RATIONALE: Hypoxia favors stem cell quiescence, whereas normoxia is required for stem cell activation, but whether cardiac stem cell (CSC) function is regulated by the hypoxic/normoxic state of the cell is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: A balance between hypoxic and normoxic CSCs may be present in the young heart, although this homeostatic control may be disrupted with aging. Defects in tissue oxygenation occur in the old myocardium, and this phenomenon may expand the pool of hypoxic CSCs, which are no longer involved in myocyte renewal. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we show that the senescent heart is characterized by an increased number of quiescent CSCs with intact telomeres that cannot re-enter the cell cycle and form a differentiated progeny. Conversely, myocyte replacement is controlled only by frequently dividing CSCs with shortened telomeres; these CSCs generate a myocyte population that is chronologically young but phenotypically old. Telomere dysfunction dictates their actual age and mechanical behavior. However, the residual subset of quiescent young CSCs can be stimulated in situ by stem cell factor reversing the aging myopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the notion that strategies targeting CSC activation and growth interfere with the manifestations of myocardial aging in an animal model. Although caution has to be exercised in the translation of animal studies to human beings, our data strongly suggest that a pool of functionally competent CSCs persists in the senescent heart and that this stem cell compartment can promote myocyte regeneration effectively, partly correcting the aging myopathy.
RATIONALE: Hypoxia favors stem cell quiescence, whereas normoxia is required for stem cell activation, but whether cardiac stem cell (CSC) function is regulated by the hypoxic/normoxic state of the cell is currently unknown. OBJECTIVE: A balance between hypoxic and normoxic CSCs may be present in the young heart, although this homeostatic control may be disrupted with aging. Defects in tissue oxygenation occur in the old myocardium, and this phenomenon may expand the pool of hypoxic CSCs, which are no longer involved in myocyte renewal. METHODS AND RESULTS: Here, we show that the senescent heart is characterized by an increased number of quiescent CSCs with intact telomeres that cannot re-enter the cell cycle and form a differentiated progeny. Conversely, myocyte replacement is controlled only by frequently dividing CSCs with shortened telomeres; these CSCs generate a myocyte population that is chronologically young but phenotypically old. Telomere dysfunction dictates their actual age and mechanical behavior. However, the residual subset of quiescent young CSCs can be stimulated in situ by stem cell factor reversing the aging myopathy. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the notion that strategies targeting CSC activation and growth interfere with the manifestations of myocardial aging in an animal model. Although caution has to be exercised in the translation of animal studies to human beings, our data strongly suggest that a pool of functionally competent CSCs persists in the senescent heart and that this stem cell compartment can promote myocyte regeneration effectively, partly correcting the aging myopathy.
Authors: Alan S Go; Dariush Mozaffarian; Véronique L Roger; Emelia J Benjamin; Jarett D Berry; William B Borden; Dawn M Bravata; Shifan Dai; Earl S Ford; Caroline S Fox; Sheila Franco; Heather J Fullerton; Cathleen Gillespie; Susan M Hailpern; John A Heit; Virginia J Howard; Mark D Huffman; Brett M Kissela; Steven J Kittner; Daniel T Lackland; Judith H Lichtman; Lynda D Lisabeth; David Magid; Gregory M Marcus; Ariane Marelli; David B Matchar; Darren K McGuire; Emile R Mohler; Claudia S Moy; Michael E Mussolino; Graham Nichol; Nina P Paynter; Pamela J Schreiner; Paul D Sorlie; Joel Stein; Tanya N Turan; Salim S Virani; Nathan D Wong; Daniel Woo; Melanie B Turner Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-12-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Roberto Bolli; Atul R Chugh; Domenico D'Amario; John H Loughran; Marcus F Stoddard; Sohail Ikram; Garth M Beache; Stephen G Wagner; Annarosa Leri; Toru Hosoda; Fumihiro Sanada; Julius B Elmore; Polina Goichberg; Donato Cappetta; Naresh K Solankhi; Ibrahim Fahsah; D Gregg Rokosh; Mark S Slaughter; Jan Kajstura; Piero Anversa Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Atul R Chugh; Garth M Beache; John H Loughran; Nathan Mewton; Julius B Elmore; Jan Kajstura; Patroklos Pappas; Antone Tatooles; Marcus F Stoddard; Joao A C Lima; Mark S Slaughter; Piero Anversa; Roberto Bolli Journal: Circulation Date: 2012-09-11 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Raj R Makkar; Rachel R Smith; Ke Cheng; Konstantinos Malliaras; Louise Ej Thomson; Daniel Berman; Lawrence Sc Czer; Linda Marbán; Adam Mendizabal; Peter V Johnston; Stuart D Russell; Karl H Schuleri; Albert C Lardo; Gary Gerstenblith; Eduardo Marbán Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-02-14 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Fatih Kocabas; Ahmed I Mahmoud; Drazen Sosic; Enzo R Porrello; Rui Chen; Joseph A Garcia; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Hesham A Sadek Journal: J Cardiovasc Transl Res Date: 2012-05-08 Impact factor: 4.132
Authors: Samuel E Senyo; Matthew L Steinhauser; Christie L Pizzimenti; Vicky K Yang; Lei Cai; Mei Wang; Ting-Di Wu; Jean-Luc Guerquin-Kern; Claude P Lechene; Richard T Lee Journal: Nature Date: 2012-12-05 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Kelli I Korski; Dieter A Kubli; Bingyan J Wang; Farid G Khalafalla; Megan M Monsanto; Fareheh Firouzi; Oscar H Echeagaray; Taeyong Kim; Robert M Adamson; Walter P Dembitsky; Åsa B Gustafsson; Mark A Sussman Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2019-01-30 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Raymond D Devine; Sabahattin Bicer; Peter J Reiser; Loren E Wold Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2017-03-24 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Michael A Bellio; Claudia O Rodrigues; Ana Marie Landin; Konstantinos E Hatzistergos; Jeffim Kuznetsov; Victoria Florea; Krystalenia Valasaki; Aisha Khan; Joshua M Hare; Ivonne Hernandez Schulman Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2016-09-30 Impact factor: 4.733