Literature DB >> 22275239

Hierarchical Bayesian formulations for selecting variables in regression models.

Veronika Rockova1, Emmanuel Lesaffre, Jolanda Luime, Bob Löwenberg.   

Abstract

The objective of finding a parsimonious representation of the observed data by a statistical model that is also capable of accurate prediction is commonplace in all domains of statistical applications. The parsimony of the solutions obtained by variable selection is usually counterbalanced by a limited prediction capacity. On the other hand, methodologies that assure high prediction accuracy usually lead to models that are neither simple nor easily interpretable. Regularization methodologies have proven to be useful in addressing both prediction and variable selection problems. The Bayesian approach to regularization constitutes a particularly attractive alternative as it is suitable for high-dimensional modeling, offers valid standard errors, and enables simultaneous estimation of regression coefficients and complexity parameters via computationally efficient MCMC techniques. Bayesian regularization falls within the versatile framework of Bayesian hierarchical models, which encompasses a variety of other approaches suited for variable selection such as spike and slab models and the MC(3) approach. In this article, we review these Bayesian developments and evaluate their variable selection performance in a simulation study for the classical small p large n setting. The majority of the existing Bayesian methodology for variable selection deals only with classical linear regression. Here, we present two applications in the contexts of binary and survival regression, where the Bayesian approach was applied to select markers prognostically relevant for the development of rheumatoid arthritis and for overall survival in acute myeloid leukemia patients.
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22275239     DOI: 10.1002/sim.4439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Med        ISSN: 0277-6715            Impact factor:   2.373


  4 in total

Review 1.  The Application of Bayesian Methods in Cancer Prognosis and Prediction.

Authors:  Jiadong Chu; N A Sun; Wei Hu; Xuanli Chen; Nengjun Yi; Yueping Shen
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2022 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.069

2.  Antarctic climate change: extreme events disrupt plastic phenotypic response in Adélie penguins.

Authors:  Amélie Lescroël; Grant Ballard; David Grémillet; Matthieu Authier; David G Ainley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 3.  Review and evaluation of penalised regression methods for risk prediction in low-dimensional data with few events.

Authors:  Menelaos Pavlou; Gareth Ambler; Shaun Seaman; Maria De Iorio; Rumana Z Omar
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Identifying the source of food-borne disease outbreaks: An application of Bayesian variable selection.

Authors:  Rianne Jacobs; Emmanuel Lesaffre; Peter Fm Teunis; Michael Höhle; Jan van de Kassteele
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.021

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.