immature myocytes or both is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we tested whether prenatal cardiac development is controlled by activation and differentiation of CSCs and whether division of c-kit-positive CSCs in the mouse heart is triggered by spontaneous Ca(2+) oscillations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report that embryonic-fetal c-kit-positive CSCs are self-renewing, clonogenic and multipotent in vitro and in vivo. The growth and commitment of c-kit-positive CSCs is responsible for the generation of the myocyte progeny of the developing heart. The close correspondence between values computed by mathematical modeling and direct measurements of myocyte number at E9, E14, E19 and 1 day after birth strongly suggests that the organogenesis of the embryonic heart is dependent on a hierarchical model of cell differentiation regulated by resident CSCs. The growth promoting effects of c-kit-positive CSCs are triggered by spontaneous oscillations in intracellular Ca(2+), mediated by IP3 receptor activation, which condition asymmetrical stem cell division and myocyte lineage specification. CONCLUSIONS: Myocyte formation derived from CSC differentiation is the major determinant of cardiac growth during development. Division of c-kit-positive CSCs in the mouse is promoted by spontaneous Ca(2+) spikes, which dictate the pattern of stem cell replication and the generation of a myocyte progeny at all phases of prenatal life and up to one day after birth.
RATIONALE: Embryonic and fetal myocardial growth is characterized by a dramatic increase in myocyte number, but whether the expansion of the myocyte compartment is dictated by activation and commitment of resident cardiac stem cells (CSCs), division of immature myocytes or both is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we tested whether prenatal cardiac development is controlled by activation and differentiation of CSCs and whether division of c-kit-positive CSCs in the mouse heart is triggered by spontaneous Ca(2+) oscillations. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report that embryonic-fetal c-kit-positive CSCs are self-renewing, clonogenic and multipotent in vitro and in vivo. The growth and commitment of c-kit-positive CSCs is responsible for the generation of the myocyte progeny of the developing heart. The close correspondence between values computed by mathematical modeling and direct measurements of myocyte number at E9, E14, E19 and 1 day after birth strongly suggests that the organogenesis of the embryonic heart is dependent on a hierarchical model of cell differentiation regulated by resident CSCs. The growth promoting effects of c-kit-positive CSCs are triggered by spontaneous oscillations in intracellular Ca(2+), mediated by IP3 receptor activation, which condition asymmetrical stem cell division and myocyte lineage specification. CONCLUSIONS: Myocyte formation derived from CSC differentiation is the major determinant of cardiac growth during development. Division of c-kit-positive CSCs in the mouse is promoted by spontaneous Ca(2+) spikes, which dictate the pattern of stem cell replication and the generation of a myocyte progeny at all phases of prenatal life and up to one day after birth.
Authors: Bram van Wijk; Gert van den Berg; Radwan Abu-Issa; Phil Barnett; Saskia van der Velden; Martina Schmidt; Jan M Ruijter; Margaret L Kirby; Antoon F M Moorman; Maurice J B van den Hoff Journal: Circ Res Date: 2009-07-23 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Claudia Bearzi; Annarosa Leri; Francesco Lo Monaco; Marcello Rota; Arantxa Gonzalez; Toru Hosoda; Martino Pepe; Khaled Qanud; Caroline Ojaimi; Silvana Bardelli; Domenico D'Amario; David A D'Alessandro; Robert E Michler; Stefanie Dimmeler; Andreas M Zeiher; Konrad Urbanek; Thomas H Hintze; Jan Kajstura; Piero Anversa Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Marcello Rota; Jan Kajstura; Toru Hosoda; Claudia Bearzi; Serena Vitale; Grazia Esposito; Grazia Iaffaldano; M Elena Padin-Iruegas; Arantxa Gonzalez; Roberto Rizzi; Narissa Small; John Muraski; Roberto Alvarez; Xiongwen Chen; Konrad Urbanek; Roberto Bolli; Steven R Houser; Annarosa Leri; Mark A Sussman; Piero Anversa Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2007-10-26 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nick Barker; Johan H van Es; Jeroen Kuipers; Pekka Kujala; Maaike van den Born; Miranda Cozijnsen; Andrea Haegebarth; Jeroen Korving; Harry Begthel; Peter J Peters; Hans Clevers Journal: Nature Date: 2007-10-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Lauro M Takeuchi; Dieter Saur; Barbara Seidler; Susan M Dymecki; Jia Jia Mai; Ian A White; Wayne Balkan; Rosemeire M Kanashiro-Takeuchi; Andrew V Schally; Joshua M Hare Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Mathias H Konstandin; Haruhiro Toko; Grady M Gastelum; Pearl Quijada; Andrea De La Torre; Mercedes Quintana; Brett Collins; Shabana Din; Daniele Avitabile; Mirko Völkers; Natalie Gude; Reinhard Fässler; Mark A Sussman Journal: Circ Res Date: 2013-05-07 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Daryl O Nelson; Pratik A Lalit; Mitch Biermann; Yogananda S Markandeya; Deborah L Capes; Luke Addesso; Gina Patel; Tianxiao Han; Manorama C John; Patricia A Powers; Karen M Downs; Timothy J Kamp; Gary E Lyons Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2016-09-13 Impact factor: 6.277